Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

2.44s

  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Levine

    582 Pa. 459 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 2005

    872 A.2d 1138 (2005) OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Barry Franklin LEVINE, Respondent. No. 917 Disciplinary Docket No. 3. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 7, 2005. Decided April 27, 2005. … It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E. Justice CASTILLE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lebotesis, N. v. PBPP

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 8, 2017

    : Petitioner : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ODC, Pet v. Raul I. Jauregui

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 2019

    OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2486 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 134 DB 2017 : v … Philadelphia) : Respondent : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2019, on certification by the Disciplinary Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tower Access v. S Union of: South Union Twp

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 2019

    PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT TOWER ACCESS GROUP, LLC : No. 325 WAL 2018 : : v … Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : THE SOUTH UNION TOWNSHIP : ZONING HEARING BOARD

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jenkins v. Scranton

    205 Pa. 598 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1903

    Justice Brown, In Jenlcins v. … Bowman, v. Slifer, 25 Pa. 23 . The judgment must be affirmed, except in so far as it includes salary for the appellee for the month of July, 1901.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Wilson, E. v. WCAB (PA Turnpike)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 2018

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE : COMMISSION),

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Osterheldt v. Philadelphia

    195 Pa. 362 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1900

    While the board of surveyors may have omitted Preston street from the revised plan in 1874, thereby vacating it, the fact is not found by the referee and only appears inferentially in the argument of counsel. … Should they succeed *363 in showing that the street was vacated, as tliey allege, it would apparently bring the case within our recent decision of Wetherill v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bunner, R. v. WCAB (Delcora)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 2017

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (DELCORA), :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Storck

    442 Pa. 197 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1971

    Stoner v. California, 376 U.S. 483 , 84 S. Ct. 889 (1964) ; Chapman v. United States, 365 U.S. 610 , 81 S. Ct. 776 (1961); Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S. Ct. 725 (1960); United States v. Poole, 307 F. … La. 1969); United States v. Brown, 300 F. Supp. 1285 (D. N.H. 1969); and, People v. Egan, 250 Cal. App. 2d 433 , 58 Cal. Reporter 627 (1967).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Roos v. Silk Mills (B. Co. Tr. Co.)

    342 Pa. 81 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1941

    L. 7, 12 PS § 782, “interest is a legal incident of every judgment: Cochran v. Cummings, 4 Dallas, 250 ; Commonwealth v. Miller, 8 S. & R. 452. … ‘Where the terms of an obligation comprehend interest, it is inaccurate to say interest is added by way of damages, for it is a substantive part of the debt as much as the principal is Hummel v. Brown, 24 Pa. 310 .”

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Koehler, G. v. WCAB (SEPTA)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 2018

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (SEPTA), :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Washington Arbitration Case

    436 Pa. 168 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 1969

    In Harney v. … Cleaver v. Board of Adjustment, 414 Pa. 367 , 200 A. 2d 408 (1964); Genkinger v. New Castle, 368 Pa. 547 , 84 A. 2d 303 (1951). The statute which is most relevant is the Act of May 22, 1933, P.

    Cited 173 timesPublished
  • Brozman, C. v. WCAB (Commonwealth)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 2018

    Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA),

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shisler v. Philadelphia

    239 Pa. 468 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1913

    Justice Elkin, The mandamus issued in this case directed the director of the department of public works and the chief of the board of surveyors to strike from the city plan certain described property of the plaintiff which … In *470 Com. v. Fitler, 136 Pa. 129 , this court, speaking through Mr.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Taylor G. v. Talaber

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 2017

    : No. 29 EM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v … TALABER, PENNSYLVANIA : BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, : ET.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re: Amendment of Rule 219 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 2022

    : DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 9th day of May, 2022, upon the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board … No. 103(a)(3), IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rule 219 of the Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement is amended in the attached form.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Wooley

    259 Pa. 249 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1918

    Chief Justice Brown, The appellant was convicted in the court below of voluntary manslaughter on an indictment charging him with murder. … The refusal to permit him to do so was clear error: Commonwealth v. Garanchoskie, 251 Pa. 247 ; Wallace v. United States, 162 U. S. Rep. 466 ; Commonwealth v. Woodward, 102 Mass. 155 ; Batten v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Stewart

    243 Pa. 485 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1914

    The authorities fully sustain this conclusion: Siter v. Morrs, 13 Pa. 218 ; Thomas v. Cummiskey, 108 Pa. 354 ; Roberts v. Firemen’s Ins. Co., 165 Pa. 55 ; Pittsburgh Storage Co. v. … As to rights Avhich originate in the relation established by the instrument the ordinary rule must apply: Browne on Parol Evidence, 28.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Ferencz, E. v. WCAB (Standard Steel)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 2018

    Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (STANDARD STEEL, LLC), :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of: Edward J. O'Brien, III

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 2022

    : : No. 149 DB 2016 Petitioner : : Attorney Registration No. 32985 v … Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.