Case law

Kleinbard, LLC v. Lanc. Co. DA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2023

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … (2) Did the lower courts misconstrue Yost v McKnight, 865 A.2d 979 (Pa.

Johnson v. COM., PA. BD. OF PROB. & PAR.

505 Pa. 569 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1984

JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. October 2, 1984. *570 William R. Hare, Asst. … Hendrickson v. Pennsylvania State Board of Parole, 409 Pa. 204 , 185 A.2d 581 (1962), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 817 , 83 S.Ct. 1713 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1041 (1963); Commonwealth ex rel. Sparks v.

McArthur v. Kitchen

77 Pa. 62 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1875

Miller v. … Brown, 5 Barr 291, which were overruled in Hole v. Rittenhouse, 1 Casey 491. In his opinion in this case, Chief Justice Lewis seeks to qualify rather than overrule Kite v. Brown.

Ladner v. Siegel

294 Pa. 368 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1928

Lancaster Co., 290 Pa. 448 ; Sloan v. Longcope, 288 Pa. 196 ; Devlin’s Est., 284 Pa. 11 ; Girard Trust Co. v. Motor Co., 291 Pa. 507 ; Brown’s Est., 289 Pa. 101 . … situations (Tanner v.

McCandless Township v. Wylie

375 Pa. 378 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1953

In Simpson v. … The word “liability” has been held to include an employe’s right to reinstatement after wrongful discharge: National Labor Relations Board v.

Meginnis & Swartz v. Nunamaker

64 Pa. 374 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1870

the 3d section of the Act of 1857 the vendor might before the sale have released all claim for damages, and that his vendee would then have no right of action against him on his covenant of warranty, according to Dobbins v. … Brown, 2 Jones 75 , that this demand cannot be supported. The consideration of such a release is the prospective advantage of the road to the land, and this the vendee would have enjoyed.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Buffington

584 Pa. 447 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 20, 2005

ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 20th day of September, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated June 22, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that JOHN V. … It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Wax v. International Mailers Union

400 Pa. 173 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1960

Gardner v. Allegheny County, 382 Pa. 88, 96 , 114 A. 2d 491 (1955) ; Jacobs v. Fetzer, 381 Pa. 262 , 112 A. 2d 356 (1955) ; Fineman v. Cutler, 273 Pa. 189, 193 , 116 Atl. 819 (1922). … Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236, 245 , 79 S. Ct. 773 , 3 L. Ed. 2d 775 (1959), citing Garner v. Teamsters C. & H. Local Union, 346 U.S. 485 , 74 S. Ct. 161 , 98 L. Ed. 228 (1953) and Weber v.

In re Anonymous No. 35 D.B. 76

4 Pa. D. & C.3d 780 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1977

HARRINGTON, Board Member, Pursuant to Rule 208(d) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement (rules), the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (board) herewith submits its findings and recommendations … Included in the hearing committee’s report was the recommendation as follows: “V — .RECOMMENDATION “In view of the past record of this Respondent and the present facts the hearing committee recommends in the interest of protection

Werenzinski v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

339 Pa. 83 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 1940

Dickson, 108 Pa. 6 ; Carpenter v. United States Life Insurance Company, 161 Pa. 9 ; United Security Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. Brown, 270 Pa. 264, 267; Young v. Hipple, 273 Pa. 439, 444 ; Steen v. Lowry, 85 Pa. … Mutual Aid Society v. McDonald, 122 Pa. 324 ; United Security Life Insurance & Trust Co. *86 v. Brown, 270 Pa. 264 ; Act of May 17, 1921, P. L. 682, section 412.

Strank v. Mercy Hospital of Johnstown

376 Pa. 305 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1954

It is also admitted that Mercy Hospital is a privately conducted institution, which receives no State aid, having a Board of Incorporators, a Board of Directors and a Board of Managers. … In Barker v.

Thomas v. Borden

222 Pa. 184 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 1908

Justice Brown, That there may be an end to these proceedings and that the appellant may know his bill was properly dismissed, we have concluded not to quash his appeal, though there are good reasons for doing so. … The answer is further responsive because it states the particulars of the transaction charged and inquired into by the bill: Eaton’s Appeal, 66 Pa. 483 ; Merritt v. Brown, 19 N. J. Eq. 286.

Repyneck v. TARANTINO

403 Pa. 300 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1961

Posh (Posh), who is the president, a member of the board of directors, and general superintendent of the Company, alleging that he was injured when he came into contact with the platform of a crane operated by a fellow employee … This belief is ill founded: Welser v. Ealer, 317 Pa. 182 , 176 A. 429 . Repyneck’s complaint states a common law cause of action in trespass for negligence.

Commonwealth v. Martinez

301 Pa. Super. 121 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 1982

Commonwealth v. Brown, 280 Pa. Superior Ct. 303, 307 , 421 A.2d 734, 736 (1980). See also Commonwealth v. Wright, 259 Pa. Superior Ct. 293 , 393 A.2d 833 (1978); Commonwealth v. Hude, 256 Pa. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 280 Pa. Superior Ct. 303 , 421 A.2d 734 (1980).

Donze v. Devlin

329 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 1937

Whether they established a prima facie case, taking the testimony in its most favorable light (Foley v. Wasserman, 319 Pa. 420 ; Burns v. Pittsburgh, 320 Pa. 92 ; Deemer v. … Without notice to the lessee the board of education awarded a contract for the demolition of the school building.

Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. Little

8 Watts & Serg. 207 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1844

or why sweep away the sequestration with the intermediate acts of the Board of Currency and its successors by unravelling the web to take up a dropt stitch which did.not injure the texture ? … In Appesley v. Ive, (Cro. Jac. 645), it was held that the reversal of judgment against a principal is no reversal of judgment against his bail.

Smith v. Smith

595 Pa. 80 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2007

In Berrington v. … In Brown v.

Weisfield v. Beale

231 Pa. 39 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1911

In support of this proposition, the author cites Brown v. Button Co. (U. S. C. App., 3d Circ.), 149 Fed. Repr. 48; 17 Am. Bankcy. Reps. 565. In the opinion of the court, by Archbadd, Dist. … Reps. 390, which was affirmed in Brown v. Button Co., 149 Fed. Repr. 48, the effect of sec. 17 as amended is considered.

Hanhauser v. Pennsylvania & New England Railroad

222 Pa. 240 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1908

Justice Brown, The judgment which the court below refused to open was against five terre-tenants, to whose rights, franchises, property and assets the appellant succeeded. … Tozier, 154 Pa. 410 ; Hall v. West Chester Publishing Company, 180 Pa. 561 ; Lawrence v. Smith, 215 Pa. 534 . The appellee demurred to it on eight grounds.

ALBERT v. LEHIGH C. & N. CO.

431 Pa. 600 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1968

Lehigh's claim of title is based upon the 1867 deed of Brown to Lehigh. … See also: Montgomery v. Meredith, 17 Pa. 42 (1851); Brown v. Hays, 66 Pa. 229 (1871); Nypen Corp. v. Sechrist, 138 Pa. Superior Ct. 361, 364 , 10 A. 2d 822 (1940); Bozitsko v.