Case law

PSEA v. DCED Cross Appeal of: OOR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 2016

WAYNE DAVENPORT, FREDERICK : SMITH, JAMIE MCPOYLE, BRIANNA : ARGUED: April 5, 2016 MILLER, VALERIE BROWN, JANET : LAYTON, KORRI BROWN, AL REITZ, : LISA LANG, BRAD GROUP AND … The majority dismisses Commonwealth v.

Gard Appeal

356 Pa. 378 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1947

In May of 1945 the mother ashed the Children’s Aid Society to supervise the boarding of the child in a foster home. The respondents W. … See Act of 1785, supra; also, Commonwealth v. Addicks, 2 S. & R. 174; and Commonwealth v.

Sheafer v. Woodside

257 Pa. 276 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1917

Brown, 2 Watts 209 ; Eby v. Eby’s Assignee, 5 Pa. 435 . This presumption does not bar the debt, however. … In Reed v.

Colonial Trust Co. Tr. v. L. D. A. Corp. K. W. Moore

299 Pa. 117 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1929

Consolidated Rubber Co., 284 Pa. 444 ; Schmidt & Friday’s Appeal, 82 Pa. 524 ; Faulkner et al. v. Wilson (Pa.), 3 W. N. C. 339; Brown v. Brown, *123 8 Pa. Dist. R. 365; Washburn v. … And see Horner v. Scott, 242 Pa. 432 ; Coyne et al. v. Souther, 61 Pa. 455 .

Fenn v. Read

1 Yeates 87 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 1791

I was present when the cause of the lessee of Joseph Cook and executors v. George Brown, came on to trial at Carlisle, June assizes 1774, before Chew and Morton, and have taken full notes of the argument. … . & R., 425; Murray v. Murray, 6 Watts, 356 ; Barnett’s Appeal, 3 Rawle, 15 ; Rohrer v. Stayman, 1 Watts, 442 ; and Arndt v. Arndt, x Ser. & R., 256.”

Downingtown Area SD v. Chester Cnty Bd of Assmt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 19, 2026

In Valley Forge Tower Apartments v. … See Clifton v.

In Re Appeal of Borough of Churchill

525 Pa. 80 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 1990

In Quad Associates v. … Tremont Township, 104 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 338, 522 A.2d 102 (1987); Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Willow Grove Veterans Home Association, 97 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 391, 509 A.2d 958 (1986).

Interstate Traveller Services, Inc. v. Commonwealth

486 Pa. 536 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1979

Dunson v. … In Lilian v.

In re Anonymous No. 69 D.B. 89

7 Pa. D. & C.4th 125 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1990

[B] v. [P] (31) On April 22, 1988, respondent initiated an action by writ of summons, [B], Plaintiff v. … (See section 85.8(a)(2), Disciplinary Board Rules).

City of Erie v. Magill

101 Pa. 616 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1882

Co. v. Ogier, 11 Cas. 60; Catawissa R. R. Co. v. Armstrong, 2 P. F. S. 282; Pittsburgh & Connellsville R. R. Co. v. McClurg, 6 P. F. S. 294; McKee v. Bidwell, 24 P. F. S. 218; Goshorn v. Smith, 11 Nor. 435; Baker v. … In Durkin v.

Palmer v. O'Hara

359 Pa. 213 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 1947

Long et al. v. … The jurisdiction is invokable on the complaint of a duly licensed member of the profession unlawfully so invaded: Harris v. State Board of Optometrical Examiners, 287 Pa. 531, 534 , 135 A. 237 .

Kase v. Getchell

21 Pa. 503 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 8, 1853

Tilghman, in Browne v. The Philadelphia Bank, 6 Ser. & R. 484, that such was the customary law before the Act of ’15 was passed. ISTor is there anything in Bennett v. Young, 6 Harris 261, that contravenes the rule.

West Alexander Borough Annexation Case

450 Pa. 453 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1973

Poe-tee [Chairman of the Board of Commissioners]: No, because I got a good picture from Mr. … Unora v.

Steffy v. Reading

353 Pa. 539 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1946

In Lehman v. Hazelton, 135 Pa. … The Court properly gave binding instructions to the jury in favor of defendants and refused plaintiff’s motion for judgment n. o. v.

Langley v. Heald

7 Watts & Serg. 96 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1844

The principle is now settled by frequent decisions, and especially in the case of Pells v. Brown, (Cro. Jac. 590), which is considered a leading case on this subject, 3 Yeates 221 , 7 T. … So in a still earlier case, Hynd v. Lyon, (5 Bac.

Com. v. OFFICERS AND EMPL. RETIREMENT BD.

501 Pa. 293 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 1983

Retirement Board, supra; McBride v. Allegheny Co. Retirement Board, supra; Retirement Board of Allegheny Co. v. … A reexamination of the cases of Baker v. Retirement Board of Allegheny County, supra and Hickey v. Pittsburgh Pension Board, supra , is appropriate.

Pennsylvania State Ed. Assoc., Aplt v. DCED

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 2016

WAYNE DAVENPORT, FREDERICK : SMITH, JAMIE MCPOYLE, BRIANNA : ARGUED: April 5, 2016 MILLER, VALERIE BROWN, JANET : LAYTON, KORRI BROWN, AL REITZ, : LISA LANG, BRAD GROUP AND … The majority dismisses Commonwealth v.

Southeastern Reprographics, Inc. v. Bureau of Professional & Occupational Affairs

169 A.3d 1023 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2016

Patterson v. Todd & Lemon

18 Pa. 426 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1852

v. … America v. Barriere, 1 Yeates 360 ; Leidy v. Tammany, 9 Watts 353 ; and Jordan v. Hurst, 2 Jones 269 . In Brown v.

Commonwealth ex rel. v. Taylor

159 Pa. 451 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1894

Constitutionally therefore it may contain anything that is germane to the subject of that act: Millvale v. R. W. Co., 131 Pa. 1 ; Phila. v. R. W. Co., 142 Pa. 484 . … Smathers v. Taylor, opinion filed herewith, it must fall with the reversal of that judgment. Injunction dissolved and bill dismissed with costs.