Case law

Pennington, M. v. WCAB (Transol Corp)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 14, 2019

: No. 200 MM 2018 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (TRANSOL CORP), :

MFW Wine Co. LLC v. Pa LCB, Aplt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 2021

the Order of the Appellees : Commonwealth Court at No. 251 : MD 2020 dated May 1, 2020 : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL : BOARD, :

Dill, E. v. PBPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 2019

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION & PAROLE, :

Deloatch, W. v. WCAB, Pet of: City of Phila.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 2020

PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT WAYNE DELOATCH : No. 117 EAL 2020 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD

Li, J. v. WCAB (New Li Nail Spa, Inc.)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2019

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (NEW LI NAIL SPA, INC.), :

Commonwealth v. Lenhart

241 Pa. 129 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 19, 1913

Justice Brown, Whether the mandamus prayed for in the court below should have issued was a pure question of law. … Another case to which reference may be made is Glamorgan Iron Co. v. Snyder, 84 Pa. 397 . There the two lay judges undertook to overrule the action of the trial judge on a motion for a new trial.

Mueller v. Monongahela Fire Clay Co.

183 Pa. 450 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1898

At a monthly *454 meeting of the board of directors, on July 10, 1895, by resolution, the board was authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the two Bovards, Parnell and Weaver, the note of the company in the sum … In case of Oil Co. v.

ODC, Pet v. Megan Anne Kerrigan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 2023

COUNSEL, : No. 2439 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : : No. 205 DB 2017 v … Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

ODC, Pet v. Stephanie Ashley Hand

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 2021

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2454 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 21 DB 2021 v … Respondent shall comply with all of the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Coles, H. v. PBPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 2019

: No. 99 MM 2019 : Petitioner : : : v … TALABER, ESQUIRE, : DEFENDANT SECRETARY, : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE ("PBPP"), : :

Commonwealth v. Vitale

250 Pa. 548 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 3, 1915

Chief Justice Brown, Any person who is an accessory before the fact to a felony may be indicted, tried and convicted as if he were the principal felon: Act of March 31, 1860, Sec. 44, P. L. 440. … At the present term of the court, in Commonwealth v.

Huntingdon & Broad Top Mountain Railroad & Coal Co. v. Decker

82 Pa. 119 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1876

Knowledge of the superintendent, possessing the general powers stated, is knowledge to the company: Frazier v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 2 Wright 104 ; Caldwell et ux. v. Brown et al., 3 P. F. Smith 453; O’Donnell v. … In Shaeffer v. Kreitzer, 6 Binn. 430 ; Nash v. Gilkeson, 5 S. & R. 352; Ingham v. Crary, 1 Phila.

Grimme Combustion, Inc. v. Mergentime Corp.

385 Pa. Super. 260 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1989

Davis v. Supermarkets, Inc. v. United Food and Commercial Workers Local 23, 368 Pa.Super. 290 , 533 A.2d 1068 (1987) (citing Ratz v. Ratz, 359 Pa.Super. 8 , 518 A.2d 317 (1986)). … Beckman v.

Punxsutawney Iron Co. v. Fort Pitt Malleable & Grey Iron Co.

216 Pa. 432 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1907

The court below did not state any reason for holding the affidavits of defense to be insufficient, but the learned counsel for appellee rely on Weld v. Barker, 153 Pa. 465 ; and Newbold v. … Pennock, 154 Pa. 591 , to support their contention that the averment of the agency of Rogers, Brown & Company and their authority to cancel the contract did not meet the legal requirements in such cases.

Carver v. Comm. of PA.

628 Pa. 10 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 30, 2014

Saxton v. Mitchell

78 Pa. 479 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1875

The legislature then had no power to authorize the title of the heirs to be divested: Grim v. School Directors, 7 P. F. Smith 437: Shonk v. Brown, 11 Id. 327; Haley v. The City of Philadelphia, 18 Id. 47.

Massi, J., Aplt. v. City of Chester

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2019

: No. 38 MAP 2019 : Appellant : : : v … : : : CITY OF CHESTER AGGREGATED : PENSION BOARD AND CITY OF : CHESTER,

Diaz, M., Aplt v. Wetzel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 17, 2021

Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth at No. 583 MD 2020 : dated November 30, 2020 v … : MASON, AND PENNSYLVANIA BOARD : OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, AND : ATTORNEY GENERAL OF : PENNSYLVANIA, : : Appellees

Commonwealth v. Gary

671 A.2d 1129 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1996

See Commonwealth v. Browne, 526 Pa. 83 , 584 A.2d 902 (1990).

Samuel Land Co. v. ZBA of Pgh, Pet of: Guttman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 2019

PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT SAMUEL LAND COMPANY : No. 44 WAL 2019 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF