Case law

Brown v. Thompson

156 Pa. 297 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1893

Judgment was entered on the bond by Brown as administrator of the obligee.

Pittsburgh Bridge Co. v. Brown

2 Monag. 341 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1889

Lessee of Brown v. Long

1 Yeates 162 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1792

Brown v. Ambridge Yellow Cab Co.

374 Pa. 208 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 28, 1953

v. … In Schwab v.

Painter v. Brown, Floyd & Co.

37 Pa. 460 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1861

Eor the reasons given for the affirmance of the judgment in the case of Painter v. Austin, this judgment must be affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

Woodwell & Co. v. Brown & Kirkpatrick

44 Pa. 121 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 1862

BroAvn & Kirkpatrick Avere judgment-creditors of Henry Brown and J. Steele, and upon executions issued against them, sold the real and personal estate of Henry Brown, and became the purchasers at sheriff’s sale. … The contracts were really for and in the name of Brown & Kirkpatrick, and were properly admitted; and so also was the declaration of Brown at the time, as explanatory of his acts in having the timber rafted into the water

Entriken v. Brown

32 Pa. 364 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1859

They all rest, however, on the case of Lloyd v. Williams, Hard. Cas. 123. … Nor has this case been followed, but on the contrary, it was very expressly repudiated in Stockham v. Jones, 10 Johns. 22 ; and in Wakely v. Hart, 6 Binn. 319 , in which C. J.

Brown v. Pendleton

60 Pa. 419 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 4, 1869

Robinson & Co. v. Wallace, 3 Wright 129 ; Baringer v. Stiver, 13 Id. 129 ; Hoffman v. Toner, Id. 231 ; Raybold v. Raybold, 8 Harris 311; Flick v. Devries, 14 Wright 266 . … Anderson, 6 Wright 311 ; Rush v. Vought, 5 P. F. Smith 438; Conrad v. Shomo, 8 Wright 193 . In Wieman and Wife v. Anderson the authorities are collated and examined very fully by Woodward, J., and in Baringer v.

Overseers v. Brown

13 Pa. 389 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1850

Dentler v. Brown

11 Pa. 295 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1849

Harper v. … Jefferies, 5 Wh. 26 , and Renshaw v. Grans, 7 Barr, 117. But neither of these supposed facts form a feature of the case.

Imhoff v. Brown

30 Pa. 504 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1858

S. v. Thayer, 2 W. & S. 443 ; Dewey v. Dupuy, 2 W. & S. 553 . Practically, it is common to file a statement, showing the amount claimed, or exhibiting a credit, or deducing title to the instrument. In Mahon v.

Brown v. Mutual Trust Co.

267 Pa. 523 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 17, 1920

Chief Justice Brown, The judgment from which we have this appeal by the plaintiffs was entered on a question of law raised in the affidavit of defense filed to the statement of their cause of action.

Brown & Vaughn Development Co. v. Commonwealth

393 Pa. 589 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 1958

What we said in Fisher v. … Black v. Troutman, Co., 385 Pa. 138 .

Halpern, M., Pets. v. Brown, J.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2016

: : Petitioners : : : v … BROWN, JR., ESQUIRE, AND : LYNNE BOGHOSSIAN, : : Respondents : ORDER

Brown v. Pine Creek Railway Co.

183 Pa. 38 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1897

Brown and Sarah Jane, his wife, in right of Sarah J. … The rule applicable is stated in Railway Co. v.

Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co. v. Brown

100 Pa. 338 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1882

Justice Field in Brumagim v. … The same general principle is recognized in some of our own cases : Hospital v. Philadelphia Co., 12 Harris 229; White v. Heylman, 10 Casey 142; Motz v. Mitchell, 10 Norris 114; and cases there cited.

Brown, M. v. CCP, Phila. Cty.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 2016

BROWN, 2 NO. 29 Ei\/| 2016 Petitioner COURT OF CO|\/|l\/|ON PLEAS PHiLADELPH|/-\ COUNTY, Respondent PER CUR|AM AND NOW, this 15th day of Apri|, 2016, the App|ication for Leave to Fi|e Origina| Process and the Petition

Brown v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

635 Pa. 215 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 2016

Brown, A. v. Hon., Moss, S.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 1, 2015

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT ALTON BROWN, : No. 23 EM 2015 : Petitioner … : No. 23 EM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v

Brown v. Quaker City Cab Co.

274 Pa. 289 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1922

While we find the record sustains the statement read, we have stated in Buehler v. U. S. Fashion Plate Co., 269 Pa. 428, 433 , how the pleadings, or parts of them, may become evidence in a case. … prejudice or sympathy, — whatever the. impelling motive, — if, under the circumstances, it is so out of proportion to the damages proven as to make necessary its being set aside as excessive, it will be so ordered: Gail v.