Case law

Workingman's Loan & Building Ass'n v. Heaton

233 Pa. 173 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1911

Crum Lynne Iron & Steel Co., 208 Pa. 462 ; Gaynor v. Railroad Co., 189 Pa. 5 ; Allegheny County Work House v. Moore, 95 Pa. 408 ; Stoystown & Greensburg Turnpike Road Co. v. Craver, 45 Pa. 386 ; Curry v. … See Lynn v. Bldg. & Loan Assn., 117 Pa. 1 .

Commonwealth v. Gray

322 Pa. Super. 37 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 11, 1984

criminal charges; Regina Webster and Curtis Missien who are presently under criminal charges; and David Fryday who is presently under criminal charges (the information relating to Fryday confirmed in a statement by Gina Brown … Brown and Trp. John J. Monahan related the following to your affiant: On 18 January 1981 Mr. Brown and Trp. Monahan spoke with confidential informant #3.

Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington R. R. v. Quaker City Flour Mills Co.

282 Pa. 362 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 5, 1924

Waterson, 17 Wallace 596, 598; Terry v. Anderson, 95 U. S. 628, 632 ; Koshkonong v. Burton, 104 U. S. 668, 675 ; McGahey v. Virginia (In re Brown), 135 U. S. 662, 705 ; Bowden v. P., W. & B. R. R. … What would be reasonable in one class of cases would be entirely unreasonable in another”: McGahey v. Virginia (In re Brown), 135 U. S. 662, 701, 707 .

Sharpsville Furnace Co. v. Snyder

223 Pa. 372 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1909

In Winslow, Lanier & Co. v. … The same case was again in this court, Leonard’s Exrs. v.

Commonwealth v. Johnstown Redevelopment Authority

527 Pa. 71 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1991

At a regularly scheduled meeting of the board [of the Authority], board member Gentile asked if prior employees had been contacted regarding the Switchboard Operator/Typist opening. 16. … General Electric, supra, Winn v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. supra, Com., Dept. of Transp. v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Com’n, 510 Pa. 401 , 508 A.2d 1187 (1986), and Allegheny Housing, supra.

Meginnis & Swartz v. Nunamaker

64 Pa. 374 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1870

the 3d section of the Act of 1857 the vendor might before the sale have released all claim for damages, and that his vendee would then have no right of action against him on his covenant of warranty, according to Dobbins v. … Brown, 2 Jones 75 , that this demand cannot be supported. The consideration of such a release is the prospective advantage of the road to the land, and this the vendee would have enjoyed.

Commonwealth v. Cherney

454 Pa. 285 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 1973

Redevelopment Authority, 357 Pa. 329 , 54 A. 2d 277 (1947); Holgate Brothers Co. v. Bashore, 331 Pa. 255 , 200 A. 672 (1938). 6 See Pennsylvania Water & Power Resources Board v. … Allegheny County Board of School Directors, supra [best interest of the educational system] ; Pennsylvania Water & Power Resources Board v.

Crozer's Estate

337 Pa. 327 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 1939

by the board. … In the Superior Court, the proceeding was dismissed on the ground that the land, at the time, was not being used for public purposes and therefore was not exempt from taxation: Johnson et al. v.

Elmer v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

251 Pa. 505 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1916

He was, therefore, a passenger: McNulty v. Penna. R. R. Co., 182 Pa. 479 . … He should, therefore, on boarding the car enter the inside and remain there until he reaches his destination.

Babac v. Commonwealth

533 Pa. 96 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 17, 1993

Madigan Appeal

434 Pa. 361 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 1969

For as stated in Warren Borough Election, 274 Pa. 352 , 118 A. 256 (1922), quoting from Weaver v. … The petition’s other allegation of irregularity in the canvass of the election returns asserted that the Board of Elections of Cambria County improperly rejected a total of seven absentee ballots.

Drake's Appeal

233 Pa. 8 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 1911

If the authority conferred upon it should be abused, the power of a court of equity would be adequate to restrain the perpetration of a palpable wrong: Erie v. Reed, 113 Pa. 468 . Under the Act of April 19, 1889, P. … L. 37, an appeal lies to the common pleas from an assessment or valuation by county commissioners or a board of revision of taxes, but this is very different from classification.

Gorsline, B. v. Bd. of Sup. of Fairfield Twp

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2018

Commonwealth v. … See Marshall v.

Phillips v. Hall

160 Pa. 60 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1894

The small return thus produced by the investment of part of her separate estate, etc., in keeping a boarding house, belonged to hei’self and not to her husba-ud; and his creditors have no claim upon it. In Silveus v. … To the same effect are numerous other cases, among which are Wieman v. Anderson, 42 Pa. 311 ; Sixbee v. Bowen, 91 Pa. 149 ; Welch v. Kline, 57 Pa. 432 ; Wayne v. Lewis, 23 W. N. 441; Seeds v.

Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. Little

8 Watts & Serg. 207 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1844

or why sweep away the sequestration with the intermediate acts of the Board of Currency and its successors by unravelling the web to take up a dropt stitch which did.not injure the texture ? … In Appesley v. Ive, (Cro. Jac. 645), it was held that the reversal of judgment against a principal is no reversal of judgment against his bail.

McCandless Township v. Wylie

375 Pa. 378 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1953

In Simpson v. … The word “liability” has been held to include an employe’s right to reinstatement after wrongful discharge: National Labor Relations Board v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Buffington

584 Pa. 447 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 20, 2005

ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 20th day of September, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated June 22, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that JOHN V. … It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Lessee of Doughty v. Browne

4 Yeates 178 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1805

The court desired the counsel for the Brownes to begin. Accordingly Messrs. … Ib. 103. i8o CASES IN THE SUPREME COURT [Mar., [Doughty’s Lessee v. Browne et e contra.] The court stopped Mr. Milnor, who was prepared to answer the cases cited, and to cite his law authorities.

Com. v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.

951 A.2d 265 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 2008

951 A.2d 265 (2008) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, Philip Morris, USA, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, B.A.T.

Pieper v. Union Traction Co.

202 Pa. 100 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1902

Justice Brown, The record in this case does not disclose the reason why the court below entered the judgment of nonsuit, but we assume it was on the ground of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff. … In the reported cases, from Ehrisman v. East Harrisburg City Pass. Ry. Co., 150 Pa. 180 , down to Burke v. Union Traction Co., supra, there can be found no clearer case of contributory negligence.