Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.62s
Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare v. Eisenberg
499 Pa. 530 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1982
See Borough of Green Tree v. Board of Property Assessments, 459 Pa. 268 , 328 A.2d 819 (1974). … of Arbitration of Claims, now the Board of Claims. .
Cited 30 timesPublishedHite v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
396 Pa. Super. 82 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 1990
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 225 N.J.Super. 375 , 542 A.2d 919 (1988) (cause of action alleging design defect not preempted). … American Brands, Inc., supra; Dewey v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., supra. Appellant in the instant case does not contend that a better design is available for the cigarette company’s product.
Cited 21 timesPublished962 A.2d 631 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 2009
962 A.2d 631 (2009) Linda MURETIC, Appellant v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY), Appellees. No. 57 MAP 2008. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 3, 2008. … Lengler, Esq., PA Department of Labor & Industry, Harrisburg, for Workers' Compensation Appeal Board. Michael F.
Cited 0 timesPublished484 Pa. 217 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1979
Brown, 467 Pa. 388 , 357 A.2d 147 (1976). … See Johnson v.
Cited 32 timesPublishedChandler v. Glover's Administrator
32 Pa. 509 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1859
It has -repeatedly been decided, that such a promise will not overcome the bar of the statute of limitations, unless accompanied by proof of ability to pay: Tompkins v. Brown, 1 Denio 247 ; Tanner v. … Accordingly, it has been ruled in New York, in Everson v.
Cited 1 timesPublished239 Pa. 312 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 1913
Justice Brown, We cannot learn from the record in this case whether *313 the nonsuit was entered on the ground of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff or because no negligence had been shown on the part of the defendant … If be bad done so, bis testimony on this point might have been of value: Keiser v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, 212 Pa. 409 .
Cited 7 timesPublished421 Pa. 492 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1966
Plaintiff cites Kelley v. Earle, 320 Pa. 449 , 182 Atl. 501 (1936); Lesser v. Warren Borough, 237 Pa. 501 , 85 Atl. 839 (1912); and Brown v. … Also named as defendants in the complaint were the Mayor of. the City of Pittsburgh, members of the City Council, the Director of Parks and Recreation, and the members of the Board of Directors of the Stadium Authority.
Cited 23 timesPublished411 Pa. 397 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1963
The basis of this contention is that the board of view awarded plaintiff a verdict of $56,000, whereas the jury awarded only one-half of that sum, namely $28,000. … v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2025
Refractories Co. v. DEP, 2000 EHB 707, 715 (emphasis added). … See id. at 152-56 (relying on Bordentown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones
72 Pa. D. & C.4th 98 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 2004
V. RECOMMENDATION The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously recommends that the respondent, Floyd Paul Jones, be disbarred from the practice of law. … Board Member Nordenberg did not participate in the September 27, 2004 adjudication.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohnson v. Abbotts Alderney Dairies
295 Pa. 548 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 1928
As stated in Kuehne v. … It is unlike McAvoy v. Kromer, 277 Pa. 196 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedHogue v. American Steel Foundries
247 Pa. 12 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 1915
In one of our latest cases on the subject, Kelly v. … What constitutes internal management is well defined by Stone, J., in North State Copper & Gold Mining Company v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedBrickhouse v. Spring-Ford Area School District
540 Pa. 176 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1995
Brickhouse appealed the board’s decision and requested a trial de novo and, in the alternative, leave to appeal nunc pro tunc. … Graham v.
Cited 27 timesPublished372 Pa. 77 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 6, 1952
Since the Legislature may not authorize such a procedure, it naturally follows that a township board of commissioners may not do it on its own. … The appellant cites the case of Haldeman v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedChestnut Street Trust & Saving Fund Co. v. Record Publishing Co.
227 Pa. 235 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1910
In the recent case of the First National Bank v. … of such conduct of the agent as raises a clear presumption that he would not communicate the fact in controversy, as where the agent acts for himself in his own interest and adversely to that of the principal:” Gunster v.
Cited 30 timesPublishedW. Homestead Bsd v. Alleg. Co. B. of SD
440 Pa. 113 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1970
Caplan v. Keystone Weaving Mills, Inc., 431 Pa. 407 , 246 A. 2d 384 (1968); Reynolds Metal *117 Co. v. Berger, 423 Pa. 360 , 223 A. 2d 855 (1966); Nachod v. Nachod, 402 Pa. 60 , 166 A. 2d 18 (1960). … Our Court has discussed the powers of the State and County Boards in Chartiers Valley Joint Schools v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEastern Univ. Acad. C.S., Aplt. v. S.D. of Phila.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 2021
Commonwealth Court entered on : July 10, 2020 (reargument denied : September 11, 2020) at 1167 CD v … The pertinent statutory language provides: “During the term of the charter or at the end of the term of the charter, the local board of school directors may choose to revoke or not to renew the charter[.]” 24 P.S. §17-1729
Cited 0 timesPublished471 Pa. 201 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1977
Commonwealth v. Hayes, 205 Pa.Super. 338 , 209 A.2d 38 (1965) ; Commonwealth v. Harbaugh, 197 Pa.Super. 587 , 179 A.2d 656 (1962); Commonwealth v. Brown, 192 Pa.Super. 498 , 162 A.2d 13 (1960); Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 192 Pa.Super. 498 , 162 A.2d 13 (1960).
Cited 89 timesPublished343 Pa. Super. 514 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1985
BROWN: Q. Who provided that to you? A. Ed Stewart. N.T., January 11, 12 and 13, at 59-60. (3) Appellant also complains of Mr. … BROWN: To the question, Your Honor? THE COURT: The answer is not responsive to the question. I am going to direct the answer be stricken.
Cited 15 timesPublished8 Watts & Serg. 340 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1845
Hylton’s Lessee v. Brown, ( 2 Wash. C. … Taylor Atkyns v. Horde, (1 Burr. 60).
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna