Case law

Barbieri v. Shapp

474 Pa. 613 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1977

Heimbach (Court of Common Pleas of Carbon County, Fifty-sixth Judicial District) having expired during the calendar year 1977 by reason of the mandatory retirement provision of Article V, Section 16(b), of the Constitution … that each of the above judicial offices be filled by election at the November 8, 1977, municipal election; *615 It is further ordered and directed that the Secretary of the Commonwealth give notice forthwith to the County Boards

Troiani Group v. Cty. of Pgh. BOA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 2022

Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court v … : : : CITY OF PITTSBURGH BOARD OF : APPEALS, AND CITY OF PITTSBURGH, :

Mullen, R. v. Northampton Twp. (WCAB)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 2023

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : NORTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD),

Randler, K., Aplt. v. PPB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 2024

: Appellant : : : v … : : : THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF : PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Senor v. Dunbar Township School District

307 Pa. 190 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1932

In Com. ex rel. v. Gruver, 13 Pa. … See also Com. ex rel. v. Scanlon, 202 Pa. 250 ; Jones v. Sharon Boro., 238 Pa. 35 , and Maurer v. Brennan, 58 Pa. Superior Ct. 587 .

W. G. Ward Lumber Co. v. American Lumber & Manufacturing Co.

247 Pa. 267 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 1915

Justice Brown, Under the testimony produced on the trial of this case the jury could not have avoided the finding that the W. E. … : Ward Lumber Co. v.

Abram, L., Aplt. v. PPB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 2024

LAMAROL ABRAM, : No. 32 WAP 2023 Appellant Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court entered V. … PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF AGENCY, Appellee ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 17th day of July, 2024, the order of the Commonwealth Court

El-Amin, M. v. PPB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 2022

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, :

Fernsler v. Moyer

3 Watts & Serg. 416 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1842

In Martin v. Payne, ( 9 Johns. 387 ), the father of the minor had made no contract of hiring, and the relation of master and servant existed only from the legal control he had over his daughter’s services. … It is said in South v.

Commonwealth v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

104 Pa. 89 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 1883

. > These several writs of error, having been taken to judgments entered under the Act of 22d April 1874, this court, under the ruling of Jamison v. Collins, 2 Norris 359, and Lee v. … Co. v. Commonwealth, 16 P. F. Smith 69, where Thompson, C.

Stadium Casino RE,LLC v. PGCB etal Petof: SC Gaming

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 6, 2023

PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT STADIUM CASINO RE, LLC : No. 43 MM 2023 : : v … : : : PENNSYLVANIA GAMING CONTROL : BOARD, SC GAMING OPCO LLC AND IRA : LUBERT

Spada, Z. v. PPB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 2023

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, :

Commonwealth v. Bickley

448 Pa. 319 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1972

See Commonwealth v. Swaney, 445 Pa. 244 , 284 A. 2d 732 (1971); and Commonwealth v. Brown, 436 Pa. 423 , 260 A. 2d 742 (1970).

In re Anonymous No. 58 D.B. 83

38 Pa. D. & C.3d 517 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 1984

It is the unanimous judgment of the Disciplinary Board that considering the forgery and the unlawful conversion of clients’ money anything less than disbarment would be inappropriate. V. … The Disciplinary Board further recommends that the costs be paid by. respondent.

City of Philadelphia v. Civil Service Commission

583 Pa. 413 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 2005

Compare Ruth Family Medical Ctr. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Steinhouse), 718 A.2d 397, 402 (Pa.Commw.1998) (characterizing section 422’s hearsay rule as “purely procedural”) and Dallas Cty. v. … . v.

Commonwealth v. Elliott

609 Pa. 499 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 2011

. § 9754 in its holding in Commonwealth v. Vilsaint, 893 A.2d 753 (Pa.Super.2006) and Commonwealth v. … . § 9798.3, enacted in 2007, which directs that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and County probation authorities in Megan’s Law may impose supervision conditions that include offender tracking.

Philadelphia Workingmen's Saving, Loan & Building Ass'n v. Wurzel

355 Pa. 86 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1946

The action of the board was therefore not sufficient to release or discharge Wurzel’s obligation. … We sustain the assignment of error complaining of the refusal of judgment n. o. v. Judgment reversed; record remitted with instructions to calculate the amount due and enter judgment for the plaintiffs for that amount.

Brownfield v. Mackey

27 Pa. 320 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1856

Every legal question raised on the trial of this cause was ruled by the learned President of the Common Pleas in strict conformity with the opinion of this court, as given in the case of Stach v. Mackey, 4 W. & S. 196 . … Brown with her assent, and the difficulty which was occasioned by non-payment of a part of the purchase-money had no effect upon the estate now in controversy. .

Stapas, J., Aplt. v. Giant Eagle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 2018

Armbruster v. Horowitz, 813 A.2d 698, 703 (Pa. 2002) (emphasis in original), quoting Commonwealth v. Brown, 648 A.2d 1177, 1189 (Pa. 1994) (additional citations omitted). … Armbruster, 813 A.2d at 703, quoting Brown, 648 A.2d at 1191.

Brown Estate

347 Pa. 244 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1943

But as pointed out by Justice Brown in Stinson’s Est., 228 Pa. 475 , which applies with equal force in the present case (page 479) : “The order of connection, however, must manifestly appear upon the face of the will; it … Harden, 6 Pa. 409 -413; Heise v. Heise, 31 Pa. 246 ; Churchill’s Est., supra; Dietterich’s Est., 127 Pa. Superior Ct. 315 .