Case law

Nyce v. Board of Commissioners

319 Pa. 353 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1935

Cooke, 239 Pa. 427 ; *359 Buttorff v. York, 268 Pa. 143 ; Com. v. Provident Trust Co., 287 Pa. 251, 259 ; Com. v. Lomas, 302 Pa. 97 . … If two statutes can be made to stand together, effect should be given both as far as possible: Brown v. Co. Comrs., 21 Pa. 37 ; Ulrich’s Case, 267 Pa. 233, 236 ; Garr v. Fuls, 286 Pa. 137, 148 .

Protz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

639 Pa. 645 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 2017

Dev. v. … Sys., Inc. v.

Kennedy v. Board of Health

2 Pa. 366 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1845

The cases, therefore, of Rehner v. Zeigler, 3 Watts & Serg. 258 , and Lehman v. … Rex v. Martin, 2 Camp. 100; 1 Greenl. Ev. 542, 393. The fourth error is, that the court refused to permit the defendant below7 to prove the cause of the nuisance.

Sposato v. Radnor Township Board

440 Pa. 107 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1970

Cooper v. Board of Adjust., 412 Pa. 429 , 195 A. 2d 101 (1963); Andress v. Zoning Bd. of Adjust., 410 Pa. 77 , 188 A. 2d 709 (1963); Magrann v. Zoning Bd. of Adjust., 404 Pa. 198 , 170 A. 2d 553 (1961). … Pyzdrowski v. Pgh. Board of Adj., 437 Pa. 481 , 263 A. 2d 426 (1970); Mason v. Schaefer, 410 Pa. 239 , 189 A. 2d 167 (1963); Upper St. Clair Twp. Appeal, 408 Pa. 416 , 184 A. 2d 263 (1962); Richman v.

Brown, D. v. City of Oil City

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 2022

BROWN, INDIVIDUALLY AND : No. 292 WAL 2021 AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF : KATHRYN A. … BROWN, DECEASED, : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from v.

Eiser v. Brown Williamson Tobacco Corp.

589 Pa. 356 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 2006

Conlon v. Retirement Board

558 Pa. 375 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1999

Kinsella v. Board of Trustees

340 Pa. 497 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 1941

Giuffrida v. Ashe, 137 Pa. … Lynch v.

Eiser v. Brown Williamson Tobacco Corp.

909 A.2d 297 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 2006

Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. Rundle

424 Pa. 505 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1967

Chief Justice Bell, Robert Brown was indicted for murder and tried before a Judge and jury. … The meaning of “an establishment of religion” is analyzed and interpreted in the recent case of Abington School District v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 .

Brown, O. v. WCAB (SD of Phila.)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 2021

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT ODESSA BROWN, : No. 311 EAL 2020 : Petitioner … : Commonwealth Court : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

581 Pa. 617 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 2004

Brown be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. … Respondent shall pay costs, *618 if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Conlon v. Retirement Board

555 Pa. 167 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 9, 1999

Whether the Commonwealth Court properly required that it was the Retirement Board of Allegheny County’s burden to prove that Respondent had been terminated due to a “cause or act of his own”. *168 3. … Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in not remanding this matter to the Retirement Board of Allegheny County for the taking of additional evidence.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

862 A.2d 577 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 2004

and it is hereby ORDERED that Gustee Brown be and he is suspended from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for a period of one year and one day and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, … It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Price v. Tax Review Board

409 Pa. 479 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1963

Philadelphia School District v. Parent Metal Products, Inc., 402 Pa. 361 , 167 A. 2d 257 (1961) ; Philadelphia School District v. … Tax Review Board v. D. H. Shapiro Co., 409 Pa. 253 , 185 A. 2d 529 (1962) ; Tax Review Board v. Belmont Laboratories, 392 Pa. 473 , 141 A. 2d 234 (1958); Paper Products Co. v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

866 A.2d 1087 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 2004

Brown be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. … Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

866 A.2d 1087 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 2004

Brown be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. … Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Humphrey Et Ux. v. Brown Et Ux.

291 Pa. 53 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1927

L. 389; Mott v. Kaldes, 288 Pa. 264 ; Goldstein v. Nichols, 273 Pa. 107 . … Co. v. First Nat. Bank, 277 Pa. 401 ). Though the agent may testify to acts which establish his authority (Hileman v. Falck, 263 Pa. 351 ; Lawall v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

862 A.2d 577 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 2004

and it is hereby ORDERED that Gustee Brown be and he is suspended from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for a period of one year and one day and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, … It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

580 Pa. 539 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 2004

and it is hereby ORDERED that Gustee Brown be and he is suspended from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for a period of one year and one day and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, … It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.