Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

0.33s

  • Seyfert v. Bean

    83 Pa. 450 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1877

    As is clearly shown in Holt v. Martin, 1 P. F. Smith 499, in regard to a lease executed in a similar manner, the defendant did not thereby become the tenant of an unknown landlord. … The declaration of Brown having been given in evidence to show that he relinquished her possession of the premises at the time and in the manner stated, we see no error'in permitting her to 'show that he had no such authority

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Berry, W. v. SERB

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 8, 2020

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT : BOARD

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Borough v. Kennedy

    229 Pa. 251 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 1910

    Justice Brown, The second section of the Act of May 8, 1901, P. … O’Neil, 24 Pa. 326 ; Knapp v. Hartung, 73 Pa. 290 ; Erie City Iron Works v. Barber, 118 Pa. 6 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Patterson, A. v. Shelton, K.

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 2024

    DISTRICT ANTHONÉE PATTERSON, : No. 13 EM 2024 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : KENNETH SHELTON, INDIVIDUALLY, AND : PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF : TRUSTEES OF THE GENERAL : ASSEMBLY OF

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marshall v. Carr

    271 Pa. 271 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1921

    To like effect are Ramsey v. Johnson, 3 P. & W. 293; Hoffman v. Kemerer, 44 Pa. 452 ; Com. v. Shanor, 29 Pa. Superior Ct. 358 . … The report of the Pardon Board was not competent evidence, and, as we understand the record, was not treated as such.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Cleavinger v. Reimar

    3 Watts & Serg. 486 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1841

    same year, valid, so that the Meredith warrant, which was granted on- the 23d of August in that year, was not void for that reason, as the board of property thought. … See also Hall v. Hallet, (1 Cox 134), where it is said, that upon principles of policy no attorney shall be permitted to purchase anything in litigation, of which litigation he has the management.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Moore

    378 Pa. Super. 379 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1988

    Clark v. … In Brown v. Com., Dept. of Health, 495 Pa. 456 , 434 A.2d 1179 (1981), the Department of Health released the medical records of an alleged sex offender pursuant to an order issued by the Commonwealth Court.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In re Anonymous No. 22 D.B. 78

    20 Pa. D. & C.3d 416 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 1981

    Charge V dealt with the matter of [F] who was convicted in a criminal trial in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut and respondent agreed to represent [F] on appeal. … The expenses incurred by the board in the investigation and processing of the petition for reinstatement shall be paid by petitioner.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Caruccio, N. v. Shrewsbury Boro. (WCAB)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 2024

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : SHREWSBURY BOROUGH (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD),

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Deloatch, W. v. WCAB, Pet of: City of Phila.

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 2020

    PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT WAYNE DELOATCH : No. 117 EAL 2020 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Merner v. Department of Highways

    375 Pa. 609 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1954

    In Culver v. Commonwealth, 348 Pa. 472, 475 , 35 A. 2d 64 , we quoted from Tunison v. … Baker et al. v. Kirschnek et al., 317 Pa. 225 ; Commonwealth v. Trunk et al., 320 Pa. 270 ; see 59 C.J. 1103, §653.’”

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Lessee of Steinmetz v. Young

    2 Binn. 520 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 1810

    But in the-year 1767, the board of property made an order, that no survey should be accepted, containing more than ten per cent, surplus above the quantity called for by the warrant, with the usual allowance of six per cent … An act of assembly to the same effect was made in April 1785; but as it has been expressly decided by this court in the case of M'Ginnis’s Lessee v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Abington Little League v. Glenburn Twp. ZHB

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 2023

    : No. 199 MAL 2023 : : v. … Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth : Court GLENBURN TOWNSHIP ZONING : HEARING BOARD

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Jones

    452 Pa. 569 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1973

    The appellant relies upon Rule 317(b*) adopted by the Board of Judges of Philadelphia County: “In all cases where the defendant or his attorney has been summoned at least ten days before . . . trial, arraignment may take … Brown. On the facts of this case, we do not feel that the Commonwealth’s inability to produce the alleged victim was necessarily fatal to this charge. The judgment of sentence is affirmed. Mr.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Lawrence, T. v. PBPP

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2020

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION : AND PAROLE,

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Downingtown Area Sch. Dist. v. Chester Cnty. Bd. of Assessment Appeals

    141 A.3d 483 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 13, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Marvelli, J. v. US Foods Inc. (WCAB)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 2024

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD), : : Respondent : ORDER PER CURIAM

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carver v. Comm. of PA.

    628 Pa. 10 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 30, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Butz & Clader v. United States Metal Products Co.

    255 Pa. 53 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1916

    We agree with the court below that “Under the principle as laid down in Young v. American Bonding Co. of Balto., 228 Pa. 373 , and followed in Philadelphia, to use, v. … v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dean, D., Pet v. Lawrence Co Bd of AA

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 2022

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : LAWRENCE COUNTY BOARD OF : ASSESSMENT APPEALS, CITY OF NEW

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.