Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.29s
Attorney T. v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel
519 Pa. 280 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 1988
McLaughlin v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., 465 Pa. 104 , 848 A.2d 376 (1975). … (No. 81 DB 87, Disciplinary Counsel v. Attorney T.). .
Cited 4 timesPublished356 Pa. 54 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1946
On November 23, 1944, the minor and his employer, the defendant, entered into a written compensation agreement (later amended), approved by the minor’s parents and their counsel and by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. … Parents are next of kin: Pettigrew v. Pettigrew, 207 Pa. 313, 319 , 56 A. 878 . The rights of parents rise no higher than those of their children: Delaney v.
Cited 3 timesPublished3 Watts & Serg. 272 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1842
It was said, in Brown v. Sutter, ( 1 Dall. 239 ), that a judgment will not be opened to let in the statute of limitations; but as the plea of that statute has since been considered, in Shock v. … M’Chesney, ( 4 Yeates 507 ), and The Bank v. Israel, ( 6 Serg. & Rawle 294 ), to be no longer i an unconscionable one, the rule of practice would scarce be held so now.
Cited 1 timesPublished221 Pa. 131 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1908
Justice Brown, Cornelius C. Y. Crawford died August 16, 1905, intestate, and without issue, leaving a widow and collateral heirs. … To the same effect is Overdeer v. Updegraff, 69 Pa. 110 ; De Haven’s App., 106 Pa. 612 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedColonial Trust Co. Tr. v. L. D. A. Corp. K. W. Moore
299 Pa. 117 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1929
Consolidated Rubber Co., 284 Pa. 444 ; Schmidt & Friday’s Appeal, 82 Pa. 524 ; Faulkner et al. v. Wilson (Pa.), 3 W. N. C. 339; Brown v. Brown, *123 8 Pa. Dist. R. 365; Washburn v. … And see Horner v. Scott, 242 Pa. 432 ; Coyne et al. v. Souther, 61 Pa. 455 .
Cited 16 timesPublishedJ.S. v. Manheim Twp. SD, Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2021
Commonwealth Court dated May 13, : 2020 at No. 341 CD 2019 Affirming : the Order of the Lancaster County v … The majority contends disagreement between the School District and SBA regarding the subpoena power of school boards militates against resolving the due process question in the present appeal.
Cited 0 timesPublished396 Pa. 592 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1959
In Rand v. … The error of the jurisdictional ruling in Philadelphia County Election Board v. Rader, supra, is patent. Henceforth that decision must be considered as overruled.
Cited 87 timesPublishedSCRANTON BD. OF ZONING APPEALS v. Silas
393 Pa. 10 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 1958
393 Pa. 10 (1958) Scranton Board of Zoning Appeals, Appellant, v. Silas. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 1, 1958. May 26, 1958. *11 Before JONES, C.J., MUSMANNO, ARNOLD, JONES and COHEN, JJ. James K. … The Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Euclid Village v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMartin Jr., R. v. Donegal Twp., Aplts.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 2024
TAMMI IAMS : : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court entered April v … COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS : : ARGUED: April 10, 2024 : APPEAL OF: DONEGAL TOWNSHIP,
Cited 0 timesPublishedFrank N. Shaffer Fmly. v. Zhb of Chanceford
989 A.2d 5 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 2010
SHAFFER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and Kevin and Kendra Shaffer, Appellants v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF CHANCEFORD TOWNSHIP, Appellee, Chanceford Township, Intervenor. No. 67 MAP 2009. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. … Michael Craley, Red Lion, for Zoning Hearing Board of Chanceford Township. Stephen J.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAdoption of Rule 403 of the PA Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 2018
Prior to the commencement of services described in (d), the emeritus attorney shall submit an Eligible Legal Aid Organization Form to the Secretary of the Board for approval. … jurisdictions; (iv) Verification that the attorney is authorized solely to provide pro bono services to eligible legal aid organizations; (v)
Cited 0 timesPublishedLorino, V., Aplt. v. WCAB (Commonwealth of PA)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 2021
(COMMONWEALTH OF : Board at No. … [J-58-2021] - 3 Appellant and Employer both sought further review before the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (“Board”). The Board affirmed the WCJ’s decision, concluding that, based on Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublished202 Pa. 71 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1902
In Lindsley v. … Sprecher, 2 Yeates, 162 , Hortz v. Quigley, 1 Binn. 222 , and Brown v. Ridgeway, 10 Barr, 42. To the same effect are Philadelphia & Reading Railroad Co. v. Snowden, 161 Pa. 201 , and First National Bank v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedIn re Anonymous No. 69 D.B. 89
7 Pa. D. & C.4th 125 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1990
[B] v. [P] (31) On April 22, 1988, respondent initiated an action by writ of summons, [B], Plaintiff v. … (See section 85.8(a)(2), Disciplinary Board Rules).
Cited 0 timesPublishedGulnac v. South Butler County School District
526 Pa. 483 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1991
The South Butler County School District Board of School Directors, at no time, sought an injunction restraining the work stoppage. … Inc. v. O’Malley, 108 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 1, 528 A.2d 716 (1987); Pa. Independent Petroleum Producers v.
Cited 76 timesPublished488 Pa. 38 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 1979
In Jones v. … See Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973). In Rakas , the court explicitly stated that Jones was correct on its facts.
Cited 29 timesPublished6 Watts & Serg. 399 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1843
Smyth v. Hawthorn, ( 3 Rawle 356 ). … This was the law, as laid down by Lord Mansfield in Tindal v. Brown, since adopted and recognised by this court in Brittain v. The Doylestown Bank, ( 5 Watts & Serg. 98 ). Judgment affirmed.
Cited 4 timesPublished484 Pa. 217 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1979
Brown, 467 Pa. 388 , 357 A.2d 147 (1976). … See Johnson v.
Cited 32 timesPublished428 Pa. 461 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1968
Perloff Bros. v. Cardonick, 406 Pa. 137 , 176 A. 2d 413 (1962). It also is fundamental that all of the parties are entitled to a hearing before such an injunction should issue. 1 See Kittanning Brewing Co. v. … American Natural Gas Co., 224 Pa. 129 , 73 A. 174 (1909) ; Varzaly v. Yuhasz, 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 314 , 193 A. 63 (1937); 10 Anderson, Penna. Civil Practice 400 (1954). See also, Allegheny County v.
Cited 19 timesPublished30 Pa. 346 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1858
Brown, 12 Harris 310. … So in Watt & Co. v. Hoch, 1 Casey 411.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna