Case law

Tiano, B. v. City of Phila. (WCAB)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 2024

WCAB (Annunziata), 838 A.2d 598, 602- 03 (Pa. 2003), Oliver v. City of Pittsburgh, 11 A.3d 960 (Pa. 2011), Stermel v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia), 103 A.3d 876 (Pa. … Cmwlth. 2014), and Pennsylvania State Police v. Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd.

Commonwealth v. Arrington

624 Pa. 506 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 2014

Commonwealth v. Brown, 567 Pa. 272 , 786 A.2d 961, 971 (2001) (holding that the law presumes that the jury will follow the court’s instructions). … Commonwealth v. Brown, 567 Pa. 272 , 786 A.2d 961, 971 (2001). .

Marshall v. Carr

271 Pa. 271 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1921

To like effect are Ramsey v. Johnson, 3 P. & W. 293; Hoffman v. Kemerer, 44 Pa. 452 ; Com. v. Shanor, 29 Pa. Superior Ct. 358 . … The report of the Pardon Board was not competent evidence, and, as we understand the record, was not treated as such.

Commonwealth v. One Box Benedictine

290 Pa. 121 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1927

It was interpreted by this court in Com. v. Berdenella, 288 Pa. 510, 515 . … , shop, saloon, restaurant, boarding house, warehouse or public garage.

Peak, D., Aplt. v. PPB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 19, 2022

Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court entered : November 10, 2021 at No. 35 MD v … : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION : & PAROLE, : :

Mercalde v. Swissvale (WCAB) Pet of: Mercalde

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 2024

PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT JOHN MERCALDE : No. 231 WAL 2023 : : v … : Commonwealth Court BOROUGH OF SWISSVALE AND : EMPLOYERS' MUTUAL CASUALTY : COMPANY (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD

TRDS 441 Hector Ass., LP, Pet v. Conshohocken ZHB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 11, 2024

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : CONSHOHOCKEN ZONING HEARING : BOARD,

Rodrigue v. Curcier

15 Serg. & Rawle 81 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1826

In Shock v. M’Chesney, the court refused an amendment, by which an action of slander would be converted into an action for a malicious prosecution. So, in The Farmers and Mechanics’ Bank v. … We have therefore not restrained ourselves to carry a very strict construction, such as was made by the District Court, in the case cited from 2 Browne, 246, (Thackara v. Curren,) of which I cannot approve.

Barsky, J. T. v. UCBR, Pet

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 2022

Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION : BOARD OF REVIEW,

Donahue, K. v. PPB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 29, 2024

: No. 77 WM 2023 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, : : Respondent

Eitnier v. EREITZ CORP.

404 Pa. 406 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1961

The cases of Peirce Appeal, 384 Pa. 100 , 119 A. 2d 506 (1956) and Schneider, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 389 Pa. 593 , 133 A. 2d 536 (1957), support this general basic proposition. … In Cheswick Boro. v.

Thomas, C. v. PPB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 2024

3 WM 2024 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, :

Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.

309 Pa. 574 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 1932

Defendant appealed, and the compensation board sustained the appeal and set aside the award. … In McCauley v.

329 Prospect Ave v. St College ZHBPet. of SC Boro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 2020

THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT 329 PROSPECT AVENUE CORPORATION : No. 17 MAL 2020 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth : Court STATE COLLEGE BOROUGH ZONING : HEARING BOARD

Commonwealth v. Schuylkill Trust Co.

315 Pa. 429 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1934

Appellant also objects to the refusal of the board of finance and revenue to deduct the whole value of shares in the Philadelphia National Bank owned by it. … Commonwealth v. Standard Oil Company, 101 Pa. 119 , was a capital stock tax case and does not impinge upon our decision here. Dupuy v.

Jordan v. Kane

389 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 1957

Zeloyle v. Bettor, 371 Pa. 546, 552 , 91 A. 2d 901 (1952). Neither has the appellant a vested contractual right in his rate of compensation. … Philadelphia Civil Service Commission v. Eckles, 376 Pa. 421, 426 , 103 A. 2d 761 (1954).

Clapper, S., Pet v. Comm of PA (WCAB)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 2022

CLAPPER : No. 121 WAL 2022 : : v. … : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : (WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD

Martin, K. v. PBPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2020

95 WM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION : AND PAROLE,

Laughner v. Wally

269 Pa. 5 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1920

Jacobs and Wife, 68 Pa. 57 ); but he is so liable for joint property which he sells or takes for his own use as a purchaser: see Winton Coal Co. v. Pancoast Coal Co., 170 Pa. 437 ; Browning v. … Cover, 108 *8 Pa. 595 ; Gloninger v. Hazard, 42 Pa. 389 ; Gillis v. McKinney, 6 W. & S. 78 ; Steelman v. Doughty (Pa. Supreme Ct.), 5 W. N. C. 166.

Camp v. Corn Exchange National Bank

285 Pa. 337 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 1925

Appellants say the bill of lading is one commonly known as a “to be transported bill” and not a “received on board bill,” the latter showing the goods to be actually on board the vessel. … The letter and contract required shipment on or before August 15th, but did not require an “on board” *347 bill of lading.