Case law

City of Phila., Aplt. v. Tax Review Bd.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2015

v. … See, e.g., Royal Bank of Pa. v. Commonwealth, 705 A.2d 515, 517 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998); Pa. Retailers’ Ass’ns v. PUC, 64 Pa. Cmwlth. 491, 502 n.12, 440 A.2d 1267, 1272 n.12 (1982); cf. Caver v. Cent. Ala. Elec.

McGill v. Leverington-Roxborough Savings & Loan Ass'n

444 Pa. 483 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1971

Bank v. Patterson, 442 Pa. 289 , 275 A. 2d 6 (1971). … See Calabrese v. Collier Twp. Mun. Auth., *489 430 Pa. 289 , 240 A. 2d 544 (1968); Commonwealth v. Glen Alden Corp., 418 Pa. 57 , 210 A. 2d 256 (1965); Food Fair Stores, Inc. v.

American Seating Co. v. Philadelphia

434 Pa. 370 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 1969

The Board entered into an agreement with a contractor for the construction of the building. … Examples of courts adopting this distinction are Kerr v. New Orleans, 126 F. 920 (5th Cir. 1903), City of Bradenton v. Fusillo, 134 Fla. 759 , 184 So. 234 (1938), and City of Hazard v.

Commonwealth v. Skipper

440 Pa. 576 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1970

Again, on November 8, 1965, appellant was paroled by the Pennsylvania Parole Board. … Washington v. Maroney, 427 Pa. 599 , 235 A. 2d 349 (1967).

Appeal of the Protestant Orphan Asylum

111 Pa. 135 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1886

Under such circumstances we cannot agree to proceed a single step beyond what is warranted by the case of Hammett v. Philadelphia. … Much has been said in the attempt to weaken the force of the point ruled in Hammett v.

Commonwealth v. Begley

566 Pa. 239 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 2001

V. … Additionally, Appellant, Jolene Brown, and Heather Brown each testified that on the morning of January 18, Appellant slept late and stayed at home with Jolene and Heather. N.T., 7/18/96, at 950-52.

Ford v. Kendall Bor. Sch. District

121 Pa. 543 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1888

The Board of Directors had been twice notified of this method of kindling fires by its janitor, and warned of the danger of pen *547 mitting its continuance; and though the matter seems to have been discussed by that body … The same rule has been held to apply to injuries resulting from the neglect of an employee of a city fire department; as also in the ease of any strictly public agent, or agent of a public charity: Boyd v.

Commonwealth v. Coles, E., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 2025

Nonetheless, Officer Struble was able to see one 1 Commonwealth v. Coles, 332 A.3d 1185 (Pa. 2025) (per curiam). of the individuals holding a smoking, brown cigar. … I dissent from the Court’s decision to dismiss the appeal as improvidently granted. 19 Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 53 (1979). 20 Commonwealth v.

Cronin v. American Oil Co.

298 Pa. 336 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1929

The referee and board so found, on testimony sufficient to justify this conclusion, and we have frequently held that, under such circumstances, the determination reached will not be interfered with: Johnston v. … Checker Cab Co., 288 Pa. 394 ; Meucci v. Gallatin Coal Co., 279 Pa. 184 ; Cawley v. American Ry. Express Co., 276 Pa. 160 ; Maguire v.

Hoy v. Angelone

554 Pa. 134 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 24, 1998

Amici also refer to the Commonwealth Court's decision in Brown Transport Corp. v. … In Kazatsky v.

Commonwealth v. Abington Memorial Hospital

478 Pa. 514 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1978

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Board of Finance and Revenue of Commonwealth, 368 Pa. 463, 471 , 84 A.2d 495, 499 (1951). … National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc., 322 U.S. 111, 130-31 , 64 S.Ct. 851, 860 , 88 L.Ed. 1170 (1944).

Stern v. Vic Snyder, Inc.

325 Pa. Super. 423 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 17, 1984

his services to the said Board of Directors and the said Salvatore Contino. … As we read the particular charge in question, the court first directed the jury to determine if the board of directors was dissatisfied, and if it was, did it give the board the right to terminate him under the contract.

Werenzinski v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

339 Pa. 83 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 1940

Dickson, 108 Pa. 6 ; Carpenter v. United States Life Insurance Company, 161 Pa. 9 ; United Security Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. Brown, 270 Pa. 264, 267; Young v. Hipple, 273 Pa. 439, 444 ; Steen v. Lowry, 85 Pa. … Mutual Aid Society v. McDonald, 122 Pa. 324 ; United Security Life Insurance & Trust Co. *86 v. Brown, 270 Pa. 264 ; Act of May 17, 1921, P. L. 682, section 412.

Commonwealth v. Martinez

301 Pa. Super. 121 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 1982

Commonwealth v. Brown, 280 Pa. Superior Ct. 303, 307 , 421 A.2d 734, 736 (1980). See also Commonwealth v. Wright, 259 Pa. Superior Ct. 293 , 393 A.2d 833 (1978); Commonwealth v. Hude, 256 Pa. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 280 Pa. Superior Ct. 303 , 421 A.2d 734 (1980).

Edwards v. Western Maryland Ry. Co.

268 Pa. 228 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1920

Chief Justice Brown, On an averment in its affidavit of defense, that the plaintiff had been guilty of laches in the prosecution of his action, the court below directed judgment of non pros. … Pennsylvania Railroad Company, 176 Pa. 172 ; Munley v. Sugar Notch Borough, 215 Pa. 228 , and Stewart v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Renfroe

886 A.2d 664 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 1, 2005

886 A.2d 664 (2005) OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Patricia M. RENFROE, a/k/a Patty M. Renfroe and Patty Michelle Renfroe, Respondent. No. 1066 Disciplinary Docket No. 3. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. … It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Weisfield v. Beale

231 Pa. 39 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1911

In support of this proposition, the author cites Brown v. Button Co. (U. S. C. App., 3d Circ.), 149 Fed. Repr. 48; 17 Am. Bankcy. Reps. 565. In the opinion of the court, by Archbadd, Dist. … Reps. 390, which was affirmed in Brown v. Button Co., 149 Fed. Repr. 48, the effect of sec. 17 as amended is considered.

Roberts v. Estate of Barbagallo

366 Pa. Super. 559 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1987

Northwood was a member of the West Penn Multilist Group (West Penn) which in turn was a member of the Greater Pittsburgh Board of Realtors (Board of Realtors). … In Aiello v.

Smith v. Smith

595 Pa. 80 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2007

In Berrington v. … In Brown v.

In re Anonymous No. 28 D.B. 77

10 Pa. D. & C.3d 414 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 1978

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania HENRY, Board Member, Pursuant to Rule 208(d) of the Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement (rules), the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of … CHARGE V — [F] In the fall of 1974, Mrs. [F] was referred by Mr.