Case law

Strock v. County of Cumberland

176 Pa. 59 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 28, 1896

In Faas v. … In McCormick v.

Frank N. Shaffer Fmly. v. Zhb of Chanceford

989 A.2d 5 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 2010

SHAFFER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and Kevin and Kendra Shaffer, Appellants v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF CHANCEFORD TOWNSHIP, Appellee, Chanceford Township, Intervenor. No. 67 MAP 2009. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. … Michael Craley, Red Lion, for Zoning Hearing Board of Chanceford Township. Stephen J.

Adoption of Rule 403 of the PA Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 2018

Prior to the commencement of services described in (d), the emeritus attorney shall submit an Eligible Legal Aid Organization Form to the Secretary of the Board for approval. … jurisdictions; (iv) Verification that the attorney is authorized solely to provide pro bono services to eligible legal aid organizations; (v)

Lorino, V., Aplt. v. WCAB (Commonwealth of PA)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 2021

(COMMONWEALTH OF : Board at No. … [J-58-2021] - 3  Appellant and Employer both sought further review before the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (“Board”). The Board affirmed the WCJ’s decision, concluding that, based on Dr.

Columbia National Bank v. Dunn

207 Pa. 548 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1904

Out of innumerable authorities supporting this, reference is made to the following : Kelsey v. Murphy, 26 Pa. 78 ; Williams v. Row, 62 Pa. 118 ; Westcott v. Edmunds, 68 Pa. 34 ; Weigley v. … Coffman, 144 Pa. 489 ; Larkins v. Lindsay, 205 Pa. 534 .

Bellah v. Poole

202 Pa. 71 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1902

In Lindsley v. … Sprecher, 2 Yeates, 162 , Hortz v. Quigley, 1 Binn. 222 , and Brown v. Ridgeway, 10 Barr, 42. To the same effect are Philadelphia & Reading Railroad Co. v. Snowden, 161 Pa. 201 , and First National Bank v.

In re Anonymous No. 69 D.B. 89

7 Pa. D. & C.4th 125 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1990

[B] v. [P] (31) On April 22, 1988, respondent initiated an action by writ of summons, [B], Plaintiff v. … (See section 85.8(a)(2), Disciplinary Board Rules).

Commonwealth v. Evans

488 Pa. 38 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 1979

In Jones v. … See Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973). In Rakas , the court explicitly stated that Jones was correct on its facts.

Jones v. Wardell

6 Watts & Serg. 399 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1843

Smyth v. Hawthorn, ( 3 Rawle 356 ). … This was the law, as laid down by Lord Mansfield in Tindal v. Brown, since adopted and recognised by this court in Brittain v. The Doylestown Bank, ( 5 Watts & Serg. 98 ). Judgment affirmed.

Pubusky v. D.M.F., Inc.

428 Pa. 461 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1968

Perloff Bros. v. Cardonick, 406 Pa. 137 , 176 A. 2d 413 (1962). It also is fundamental that all of the parties are entitled to a hearing before such an injunction should issue. 1 See Kittanning Brewing Co. v. … American Natural Gas Co., 224 Pa. 129 , 73 A. 174 (1909) ; Varzaly v. Yuhasz, 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 314 , 193 A. 63 (1937); 10 Anderson, Penna. Civil Practice 400 (1954). See also, Allegheny County v.

Adams v. Palmer

30 Pa. 346 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1858

Brown, 12 Harris 310. … So in Watt & Co. v. Hoch, 1 Casey 411.

N. Y., L. E. & W. R. v. Lyons

119 Pa. 324 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1888

under no duty to board- it. … It is sufficient for present purposes to refer to Mansfield Coal Co. v.

Commonwealth v. Barnes & Tucker Co.

472 Pa. 115 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1977

See, e. g., Erie Railroad Company v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 254 U.S. 394 , 41 S.Ct. 169 , 65 L. Ed. 322 (1921); Hadacheck v. … See Commonwealth v. Barnes & Tucker Co., 9 Pa.Cmwlth. 1, 7 , 303 A.2d 544 (1973). 5 . Prior to the Act of December 3, 1970, P.L. 834, § 30, 71 P.S. § 510-103, the Sanitary Water Board was responsible for mine drainage.

Buggs v. STATE OFFICIALS, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

965 A.2d 243 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 2009

965 A.2d 243 (2009) John BUGGS, Appellant v. STATE OFFICIALS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. Suzanne Noelle Hueston, Counsel For Jeffery A. Beard, Shirley Moore, John S. Shaffer, Jundith Viglione, Franklin J. … Hendricks, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, Catherine C. McVey, Thomas Costa, Edward Burke; Paule P. Scott, John Does, And Jan Does, Field Agents; Chad L.

Patterson v. Todd & Lemon

18 Pa. 426 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1852

v. … America v. Barriere, 1 Yeates 360 ; Leidy v. Tammany, 9 Watts 353 ; and Jordan v. Hurst, 2 Jones 269 . In Brown v.

Pierce Et Vir v. D. L. W. R. R. Co.

358 Pa. 403 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1948

The evidence is that when she boarded the train at Binghamton she was assisted by the trainman at the car which she boarded and by a soldier. * She did not *Page 406 advise the trainman who put her valise "right at the top … If she required assistance, she should have informed a trainman of the need before reaching her destination: compare Baron v. Wilkes-Barre Co. , 71 Pa. Super. 103 ; Low v. Harrisburg Rwy.

Langley v. Heald

7 Watts & Serg. 96 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1844

The principle is now settled by frequent decisions, and especially in the case of Pells v. Brown, (Cro. Jac. 590), which is considered a leading case on this subject, 3 Yeates 221 , 7 T. … So in a still earlier case, Hynd v. Lyon, (5 Bac.

Com. v. OFFICERS AND EMPL. RETIREMENT BD.

501 Pa. 293 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 1983

Retirement Board, supra; McBride v. Allegheny Co. Retirement Board, supra; Retirement Board of Allegheny Co. v. … A reexamination of the cases of Baker v. Retirement Board of Allegheny County, supra and Hickey v. Pittsburgh Pension Board, supra , is appropriate.

Mulholland's Case

217 Pa. 631 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1907

By certiorari, the board of registration commissioners for the city of Philadelphia have brought the record before us for review. … After considering the prior decisions, Justice Woodward said in Chase v.

Montgomery v. Rowe

239 Pa. 321 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 1913

Justice Brown, When the appellant, a bricklayer in the employ of George Rowe, deceased, went to work on the morning of November 10, 1906, he ascended on an open elevator to the sixth story of a building which his employer … Hughes, 119 Pa. 301 ; Mixter v. Imperial Coal Company, 152 Pa. 395 ; Spees v. Boggs, 198 Pa. 112 ; Surles v. Kistler, 202 Pa. 289 ; Marsh v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, 206 Pa. 558 ; Clark v.