Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

0.82s

  • Kraeling v. Dormont Borough

    352 Pa. 644 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1945

    The court cited Kies v. … In Hartness v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Preate

    557 Pa. 4 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 1999

    See, e.g., Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eilberg, 497 Pa. 388, 391 , 441 A.2d 1193, 1195 (1982). … Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grigsby, 493 Pa. 194, 200 , 425 A.2d 730, 733 (1981); see also Office of Disciplinary Counsel *132 v. Holston, 533 Pa. 78, 84 , 619 A.2d 1054, 1057 (1993).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Pocono Mtn. SD, Aplt. v. Dept. of Educ.

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 2016

    : Commonwealth Court dated July 8, : 2015, at No. 2052 CD 2014 Affirming : the Order of the Pennsylvania v … The OAJC downplays the Commonwealth’s and the PSERS Board’s fear that the charter school employees here will lose credited service, calling it a “bald assertion.” OAJC at 20, n.12.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Meitner v. Scarborough

    321 Pa. 212 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 1936

    This has been emphasized in many cases: Ellis v. Lane, 85 Pa. 265 ; Foreman v. Hosler, 94 Pa. 418 ; Leware v. Weaver, 121 Pa. 268 ; Com. v. Equitable Ben. Assn., 137 Pa. 412 ; Fleer v. Reagan, 24 Pa. Superior Ct. 170 . … If there is evidence to support the findings, this court will not overrule them or substitute its judgment for that of the trial court: Brown, Earley & Co. v. Susquehanna Boom Co., 109 Pa. 57 .

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Pitts. Junction R. R. Co. v. Pitts.

    352 Pa. 317 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1945

    Co. v. Pittsburgh , 221 Pa. 90 , 70 A. 271 ; Phila. v. Electric Traction Co. , 208 Pa. 157 , 57 A. 354 ; Phila. v. Phila. etc. R. R. Co. , 38 Pa. Super. 529 . … of Assessors, acting as a Board of Revision, of the City of Pittsburgh, in accordance with resolution duly passed by the Board of Assessors authorizing the City Solicitor and Joseph Kocurkovic, a member of said Board, to

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Smith, E. v. Warwick SD (WCAB)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 2024

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … AND LANCASTER- : LEBANON PUBLIC SCHOOLS WORKERS : COMPENSATION FUND (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD), : : Respondents :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelley v. Clark

    327 Pa. 181 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 1937

    It involved the validity of a statute which, at one and the same time, purported to *187 abolish the board of county commissioners of New Haven County and to create a new board, to be appointed by the legislature. … same board and clothes them with the same powers and duties enumerated in the section repealed.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Gray, L., Pet v. PBPP

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2019

    GRAY, : No. 48 WM 2019 : Petitioner : : V. … : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE, : Respondent

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Commissioners of Philadelphia

    2 Whart. 286 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1837

    Price v. The County Commissioners, ( 1 Whart. 1 ); and the reasons of it are obvious. The county commissioners are the officers elected by the people, under the laws, to superintend the finances of the county. … Witmer v. The Commissioners of Lancaster County, that they ought- not to draw orders on an empty treasury; and where the demands exceed the funds, it is an empty treasury as to some of them.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Levine

    83 Pa. D. & C.4th 539 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 2006

    The board will deny petitioner’s motion to reopen the record as the evi *560 dence sought to be considered bears little weight to the board’s review of the instant matter. … V. RECOMMENDATION The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously recommends that the respondent, Michael Levine, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ODC v. Michael Brandon Cohen

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 2023

    COUNSEL, : No. 2957 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : : No. 29 DB 2023 v … Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ODC v. Charles W. Johnston

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 2023

    COUNSEL, : No. 2908 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : : No. 111 DB 2022 v … Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Herriman v. Carducci

    475 Pa. 359 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 1977

    Appellee relies on Greenberg v. Bradford, 432 Pa. 611 , 248 A.2d 51 (1968), and Lennox v. Clark, 372 Pa. 355 , 93 A.2d 834 (1953). Neither case, however, is controlling in the matter before us. … Deer Creek Drainage Basin Authority v. County Board of Elections of Allegheny County, 475 Pa. 491 , 381 A.2d 103 (1977).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • ODC v. Eric J. Landes

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 2023

    Disciplinary Docket No. 3 COUNSEL, : : Petitioner : No. 33 DB 2023 : v … Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Troiani Group v. Cty. of Pgh. BOA

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 2022

    Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court v … : : : CITY OF PITTSBURGH BOARD OF : APPEALS, AND CITY OF PITTSBURGH, :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ODC v. Lori A. Rexroth

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 2023

    Docket No. 3 COUNSEL, : : Petitioner : No. 62 DB 2018 : v … Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goehring v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.

    460 Pa. 138 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1975

    Dennison Brick & Tile Co. v. Chicago Trust Co., 6 Cir., 286 F. 818, 820 . So in Brown v. Pacific Mutual Life Ins. … In Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ruggieri v. West Forum Corp.

    444 Pa. 175 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1971

    See Shydlinski v. Vogt, 406 Pa. 534, 537 , 179 A. 2d 240 (1962), Young v. Kaye, 443 Pa. 335 , 279 A. 2d 759 (1971). Appellant does not really challenge that finding. Her brief has no kind words for Yalentino. … Weissman v. Weissman, 384 Pa. 480 , 121 A. 2d 100 (1956).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Bove, E. v. WCAB (Stein, etc.)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 2020

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (STEIN D/B/A PROVIDER OF CO-

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Underwood, D. v. Pa. Parole Bd.

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 2022

    Petitioner : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, :

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.