Case law

Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. Getz & Getz & Co.

113 Pa. 214 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1886

Co. v. Davis, 26 Pa. St., 238. He is entitled to compensation according- to his interest: Brown v. Powell, 1 Casey, 230. We do not understand thé existence of this rule as to the right of H. S. … When in a civil case no request is made, the mere omission to charge upon a particular point is not ground of error: Fox v. Fox, 96 Pa. St., 60. The judgment is affirmed.

Wynnefield United Presbyterian Church v. City of Philadelphia

348 Pa. 252 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 1943

Justice Linn, These appeals by the City, the School District, the Board of Revision of Taxes, and the Receiver of Taxes, complain of a decree restraining them from collecting city and school taxes for the years from 1927 … Northampton County, 307 Pa. 550, 558 , 162 A. 209 ; Philadelphia v. Kolb, 288 Pa. 359, 362 , 136 A. 239 ; Christ Church Hospital v. Philadelphia, 24 Pa. 229 ; Pittsburgh School District v. E. S. S. Land Co., 140 Pa.

Kimberly Clark Corp. v. WCAB (Bromley)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 2017

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (BROMLEY), :

Commonwealth v. Graham

528 Pa. 250 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1991

In reversing the judgment of sentence in this case, the Superior Court properly relied upon this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. … See also, Fleming James, Jr., Civil Procedure (Little Brown & Co. 1965), § 7.11.

ODC v. Michael E. Hughes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2020

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2724 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 75 DB 2020 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Barnes v. Pickett Hardware Co.

203 Pa. 570 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 1902

In Burr v. … See further as to the strictness of the identification required, Landis v. Roth, 109 Pa. 621 , and Rosencrance v. Johnson, 191 Pa. 520 .

Mims., A. v. PBPP & AG J. Shapiro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2017

: No. 134 MM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE AND : ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO

ODC v. Stephen Paul Hildebrand

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 2022

COUNSEL, : No. 2863 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 124 DB 2021 : v … Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Johnson v. American Standard

982 A.2d 1223 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 2009

Dorothy Mauger, Executrix of the Estate of Russell Mauger and in her own Right v. A.W. … Dolores Stea, Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Stea and in her own Right v. A.W.

Tyler v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

343 Pa. 179 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1941

In order for us to act the verdict must be “so grossly excessive as to shock our sense of justice and to indicate a clear abuse of discretion on the part of the court below”: Maselli v. … Stephens, 331 Pa. 491, 496 , 200 A. 590 ; Brown v. Paxton, 332 Pa. 260 , 2 A. 2d 729 ; Mashinsky v. Phila., 333 Pa. 97 , 3 A. 2d 790 . The judgment is affirmed.

Griffin's Appeal

109 Pa. 150 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1885

In the case of Gowen v. Phila. … In Neill v. Gallagher, 31 Leg. Int., 388 , we held that the mere setting back of a building from the line of the street is not a dedication of the intervening space to public use.

Woods, J v. PABPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2017

: No. 7 WM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION & PAROLE, :

Commonwealth v. Glasco

503 Pa. 124 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1983

The Superior Court, relying on our holding in Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 494 Pa. 380, 384 , 431 A.2d 905, 908 (1981).

Allied Fire Protection Systm v. WCAB (Warner)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 11, 2017

: : Petitioners : : : v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (WARNER), :

Mitzel, M. v. PBPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 2019

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, :

ODC v. Farrell, J.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 2019

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2362 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 34 DB 2017 : v … Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Wetzel, D. v. UCBR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 2019

: No. 187 MM 2018 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION : BOARD OF REVIEW, :

In Re: Amendment of Rule 328 of the Pa Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 2022

: : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 10th day of March, 2022, upon the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board … No. 103(a)(3), IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that rule 328 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement is amended in the attached form.

Muhammad, A. v. UCBR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 2017

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION : BOARD OF REVIEW, :

ODC, Pet v. James Robert Protasio

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 2020

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2646 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 151 DB 2019 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).