Case law

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

862 A.2d 577 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 2004

and it is hereby ORDERED that Gustee Brown be and he is suspended from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for a period of one year and one day and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, … It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Humphrey Et Ux. v. Brown Et Ux.

291 Pa. 53 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1927

L. 389; Mott v. Kaldes, 288 Pa. 264 ; Goldstein v. Nichols, 273 Pa. 107 . … Co. v. First Nat. Bank, 277 Pa. 401 ). Though the agent may testify to acts which establish his authority (Hileman v. Falck, 263 Pa. 351 ; Lawall v.

Brown v. Ancient Order of United Workmen

208 Pa. 101 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 1904

Brown, three children of the first wife and one child of the second wife. … Rep. 83 ; Grace v. North Western Mutual Relief Association, (Wis.) 41 Am. St. Rep. 62 . And the method presented by the constitution and by-laws of the association for changing beneficiaries is exclusive : McCarthy v.

Mauch v. Pittsburgh Pension Board

383 Pa. 448 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1956

On December 7, 1954, on the authority of Hickey v. … Commonwealth, 10 Pa. 442 , and Second & Third Street Passenger Railway v.

Brown v. German-American Title & Trust Co.

174 Pa. 443 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 1896

Beharry v. Election Board

511 Pa. 375 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1986

Zolitor v. Election Board

518 Pa. 56 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1988

Brown v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

200 A.3d 938 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 2019

Brown, A., Aplt. v. Dept. of Corrections

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 31, 2019

BROWN, : No. 17 MAP 2018 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth … Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court dated January : 17, 2018 at No. 3 M.D. 2017 v

Commonwealth v. Brown, L.; of: Family Members

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 2026

Dec., 7 2023) (unpublished); Malone v. Smith, 2023 WL 2351694, at *2 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2023) (unpublished); Brown I, 196 A.3d 130; Commonwealth v. … We recognized this in Brown I when we held that in matters of post-conviction concessions of error, the PCRA courts must engage in 9 Brady v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

570 Pa. 95 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 10, 2002

AND NOW, this 10th day of October, 2002, there having been filed with this Court by Carl Herbert Brown his verified Statement of Resignation dated August 27, 2002, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth … Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Graham v. Zoning Hearing Board

520 Pa. 526 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1989

See Clepper Farms, Inc. v. Trimmer, 66 Pa.Commw. 326, 443 A.2d 1385 (1982). … See Upper Allen Township v. Zoning Hearing Board of Upper Allen Township, 77 Pa.Commw. 582, 466 A.2d 292 (1983).

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

808 A.2d 567 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 10, 2002

AND NOW, this 10th day of October, 2002, there having been filed with this Court by Carl Herbert Brown his verified Statement of Resignation dated August 27, 2002, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth … Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Com., Dept. of Public Wel. v. Uec, Inc.

483 Pa. 503 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 24, 1979

DPW appealed the dismissal of their preliminary objections to Commonwealth Court which reversed the Board, sustained DPW’s preliminary objections and dismissed UEC’s complaint. Commonwealth, Dep’t: of Pub. Welfare v. … . *515 Margiotti v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

808 A.2d 567 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 10, 2002

AND NOW, this 10th day of October, 2002, there having been filed with this Court by Carl Herbert Brown his verified Statement of Resignation dated August 27, 2002, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth … Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Selig v. Zoning Hearing Board

169 A.3d 1079 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 2017

Board of Charities v. Lockard

198 Pa. 572 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1901

The present case is ruled directly by that of Thackara v. Mintzer, 100 Pa. 151 . … In the case of Decker v. Directors of the Poor, 120 Pa. 272 , the facts are different.

Selig v. Zoning Hearing Board

169 A.3d 1079 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 2017

Taylor v. Board of Health

31 Pa. 73 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1855

If the case of The Borough of Allentown v. Saeger, 20 State R. 421, was decided upon a proper principle, then the judgment at Nisi Prius, upon this reserved point, is very plainly right. … The suit is not against the state, and could not be; but it is against the executive officer of the state; for, in this matter, the Board of Health was nothing else.

Brown, Early & Co. v. Susquehanna Boom Co.

109 Pa. 57 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1885

Collins, 2 Norris, 359; Lee v. Keys, 7 Norris, 175; Brown v. Dempsey, 14 Norris, 243; Bradlee v. Whitney, 12 Out., 362. … In Gould v.