Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

1.87s

  • Adams v. Pennsylvania Insurance

    1 Rawle 97 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1828

    The case in 13 East, Forbes v. … That there is no magic in a charter party is clear from the case of Parke v. Hebson.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In re Anonymous No. 22 D.B. 78

    20 Pa. D. & C.3d 416 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 1981

    Charge V dealt with the matter of [F] who was convicted in a criminal trial in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut and respondent agreed to represent [F] on appeal. … The expenses incurred by the board in the investigation and processing of the petition for reinstatement shall be paid by petitioner.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re: ZHB of Cheltenham Twp 12-16-15 Decision

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 2019

    See Mohamed v. … See Fonner v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Seeds v. Kahler

    76 Pa. 262 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 1874

    It is well settled that when the wife has a separate estate, and she buys property on the credit of that separate estate, she may hold it against the creditors of her husband: Wieman v. … Anderson et al., 6 Wright 811 ; Rush v. Vought, 5 P. F. Smith 437; Brown v. Pendleton et al., 10 Id. 421; Musser v. Gardner, 16 Id. 242. It is not necessary that she shall have paid for it at the time of her purchase.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Banfield, Aplts. v. Secretary of the Com

    631 Pa. 229 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 17, 2015

    Brown v. Levy, 621 Pa. 1, 4, 73 A.3d 514, 516 n.2 (2013). … Burdick v.

    Cited 83 timesPublished
  • Capellan, G. v. Ashley Holdings (WCAB)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 2023

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD), : : Respondents : ORDER PER CURIAM

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Egizio, R v. Consol PA Coal Co, LLC (WCAB)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 2022

    : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … Commonwealth Court : : CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL : COMPANY, LLC (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. D'Amato

    514 Pa. 471 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 1987

    Other residents observed a yellow or beige or light brown midsize car, possibly an Oldsmobile or a Pontiac, exiting the parking lot and the alley with its lights out and two males in the car. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 490 Pa. 560 , 417 A.2d 181 (1980).

    Cited 121 timesPublished
  • Dent, R. v. PPB

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 2023

    6 MM 2023 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Pig Iron Storage Warrant Co. v. Sinnemahoning Iron & Coal Co.

    205 Pa. 403 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1903

    J., in Brown v. Sims, 17 S. & R. 138, must control the case before us. It may be said that Brown v. … From that follows a long line of exceptional cases on similar facts down to Karns v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wescoe, K. v. FedChem, LLC (WCAB)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 2023

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … Commonwealth Court : : FEDCHEM, LLC AND STATE WORKERS' : INSURANCE FUND (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sealey, C. v. WCAB (Elwyn Inc.)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2021

    PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT CHARLES SEALEY : No. 690 MAL 2020 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cleavinger v. Reimar

    3 Watts & Serg. 486 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1841

    same year, valid, so that the Meredith warrant, which was granted on- the 23d of August in that year, was not void for that reason, as the board of property thought. … See also Hall v. Hallet, (1 Cox 134), where it is said, that upon principles of policy no attorney shall be permitted to purchase anything in litigation, of which litigation he has the management.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Caruccio, N. v. Shrewsbury Boro. (WCAB)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 2024

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : SHREWSBURY BOROUGH (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD),

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harold, M. v. Abate Irwin, Inc. (WCAB)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 2023

    PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT MARTIN HAROLD : No. 192 WAL 2022 : : v … (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD) : : : PETITION OF: MARTIN HAROLD :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Quigley, C. v. UCBR

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 2020

    Bd. of Review, 501 A.2d 1383 (Pa. 1985) by misapplying Lyness v. … State Bd. of Med., 605 A.2d 1204 (Pa. 1992) to improperly limit the scope of the Board’s review solely to the issues raised by the appellant?

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Weiller v. Pennsylvania R.

    134 Pa. 310 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1890

    Co. v. Brown, L. R. 8 App.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Coles, H. v. PBPP

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 6, 2020

    98 MM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION : AND PAROLE,

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Logan v. Cassell

    88 Pa. 288 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1879

    Burckmyer, 1 Gill. 127; Mauran v. Lamb, 7 Cowen 174; Dean v. Hewit, 5 Wend. 257 ; Brown v. Clark, 2 Harris 469; Pearce v. Austin, 4 Whart. 489 ; Holmes v. Paul, 6 Am. Law Reg. 482 ; Ballentine v. … McGeagh, 4 Brewst. 95; Way v. Richardson, 3 Gray 412 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lessee of Steinmetz v. Young

    2 Binn. 520 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 1810

    But in the-year 1767, the board of property made an order, that no survey should be accepted, containing more than ten per cent, surplus above the quantity called for by the warrant, with the usual allowance of six per cent … An act of assembly to the same effect was made in April 1785; but as it has been expressly decided by this court in the case of M'Ginnis’s Lessee v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.