Case law

Huntingdon & Broad Top Mountain Railroad & Coal Co. v. Decker

82 Pa. 119 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1876

Knowledge of the superintendent, possessing the general powers stated, is knowledge to the company: Frazier v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 2 Wright 104 ; Caldwell et ux. v. Brown et al., 3 P. F. Smith 453; O’Donnell v. … In Shaeffer v. Kreitzer, 6 Binn. 430 ; Nash v. Gilkeson, 5 S. & R. 352; Ingham v. Crary, 1 Phila.

Punxsutawney Iron Co. v. Fort Pitt Malleable & Grey Iron Co.

216 Pa. 432 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1907

The court below did not state any reason for holding the affidavits of defense to be insufficient, but the learned counsel for appellee rely on Weld v. Barker, 153 Pa. 465 ; and Newbold v. … Pennock, 154 Pa. 591 , to support their contention that the averment of the agency of Rogers, Brown & Company and their authority to cancel the contract did not meet the legal requirements in such cases.

Commonwealth v. Bright

361 Pa. Super. 261 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 1987

Commonwealth v. Soblotney, 502 Pa. 418, 422 , 466 A.2d 1022, 1024 (1983); Commonwealth v. Brown, 489 Pa. 285, 303 , 414 A.2d 70, 79 (1980). … Brown, 336 Pa.Super. 628, 635 , 486 A.2d 441, 445 (1984), where it was apparent from the record that the inchoate crimes did not share the same objective.

City of Philadelphia v. Civil Service Commission

583 Pa. 413 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 2005

Compare Ruth Family Medical Ctr. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Steinhouse), 718 A.2d 397, 402 (Pa.Commw.1998) (characterizing section 422’s hearsay rule as “purely procedural”) and Dallas Cty. v. … . v.

Carver v. Comm. of PA.

628 Pa. 10 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 30, 2014

Commonwealth v. Gary

671 A.2d 1129 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1996

See Commonwealth v. Browne, 526 Pa. 83 , 584 A.2d 902 (1990).

Gordon v. Lancaster Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n

340 Pa. Super. 253 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1985

Bogash v. … Glenn v.

Samuel Land Co. v. ZBA of Pgh, Pet of: Guttman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 2019

PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT SAMUEL LAND COMPANY : No. 44 WAL 2019 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF

Mueller v. Monongahela Fire Clay Co.

183 Pa. 450 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1898

At a monthly *454 meeting of the board of directors, on July 10, 1895, by resolution, the board was authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the two Bovards, Parnell and Weaver, the note of the company in the sum … In case of Oil Co. v.

Anderson v. Greenville Borough

442 Pa. 11 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1971

L. 2045, §3, as amended, 62 P.S. §1973, Huffman v. … "Nordmark v. Indian Queen Hotel Co., supra.

Dubois's Appeal

293 Pa. 186 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 1928

Co. v. Northumberland Co. Comrs., 229 Pa. 460 ; P. & R. C. & I. Co. v. Comrs., 250 Pa. 101 ; Reading Coal & Iron Co.’s Assessment, 290 Pa. 187 . … Co. v. U. S., 220 U. S. 94 .

Kramer v. Standard Steel Car Co.

281 Pa. 348 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1924

Co. v. McElwee, 67 Pa. 311 ; Bickley v. So. Penna. Trac. Co., 56 Pa. Superior Ct. 113 . … Co., 191 Pa. 390, 401 ; and see Cohen v. Phila. & Reading R. R. Co., 211 Pa. 227 ; McNeal v. Ry. Co., 131 Pa. 184 .

Schuylkill County v. Minogue

160 Pa. 164 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1894

been said that the report of the auditors and the judgment thereon, in so far as they relate to him, were unauthorized, and the rule to strike off said judgment should have been made absolute at plaintiff’s cost: Allen v. … Krips, 119 Pa. 4 ; Pantall v. Dickey, 123 Pa. 438 ; McKinney v. Brown, 130 Pa. 368 .

Sota and Selective, Pets. v. WCAB (Czarnecki)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 2020

for Allowance of Appeal Petitioners : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court : v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (CZARNECKI, ZAWILLA D/B/A : GORILLA

Potts Et Ux. v. Guthrie

282 Pa. 200 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 3, 1924

Co., 247 Pa. 230 ; Hitz v. Pittsburgh & B. St. Ry. Co., 245 Pa. 9 ; Hertzberg v. Pitts. Taxicab Co., 243 Pa. 540 ; Begley v. R. R. Co., 201 Pa. 84 . … That the loss of fecundity is a proper element of damage in a personal injury case is undoubted (Brown et al. v. Quaker City Cab Co., 274 Pa. 289 ; Alabama, etc., R. R. Co. v. Hill, 93 Alabama 514, 30 Am.

Watts Twp Bd of Auditors v. Raudensky, K.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 2019

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT WATTS TOWNSHIP BOARD OF : No. 27 MAL 2019 AUDITORS, : : Petitioner … : : Petitioner : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : v

Commonwealth ex rel. Snyder v. Mitchell

2 Pen. & W. 517 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1831

Although power to grant writs of mandamus was given to this court by the legislature so early as 1722, no trace 'of its existence in practice is found in our books before the case of Respublica v. … That doubt has since been resolved into certainty by the judgment in the Commonwealth, at the relation of the Insjjcctors of the Philadelphia Prison v.

Dorvilus, W. v. WCAB (Cardone Industries)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 2018

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … : : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (CARDONE INDUSTRIES), :

Rizvi, H. v. BPOA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 2020

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL AND : OCCUPATIONAL AFFAIRS, STATE : BOARD

Howard v. Philadelphia

250 Pa. 184 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 3, 1915

The plaintiff submitted and was vaccinated by a physician employed by the Board of Health without expense to himself. … In Betham v.