Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

1.46s

  • Payne, E. v. Americold Logis. LLC (WCAB)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 2023

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : AMERICOLD LOGISTICS LLC (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD), :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pursglove v. Monongahela Ry.

    285 Pa. 27 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1925

    The switching engine had attached in front a head log, and to it a foot board was held in place by brackets. … In descending from the foot board, his raincoat caught on the end of the protruding bolt, resulting in a fall.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pitts. Junction R. R. Co. v. Pitts.

    352 Pa. 317 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1945

    Co. v. Pittsburgh , 221 Pa. 90 , 70 A. 271 ; Phila. v. Electric Traction Co. , 208 Pa. 157 , 57 A. 354 ; Phila. v. Phila. etc. R. R. Co. , 38 Pa. Super. 529 . … of Assessors, acting as a Board of Revision, of the City of Pittsburgh, in accordance with resolution duly passed by the Board of Assessors authorizing the City Solicitor and Joseph Kocurkovic, a member of said Board, to

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Slater, C. v. UCBR

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 24, 2024

    No. 88 EM 2023 : Petitioner : : : v … : : : UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION : BOARD OF REVIEW,

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Northeastern Pennsylvania Imaging Center v. Commonwealth

    613 Pa. 560 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2011

    Northeastern Pennsylvania Imaging Center v. … Medical Associates of the Lehigh Valley, P.C. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Gallagher v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    264 Pa. 29 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 17, 1919

    The finding of the referee, approved by the compensation board, was “at the time of the occurrence of the injury Gallagher was in the course of his employment with the defendant.” This is conclusive: Poluskiewicz v. … Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Company, 257 Pa. 305 ; Messinger v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Company, 261 Pa. 336 . Appeal dismissed and award affirmed.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Moran, Aplt

    629 Pa. 68 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 2014

    See Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Altamirano, J. v. UCBR

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 2022

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION : BOARD OF REVIEW,

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kratz, A. v. Dept of Corrections (WCAB)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 2023

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS : (WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roscoe, G. v. Cty. of Phila. (WCAB)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 2024

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : CITY OF PHILADELPHIA (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD),

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Morris v. Yough Coal & Supply Co.

    266 Pa. 216 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1920

    For the purpose of review, this court will examine the findings and reasons stated in the adjudication of the referee and the board, as also those on which the opinion of the common pleas is based: McCauley v. … We cannot substitute our judgment for that of the referee or the board, as the com *220 pensation act has delegated to them the exclusive function of determining these facts.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Mortimer, S. v. Andritz Herrvoss Stamco (WCAB)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 2024

    PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT SCOTT MORTIMER : No. 44 WAL 2024 : : v … : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court ANDRITZ HERRVOSS STAMCO : (WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Meals

    590 Pa. 110 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2006

    As this Court noted in Commonwealth v. … See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Davido, 582 Pa. 52 , 868 A.2d 431 , 442 n. 18 (2005); cf. McMahon v.

    Cited 158 timesPublished
  • Rambert, E. Aplt. v. PPB

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2026

    v. … : : : BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, : :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Vogel

    185 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1898

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Commissioners of Philadelphia

    2 Whart. 286 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1837

    Price v. The County Commissioners, ( 1 Whart. 1 ); and the reasons of it are obvious. The county commissioners are the officers elected by the people, under the laws, to superintend the finances of the county. … Witmer v. The Commissioners of Lancaster County, that they ought- not to draw orders on an empty treasury; and where the demands exceed the funds, it is an empty treasury as to some of them.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Protect PT, Pet v. Penn Twp ZHB

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 13, 2020

    : Commonwealth Court : : PENN TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING : BOARD, … : : Respondent : : : v

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson, E. v. DriverSource, Inc. (WCAB)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 14, 2022

    : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … (WORKERS' : COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD), : : Respondents : ORDER PER CURIAM

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hudson, B., Aplt. v. PPB

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 2024

    Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court entered : August 30, 2023 at No. 264 MD v … : 2021 : : PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION : AND PAROLE, :

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kirby v. Kirby

    248 Pa. 117 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 8, 1915

    Chief Justice Brown, When R. J. Kirby died, in December, 1900, he was indebted to Edgar Kirby, the plaintiff below and appellee, in the sum of $1,300, on a note dated April 13, 1896. … This is toó clear for further discussion, and their promise is not, therefore, within the statute of frauds: Nugent v. Wolfe, 111 Pa. 471 ; Elkin v. Timlin, 151 Pa. 491 ; Bailey v. Marshall, 174 Pa. 602 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.