Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

2.29s

  • Attorney T. v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

    519 Pa. 280 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 1988

    McLaughlin v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., 465 Pa. 104 , 848 A.2d 376 (1975). … (No. 81 DB 87, Disciplinary Counsel v. Attorney T.). .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Santucci v. Frank

    356 Pa. 54 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1946

    On November 23, 1944, the minor and his employer, the defendant, entered into a written compensation agreement (later amended), approved by the minor’s parents and their counsel and by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. … Parents are next of kin: Pettigrew v. Pettigrew, 207 Pa. 313, 319 , 56 A. 878 . The rights of parents rise no higher than those of their children: Delaney v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ekel v. Snevily

    3 Watts & Serg. 272 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1842

    It was said, in Brown v. Sutter, ( 1 Dall. 239 ), that a judgment will not be opened to let in the statute of limitations; but as the plea of that statute has since been considered, in Shock v. … M’Chesney, ( 4 Yeates 507 ), and The Bank v. Israel, ( 6 Serg. & Rawle 294 ), to be no longer i an unconscionable one, the rule of practice would scarce be held so now.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Crawford's Estate

    221 Pa. 131 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1908

    Justice Brown, Cornelius C. Y. Crawford died August 16, 1905, intestate, and without issue, leaving a widow and collateral heirs. … To the same effect is Overdeer v. Updegraff, 69 Pa. 110 ; De Haven’s App., 106 Pa. 612 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Colonial Trust Co. Tr. v. L. D. A. Corp. K. W. Moore

    299 Pa. 117 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1929

    Consolidated Rubber Co., 284 Pa. 444 ; Schmidt & Friday’s Appeal, 82 Pa. 524 ; Faulkner et al. v. Wilson (Pa.), 3 W. N. C. 339; Brown v. Brown, *123 8 Pa. Dist. R. 365; Washburn v. … And see Horner v. Scott, 242 Pa. 432 ; Coyne et al. v. Souther, 61 Pa. 455 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • J.S. v. Manheim Twp. SD, Aplt.

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2021

    Commonwealth Court dated May 13, : 2020 at No. 341 CD 2019 Affirming : the Order of the Lancaster County v … The majority contends disagreement between the School District and SBA regarding the subpoena power of school boards militates against resolving the due process question in the present appeal.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bell Appeal

    396 Pa. 592 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1959

    In Rand v. … The error of the jurisdictional ruling in Philadelphia County Election Board v. Rader, supra, is patent. Henceforth that decision must be considered as overruled.

    Cited 87 timesPublished
  • SCRANTON BD. OF ZONING APPEALS v. Silas

    393 Pa. 10 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 1958

    393 Pa. 10 (1958) Scranton Board of Zoning Appeals, Appellant, v. Silas. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 1, 1958. May 26, 1958. *11 Before JONES, C.J., MUSMANNO, ARNOLD, JONES and COHEN, JJ. James K. … The Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Euclid Village v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Martin Jr., R. v. Donegal Twp., Aplts.

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 2024

    TAMMI IAMS : : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court entered April v … COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS : : ARGUED: April 10, 2024 : APPEAL OF: DONEGAL TOWNSHIP,

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frank N. Shaffer Fmly. v. Zhb of Chanceford

    989 A.2d 5 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 2010

    SHAFFER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and Kevin and Kendra Shaffer, Appellants v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF CHANCEFORD TOWNSHIP, Appellee, Chanceford Township, Intervenor. No. 67 MAP 2009. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. … Michael Craley, Red Lion, for Zoning Hearing Board of Chanceford Township. Stephen J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Adoption of Rule 403 of the PA Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 2018

    Prior to the commencement of services described in (d), the emeritus attorney shall submit an Eligible Legal Aid Organization Form to the Secretary of the Board for approval. … jurisdictions; (iv) Verification that the attorney is authorized solely to provide pro bono services to eligible legal aid organizations; (v)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lorino, V., Aplt. v. WCAB (Commonwealth of PA)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 2021

    (COMMONWEALTH OF : Board at No. … [J-58-2021] - 3 Appellant and Employer both sought further review before the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (“Board”). The Board affirmed the WCJ’s decision, concluding that, based on Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bellah v. Poole

    202 Pa. 71 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1902

    In Lindsley v. … Sprecher, 2 Yeates, 162 , Hortz v. Quigley, 1 Binn. 222 , and Brown v. Ridgeway, 10 Barr, 42. To the same effect are Philadelphia & Reading Railroad Co. v. Snowden, 161 Pa. 201 , and First National Bank v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Anonymous No. 69 D.B. 89

    7 Pa. D. & C.4th 125 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1990

    [B] v. [P] (31) On April 22, 1988, respondent initiated an action by writ of summons, [B], Plaintiff v. … (See section 85.8(a)(2), Disciplinary Board Rules).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gulnac v. South Butler County School District

    526 Pa. 483 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1991

    The South Butler County School District Board of School Directors, at no time, sought an injunction restraining the work stoppage. … Inc. v. O’Malley, 108 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 1, 528 A.2d 716 (1987); Pa. Independent Petroleum Producers v.

    Cited 76 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Evans

    488 Pa. 38 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 1979

    In Jones v. … See Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973). In Rakas , the court explicitly stated that Jones was correct on its facts.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Wardell

    6 Watts & Serg. 399 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1843

    Smyth v. Hawthorn, ( 3 Rawle 356 ). … This was the law, as laid down by Lord Mansfield in Tindal v. Brown, since adopted and recognised by this court in Brittain v. The Doylestown Bank, ( 5 Watts & Serg. 98 ). Judgment affirmed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Waldman

    484 Pa. 217 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1979

    Brown, 467 Pa. 388 , 357 A.2d 147 (1976). … See Johnson v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Pubusky v. D.M.F., Inc.

    428 Pa. 461 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1968

    Perloff Bros. v. Cardonick, 406 Pa. 137 , 176 A. 2d 413 (1962). It also is fundamental that all of the parties are entitled to a hearing before such an injunction should issue. 1 See Kittanning Brewing Co. v. … American Natural Gas Co., 224 Pa. 129 , 73 A. 174 (1909) ; Varzaly v. Yuhasz, 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 314 , 193 A. 63 (1937); 10 Anderson, Penna. Civil Practice 400 (1954). See also, Allegheny County v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Adams v. Palmer

    30 Pa. 346 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1858

    Brown, 12 Harris 310. … So in Watt & Co. v. Hoch, 1 Casey 411.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.