Case law

Upper St. Clair Township Appeal

408 Pa. 416 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1962

This refusal was affirmed by the township board of adjustment and, on appeal by Yalicenti, the court below reversed and ordered the permit to issue, thereby giving rise to the instant appeal by the Township. … Cresko Zoning Case, 400 Pa. 467 , 162 A. 2d 219 (1960); Richman v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 391 Pa. 254 , 137 A. 2d 280 (1958).

Wax v. International Mailers Union

400 Pa. 173 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1960

Gardner v. Allegheny County, 382 Pa. 88, 96 , 114 A. 2d 491 (1955) ; Jacobs v. Fetzer, 381 Pa. 262 , 112 A. 2d 356 (1955) ; Fineman v. Cutler, 273 Pa. 189, 193 , 116 Atl. 819 (1922). … Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236, 245 , 79 S. Ct. 773 , 3 L. Ed. 2d 775 (1959), citing Garner v. Teamsters C. & H. Local Union, 346 U.S. 485 , 74 S. Ct. 161 , 98 L. Ed. 228 (1953) and Weber v.

Pennsylvania Coal Co.'s Assessment

257 Pa. 320 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1917

Following a rule of uniformity, they reduced it to $300 per foot acre for assessment purposes, or $25 less than the valuation for the purposes of taxation fixed by the Board of Revision and Appeal. … It was for them to fix this "after the consideration of the evidence in the case and giving due regard to the weight thereof: Lehigh Valley Coal Co. v. Northumberland County Commissioners, 250 Pa. 515 .

Leedom v. Palmer

274 Pa. 22 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1922

April 1, 1916, he arranged for Palmer and his wife to rent the farm, for his board and farm taxes. … . & G. 597; Bigelow on Fraud, 368; Worrall's App., 110 Pa. 349, 364 ; Carney v. Carney, 196 Pa. 34, 38 ; Compton v. Hoffman, 265 Pa. 257, 263 ; Neureuter v. Scheller, 270 Pa. 80 ; Langdon v. Allen, 1 W. N.

Fire Ass'n v. Rosenthal

108 Pa. 474 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1885

In Brown v. … v.

Smith v. Primrose Tapestry Co.

285 Pa. 145 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 1925

When the petition to the board is of the former class, it must be presented within one year from the date of the accident. … Co. v. P. & R. C. & I. Co., 78 Pa.

In re Anonymous Nos. 78 D.B. 82 & 79 D.B. 82

33 Pa. D. & C.3d 94 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1985

Nor does it make acceptable for the Disciplinary Board to ignore or otherwise allow such practices to continue. … V. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania makes the following conclusions of law in this proceeding: 1.

Commonwealth v. Marchesano

519 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 1988

Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 , 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1983); Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972); Commonwealth v. … In Brown the issue was whether the Commonwealth could attempt to revoke a person's probation following the person’s acquittal on the charge which formed the basis of the alleged parole violation.

L. J. W. Realty Corp. v. Philadelphia

390 Pa. 197 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1957

Corp. v. Board of Finance and Revenue, 368 Pa. 463, 471 , 84 A. 2d 495 (1951). … Accord: Gallagher v.

Haldeman v. Pennsylvania Central Railroad

50 Pa. 425 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1865

By resolution of that date the board permitted Jacob M. … It was at most hut a license, and revocable at pleasure : Monongahela Navigation Co. v. Coons, 6 W. & S. 101 ; Susquehanna Canal Co. v. Wright, 9 Id. 9; Railroad Co. v. Young, 9 Casey 175.

Betters v. Beaver Cnty

213 A.3d 1001 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 2019

Green v. Commonwealth

601 Pa. 5 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 2009

Fitzpatrick v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.

389 Pa. Super. 438 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1989

Harring v. *446 Com., Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 70 Pa.Cmwlth. 173, 176 , 452 A.2d 914, 916 (1982) (disapproved on other grounds, Vann v. … Com., Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 508 Pa. 139 , 148 n. 2, 494 A.2d 1081 , 1085 n. 2 (1985)); see also Pratt v.

Ford v. A. E. Dick Co.

288 Pa. 140 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1926

In Kelly v. … In Flucker v.

Shankland's Appeal

47 Pa. 113 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 1864

We have so lately gone over the list of cases beginning with Fisher v. Taylor, 2 Rawle 33 , and ending with Brown v. … This contract seems to have proceeded on the ground that Kuhn v. Newman destroyed this trust, and placed an unlimited life estate in the cestui que trust, discharged of all restrictions.

Commonwealth v. Shoener

216 Pa. 71 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1906

Justice Brown, But little need be said in affirming this judgment. … The learned and careful trial judge correctly disposed of the questions raised by the appellant, and, in doing.so, understood what was said in Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Miller

442 Pa. 95 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1971

In Commonwealth v. Brown, 438 Pa. 52, 63 , 265 A. 2d 101, 107 (1970), quoting from Commonwealth v.

Gustine v. Westenberger

224 Pa. 455 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1909

Justice Brown, The defense in 'this case was that the mortgage was a forgery, and, under evidence that could not fairly have led to any other conclusion, the jury so found. … Cavender, 38 Pa. 334 ; Reineman v. Moon, 12 Pitts. L. J. (N. S.) 167; Smith, Executrix, v. Markland et al., 000 Pa. 000 .

Pgh History v. Ziegler, Appeal of: Hoffstot

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2019

In our decision in Cuker v. … See, e.g., Tracy v.

Bolton v. Stillwagon

410 Pa. 618 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1963

Sechler v. Sechler, 403 Pa. 1 , 169 A. 2d 78 (1961); Shydlinski v. … Trusts, §387; O’Neill v. O’Neill, 227 Pa. 334 , 76 A. 26 (1910); McLaughlin v. Fulton, 104 Pa. 161 (1883).