Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.86s
Kline, C. v. PBPP and Atty General
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 2017
: No. 146 MM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, AND : ATTORNEY GENERAL, JOSH SHAPIRO
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn the Matter of Michael Benson Wolf
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 5, 2021
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2139 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 28 DB 2015 v … Respondent shall comply with all of the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board, pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Cited 0 timesPublishedWang, Y., Pets. v. WCAB (New Li Nail Spa)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2019
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from Petitioners : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : : v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (NEW LI NAIL SPA, INC.), :
Cited 0 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 2019
Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, :
Cited 0 timesPublishedMartel, J., Pets. v. Allegheny County
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 2020
: from the Order of the Petitioners : Commonwealth Court : : v … : : ALLEGHENY COUNTY, CITY OF : PITTSBURGH, PITTSBURGH PUBLIC : SCHOOLS, AND ALLEGHENY COUNTY : BOARD
Cited 0 timesPublishedPetition of Pennsylvania Bar Ass'n
501 Pa. 127 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1983
The words of our Constitution plainly direct confidentiality of proceedings before the Judicial Inquiry and Review Board, unless there is a recommendation for discipline upon the Board's finding of good cause. … Article V, Section 18(g). It is that finding of good cause which triggers our jurisdiction under Article V, Section 18(h). In this case the Board has found no good cause for discipline.
Cited 5 timesPublished109 Pa. 95 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1885
In this the case resembles that of the Baltimore and Philadelphia Steamboat Co. v. Brown, 4 P. F. … This is not like the case of a mere set-off which the mortgagor might have against the assignee, and which, as we held in Blair v. Mathiott, 10 Wr., 262, and Downey v. Tharp, 13 P. F.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2017
: No. 12 WM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, :
Cited 0 timesPublishedDeBellis, G. v. WCAB (Dermatology, LTD)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 2019
Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (DERMATOLOGY, LTD), :
Cited 0 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 2019
: No. 51 MAP 2018 : Appellant : : : v … : : : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, :
Cited 0 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 2018
: Petitioner : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (FEDERAL EXPRESS : CORPORATION),
Cited 0 timesPublished206 Pa. 522 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 1903
Most of the cases as to the conclusiveness of a statutory audit are cited and commented on by Agnew, J., in Blackmore v. … The same ruling has been followed since in Westmoreland County v. Fisher, 172 Pa. 317 , and Commonwealth v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedIn Re: Enforcement of Subpoenas b/f the Bd of Med.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 2019
of Medicine (Board), is an indispensable party. … See CRY, Inc. v. Mill Serv., Inc., 640 A.2d 372, 377-78 (Pa. 1994). In this case, the Bureau did not object to the subpoenas when issued by the Hearing Examiner, or at any time prior to Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedM. Manor Holding LP v. Monroe Co. TCB,et al
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 2019
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from Petitioners : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : : v … : : : MONROE COUNTY TAX CLAIM : BUREAU AND THE MONROE COUNTY : BOARD OF ASSESSMENT
Cited 0 timesPublishedLimper v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
297 Pa. 204 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1929
Boyd, 1 Watts 365, 366 ; Commonwealth v. Hine, 213 Pa. 97 . … We can interfere in such case, as we said in Goldman et al v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedLewis, J., Pet v. WCAB (Fastrack Construc. Inc.)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 7, 2017
: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (FASTRACK CONSTRUCTION, : INC.),
Cited 0 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 2017
: No. 175 MM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, :
Cited 0 timesPublishedHays v. Pittsburgh & Steubenville Railroad
38 Pa. 81 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1861
Clark & Thaw, 5 Casey 146; Graff v. Railroad Company, 7 Casey 490; Bavington v. … On the 12th of November 1852, however, at another meeting of the board at which Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublished229 Pa. 41 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1910
Justice Brown, The claim of the appellant that his decedent took an absolute estate from her husband is based upon the second clause of the latter’s will. … What she used was hers absolutely, and the remainder belonged to his estate: Gross v. Strominger, 178 Pa. 64 ; Trout v. Rominger, 198 Pa. 91 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedRuse v. WCAB (VMFS) of: VMF Sewickley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 6, 2017
PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT GLEN RUSE : No. 65 WAL 2016 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna