Case law

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tinari

649 A.2d 430 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1994

ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 1994, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated September 27, 1994, it is hereby ORDERED that NINO V. … It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E. *431 CASTILLE, J., did not participate in this matter. MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Harper v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad

219 Pa. 368 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1908

So that in this respect the present case is to be clearly distinguished from McGeehan v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. … As our Brother Fell said in Flanagan v. P., W. & B. R. R.

Auble's Administrator v. Mason

35 Pa. 261 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1860

Brown, since' deceased, who called himself her agent, and who paid part of the consideration at the time, and gave his check to be paid when the assignment was executed. … Good, 9 Harris 355; Hoar v. Axe, 10 Id. 334; Bradford’s Appeal, 5 Casey 515; Topley v. Topley, 7 Id. 328.

School District v. Pitts

184 Pa. 156 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1898

If accounts settled by the auditors show amounts different from those named in the certificate of the school board, the court would not fail to limit the execution accordingly. … So, also, trial of contested elections by the court: Ewing v. Filley, 43 Pa. 384 , and summary convictions: Byers v. Com., 42 Pa. 89 . See also Rhines v. Clark, 51 Pa. 96 ; Haines v. Levin, 51 Pa. 412 .

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tinari

538 Pa. 474 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1994

ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 1994, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated September 27, 1994, it is hereby ORDERED that NINO V. … . *475 It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E. CASTILLE, J., did not participate in this matter. MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

McMullin's Estate

272 Pa. 284 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1922

The company, through its board of directors, performs the obligations of its charter^ not the shareholders as such. … They are an intangible asset, created through federal laws: Com. v. Westinghouse, etc., Co., 151 Pa. 265, 275 ; Com. v. Edison Electric Light Co., 157 Pa. 529, 530 .

Wallace v. Trustees of the General Assembly of the United Presbyterian Church of North America

194 Pa. 178 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1899

“When rights of property are ixx questioxx, civil courts will ixxquire whether the organic rules and forms of proceeding prescribed by the ecclesiastical body have been followed:” O’Hara v. Stack, 90 Pa. 477 . … are retired each year and their places are filled at the annual meeting of the assembly, so that tlie board of trustees never dissolves.

Hinkle v. HJ Heinz Company

462 Pa. 111 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 19, 1975

Steel Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 10 Pa. Cmwlth. 247, 249, 309 A.2d 842 (1973); Carpinelli v. Penn Steel Castings Co., 209 Pa.Super. 390, 394 , 227 A.2d 912 (1967). … In Winkleman v.

In Re: Michael J. Sullivan, of: Sullivan, M.

628 Pa. 288 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 2014

See U.S. v. Sullivan, 2013 WL 3305217 (E.D. Pa. 2013). … [No. 128 EM 2014] - 2 U.S. v. Lowry et al., 2014 WL 5795575 at *1 (E.D. Pa. November 6, 2014) (opinion on post-verdict motions for judgment of acquittal or for a new trial).

Pokis v. Buck Run Coal Co.

286 Pa. 52 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 8, 1926

We do not agree with the interpretation placed by the board upon section 25, that it obviously refers to malicious and unwarranted interference with mine machinery. … This being so, the language in Walcofski v.

Commonwealth v. Hamlin

302 Pa. Super. 86 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 28, 1982

See Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 , 90 S.Ct. 1189 , 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970); Commonwealth v. Brown, 473 Pa. 458, 463 , 375 A.2d 331, 334 (1977) (citing cases); see generally Anno., 9 A.L.R.3d 203 (1966). … Commonwealth v. Brown, supra.

Parkinson's Appeal

32 Pa. 455 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1859

By the power to sell, the estate, under our Act of Assembly, was vested in the executors, subject to the life estate of the widow: Brown & Sterrett’s Appeal, 3 Casey 63. … Jane Kern had the whole beneficial title in two fourteenths vested in her, subject to her mother’s interest for life: Fletcher v. Ashburner, 1 Bro. C. C. 534.

Seifried v. Commonwealth

101 Pa. 200 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1882

v. … Keenan, 10 Phil. 194 ; State v. Hanly, 25 Minn. 429 ; Botto v. State, 26 Miss. 108 . The defendant’s point should have- been affirmed.

PSP NE, LLC v. PWAB Pet of: BLLC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 2024

MIDDLE DISTRICT PSP NE, LLC : No. 232 MAL 2023 : : v … How much risk must a developer bear to ensure that public funds do not “in part” pay for construction under 500 James Hance Court v. Pa.

In Re: Amendment of Rules 102, 104, 205, 206, 208, 209, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 301, 401 & 403 of PA Rules of Discipinary Enforcement & Rule 8.3 of Rules of Professional Conduct

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 2019

Note: In order to avoid the commingling of prosecutorial and adjudicative functions, which would be a violation of due process, see Lyness v. … by the Board, the [Secretary] Board shall notify the Supreme Court which shall appoint an Ad Hoc Disciplinary Board comprised of five former members of the Board who shall discharge the functions of the Board and have

In re Anonymous No. 142 D.B. 99

60 Pa. D. & C.4th 522 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 2001

[J], captioned [I] v. Dr. … Board Member Donohue recused herself. Board Members Caroselli, Schultz, Rudnitsky andTeti did not participate in the November 15, 2000 adjudication.

Hoffman v. Clough

124 Pa. 505 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 1889

It ■will be sufficient to cite a few recent cases in which it has been recognized and applied: Frazier v. Penn. R. Co., 38 Pa. 104 ; Caldwell v. Brown, 53 Pa. 453 ; Keystone Bridge Co. v. … New-berry, 96 Pa. 246 ; Lehigh Valley Coal Co. v. Jones, 86 Pa. 432 . The reasons on which this rule rests are stated with sufficient clearness in the cases just cited and there is no necessity for repeating them.

Commonwealth v. Riggins

478 Pa. 222 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1978

Commonwealth v. Brown, 388 Pa. 613 , 131 A.2d 367 (1957); accord, 5 Wigmore, Evidence § 1451(b) (Chadbourn rev. 1974). … Commonwealth v. Brown, supra, 388 Pa. at 617-18 , 131 A.2d at 369-70 (footnote omitted).

Respublica v. County Commissioners of Philadelphia County

4 Yeates 181 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1805

Bort, 2 Term R. 275, a case that was overruled in Leigh v. Kent, 3 Term R. 364. “ A proposition no better supported cannot prevail against the clear reasoning of “ Chief Justice Tilghman in Wright v. … The proposition came from the commissioners, and was acceded to by the board of inspectors, as a reasonable measure.

Egan v. Mele

535 Pa. 201 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1993

By order dated March 19, 1993, the trial court granted Egan’s Petition to Strike and affirmed the Board’s rejection of Appellant’s nominating petitions. … In re Jones, 505 Pa. 50 , 66 n. 16, 476 A.2d 1287 , 1295 n. 16 (1984) (citing Commonwealth, State Ethics Commission v. Baldwin, 498 Pa. 255 , 445 A.2d 1208 (1982)). .