Case law

Commonwealth v. One Box Benedictine

290 Pa. 121 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1927

It was interpreted by this court in Com. v. Berdenella, 288 Pa. 510, 515 . … , shop, saloon, restaurant, boarding house, warehouse or public garage.

Peak, D., Aplt. v. PPB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 19, 2022

Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court entered : November 10, 2021 at No. 35 MD v … : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION : & PAROLE, : :

Mercalde v. Swissvale (WCAB) Pet of: Mercalde

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 2024

PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT JOHN MERCALDE : No. 231 WAL 2023 : : v … : Commonwealth Court BOROUGH OF SWISSVALE AND : EMPLOYERS' MUTUAL CASUALTY : COMPANY (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD

TRDS 441 Hector Ass., LP, Pet v. Conshohocken ZHB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 11, 2024

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : CONSHOHOCKEN ZONING HEARING : BOARD,

Rodrigue v. Curcier

15 Serg. & Rawle 81 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1826

In Shock v. M’Chesney, the court refused an amendment, by which an action of slander would be converted into an action for a malicious prosecution. So, in The Farmers and Mechanics’ Bank v. … We have therefore not restrained ourselves to carry a very strict construction, such as was made by the District Court, in the case cited from 2 Browne, 246, (Thackara v. Curren,) of which I cannot approve.

Donahue, K. v. PPB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 29, 2024

: No. 77 WM 2023 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, : : Respondent

Thomas, C. v. PPB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 2024

3 WM 2024 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, :

Reilly v. Reilly

264 Pa. 103 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1919

The scaffold was about thirty feet in length, made from a ladder with a board laid across the rungs, the width thereof. … It is immaterial whether the scaffold was unsafe through faulty or unsuitable material or in its construction: Swartz v. Bergendahl-Knight Company, 259 Pa. 421 -428. The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

In re Anonymous No. 82 D.B. 84

8 Pa. D. & C.4th 514 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 4, 1990

([H] v. [Petitioner]; [I] v. [Petitioner] and [J] v. [Petitioner].) (N.T. 30-7; petitioner’s reinstatement questionnaire 10, 10a.) The [H] suit was also the subject of a complaint with Office of Disciplinary Counsel. … Philadelphia News Inc. v. Disciplinary Board, 468 Pa. 382 , 363 A.2d 779 (1976).

Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.

309 Pa. 574 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 1932

Defendant appealed, and the compensation board sustained the appeal and set aside the award. … In McCauley v.

329 Prospect Ave v. St College ZHBPet. of SC Boro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 2020

THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT 329 PROSPECT AVENUE CORPORATION : No. 17 MAL 2020 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth : Court STATE COLLEGE BOROUGH ZONING : HEARING BOARD

Jordan v. Kane

389 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 1957

Zeloyle v. Bettor, 371 Pa. 546, 552 , 91 A. 2d 901 (1952). Neither has the appellant a vested contractual right in his rate of compensation. … Philadelphia Civil Service Commission v. Eckles, 376 Pa. 421, 426 , 103 A. 2d 761 (1954).

Clapper, S., Pet v. Comm of PA (WCAB)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 2022

CLAPPER : No. 121 WAL 2022 : : v. … : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : (WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD

Camp v. Corn Exchange National Bank

285 Pa. 337 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 1925

Appellants say the bill of lading is one commonly known as a “to be transported bill” and not a “received on board bill,” the latter showing the goods to be actually on board the vessel. … The letter and contract required shipment on or before August 15th, but did not require an “on board” *347 bill of lading.

Hasbrouck Sand, Pets v. Oil Creek Twp. ZHB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 2022

Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court v … : : : OIL CREEK TOWNSHIP ZONING : HEARING BOARD, :

Bark, J. v. Sooner Steel, LLC, (WCAB)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 2022

PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT JOHN BARK : No. 149 EAL 2022 : : v … Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court SOONER STEEL, LLC (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD

Pennsylvania Stave Co.'s Appeal

225 Pa. 178 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 1909

The distinction between them is very clearly pointed out in a number of our cases, notably in Castle v. Reynolds, 10 Watts, 51 , and King v. Brooks, 72 Pa. 363 . … The cases cited, and to these may be added, Stephens v. Cowan, 6 Watts, 511 , and Fisher v.

Carter, N. v. PPB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 2023

136 MM 2022 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, :

Neilson's Appeal

230 Pa. 540 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 1911

Brown, was appointed by the *542 circuit court of Somerset county, Maryland, as a commissioner to examine witnesses in Philadelphia in a certain proceeding pending in that court. … The only decision upon the point at issue which has been cited to us is Miller v. Dowdle, 1 Yeates, 404 , decided in 1794, which, if it is to be given any weight, favors the appellants.

Wildee v. McKee

111 Pa. 335 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1886

Danforth, 6 Watts, 304 -6; Haldeman v. Martin, 10 Barr., 369; Hood v. Palm., 8 Id., 237-9. … by defendants of the several grievances thereinafter mentioned, he had deservedly earned and enjoyed the confidence and esteem of his neighbors and acquaintances; that he was enu *338 ploved as a teacher by the Central Board