Case law

Nadolsky, C. v. UPMC Altoona (WCAB)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 20, 2023

PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT CATHERINE NADOLSKY : No. 143 WAL 2023 : : v … : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court UPMC ALTOONA REGIONAL HEALTH : SYSTEM (WORKERS' COMPENSATION : APPEAL BOARD

Blount v. Philadelphia Parking Authority

600 Pa. 277 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 2009

See Summit Towne Ctr., Inc. v. … See E-Z Parks, Inc. v.

Sipes, S. v. UPMC Jefferson Regional (WCAB)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 2023

PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT SHERYL SIPES : No. 228 WAL 2022 : : v … : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court UPMC JEFFERSON REGIONAL HOME : HEALTH, LP (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD

Saied, H. v. WCAB (Menzies Aviation Grp)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 2022

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (MENZIES AVIATION GROUP

Hestonville Passenger Railway Co. v. Connell

88 Pa. 520 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 17, 1879

If, as in the case of the Railway Co. v. Hassard, 25 P. F. … The accident here complained of could not have happened but by the direct act of the plaintiff in his sudden and improper attemut to *524 board the car, and this when the car was moving slowly and when the driver had no reason

Smith, K., Aplt. v. Pa. B.P.P.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 17, 2023

: Appellant : : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION : AND PAROLE,

Randler, K., Aplt. v. PPB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 2024

: Appellant : : : v … : : : THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Grant, D., Aplt. v. PBPP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 2, 2024

GRANT, : No. 19 WAP 2023 Appellant V. … PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Appellee ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2024, as Appellant failed to file atimely brief, this

Kenney v. Altvater & Co. ex rel. Marks

77 Pa. 34 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1874

He was entitled to actual notice : Stoi*y on Part., § 161; Watkinson et al. v. Bank of Pennsylvania, 4 Wharton 482 ; Brown v. Clark, 2 Harris 469. … It establishes no such legal conclusion in other business relations : Tanner v. Hughes, 3 P. F. Smith 289. Hence in First Nat. Bank of Bellefonte v. McManigle, 19 P. F.

McKibbin v. Martin

64 Pa. 352 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1870

Woods, 5 S. & R. 275; Cadbury v. Nolen, 5 Barr 320; Linton v. Butz, 7 Id. 89; Haynes v. Hunsicker, 2 Casey 58; Chase v. Ralston, 6 Id. 539; Barr v. Reitz, 3 P. F. Smith 256; Benford v. Schell, 5 Id. 393. … Upon the sale of a single board, or of a cartload of boards, it would not do to set up a constructive delivery by marking, and letting it remain where it was until it was convenient to remove it.

PA Game Commission v. Internat'l Dev Corp

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 2022

Petitioner : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court v … : : : INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT : CORPORATION AND ATLANTIC : HYDROCARBON (BOARD

McLogie Properties Inc. v. Kidder Twp. ZHB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 2024

Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : KIDDER TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING : BOARD,

Carr, R. v. PennDOT & SCSC Appeal of: PennDOT

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 19, 2020

[J-77-2019] [MO: Mundy, J.] - 6  In Sacks v. … See Grutzmacher v.

Canon v. Sharon & Wheatland Street Railway Co.

216 Pa. 408 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1907

Justice Brown, The prosecution of the appellant for alleged embezzlement was instituted by Godfrey Morgan, the superintendent of the Sharon and Wheatland Street Railway Company. … In the recent case of Markley v. Snow, 207 Pa. 447 , this is fully discussed and the authorities cited in support of the rule announced. Among other well-considered cases in which this rule is recognized, is Carter v.

Richardson v. Patterson

368 Pa. 495 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1951

Levin, 357 Pa. 554 , 55 A. 2d 364 (1947) ; Miles v. Myers, 353 Pa. 316 , 45 A. 2d 50 (1946) ; Mulheirn v. Brown, 322 Pa. 171 , 185 A. 304 (1936) ; Griffith v. V. A. … Hall’s Motor Transit Co., 351 Pa. 200 , 40 A. 2d 458 (1945), where a tractor trailer skidded a *506 distance of 80 feet while rounding a curve and crashed into a tree driving motor through dash board; Cirquitella v.

Allebach v. DEPT. OF FINANCE AND REVENUE

546 Pa. 146 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1996

The Department’s Board of Appeals and the Board of Finance and Revenue sustained the Department’s action. The Allebachs filed a petition for review with the Commonwealth Court. … See East Norriton Medical Associates v. *152 Commonwealth, 168 Pa.Cmwlth. 421 , 650 A.2d 1169 (1994); Gumberg Associates-Chapel Square v. Commonwealth, 116 Pa.Cmwlth. 35 , 541 A.2d 401 (1988).

Spada, Z., Aplt v. Johnson, T.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 2023

No. 2 WAP 2022 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court entered v … : THEODORE JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN, : PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, : : Appellees :

Commonwealth v. Downs

334 Pa. Super. 568 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1984

North Carolina v. Pearce, supra.” Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165-166 , 97 S.Ct. 2221, 2225 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187, 194 (1977). … v.

Sturdevant v. Thomson

280 Pa. 233 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1924

The same principle was recognized in Timlin v. Brown, 158 Pa. 606 , and Hosack v. Crill, 18 Pa. Superior Ct. 90 . The case at bar is ruled in principle against appellants by Russell v. … Hunt, 276 Pa. 119 ; Stein v. W. H. Bradford Co., Inc., 278 Pa. 321 .

Ridge Turnpike v. Stoever

2 Watts & Serg. 548 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1841

Brown, (2 Penn. Rep. 462), that the only mode of collecting the tolls, is to demand and receive them at the gates, and they cannot be recovered by action. … This very point came up in the Supreme Court of Massachusetts, in the case of Tucker v. Tower, ( 9 Peck 109 ); and no authority to the contrary has been produced.