Case law

McLean v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.

159 Pa. 112 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1893

John v. Erie Railway Company, 22 Wallace, 136, and New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Nickals, 119 U. S. Rep. 296 . … R. v. Nickals, a somewhat similar state of facts was presented.

Haller Baking Company's Appeal

295 Pa. 257 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1928

The board of adjustment held it must not only have capacity, but when the zoning ordinance became effective be also actually used beyond the capacity of a minor stable, or by five or more horses continuously. … The word “discontinued” here, to have any legal effect, must be the equivalent of “abandonment,” and, in Corr v.

Froess v. Froess

284 Pa. 369 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1925

L. 1003; Leary v. Kelley, 277 Pa. 217 ; Hay’s App., supra), and, on cause shown, as here, the court may direct that this be done: Partnership Act, section 37; Underdown v. Underdown, 270 Pa. 229 . … If no profits are made, or even if a loss is incurred, they must be charged with interest on the funds they use, and the whole loss will be theirs”: Brown’s App., 89 Pa. 139,147 .

Ekel v. Snevily

3 Watts & Serg. 272 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1842

It was said, in Brown v. Sutter, ( 1 Dall. 239 ), that a judgment will not be opened to let in the statute of limitations; but as the plea of that statute has since been considered, in Shock v. … M’Chesney, ( 4 Yeates 507 ), and The Bank v. Israel, ( 6 Serg. & Rawle 294 ), to be no longer i an unconscionable one, the rule of practice would scarce be held so now.

Galette, C. v. NJ Transit; Apl. of: NJT

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 2025

Other courts also invoke the term “alter ego” to mean the same thing (continued…) States Supreme Court’s decision in Franchise Tax Board of California v. … v.

Commonwealth v. Lester

554 Pa. 644 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1998

Commonwealth v. Howard, 538 Pa. 86, 93 , 645 A.2d 1300, 1304 (1994). See also, Commonwealth v. Brown, 544 Pa. 406, 424 , 676 A.2d 1178, 1186 (1996); Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 544 Pa. at 424, 676 A.2d at 1186 . A.

Catawissa Railroad v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.

255 Pa. 269 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1916

Chief Justice Brown, This action, brought on a lease between the appellee and appellant, executed December 7,1896, is for the recovery of income tax paid by the lessor to the United States government. … In North Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Philadelphia and Reading Ry.

Hutchinson v. Boggs & Kirk

28 Pa. 294 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1857

But mere evidence of the want of consideration between the maker and the payee will not be sufficient to put the holder upon the proof of his title to the note: Knight v. Pugh, 4 W. & S. 445 ; Brown v. … . & S. 222 ; Albrecht v. Strimplee, 7 Barr 476; Stitt v. Garrett, 3 Wh. 281 ; Beltzhover v. Blacksloet, 3 Watts 27 ; Snyder v. Riley, 6 Barr 168.

In re Anonymous No. 46 D.B. 73

20 Pa. D. & C.3d 158 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1979

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania: HAMMERMAN, Board Member, Pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 218(c)(5) (Rules), the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (board) herewith … It should be noted that in Rohl v. Texas, p. 29, 1978 * , the attorney was limited to areas of less stressful matters by agreement.

Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Wagner

346 Pa. 566 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 1943

The principle declared and applied in Hotel Casey Co. v. Ross, 343 Pa. 573 , 23 A.2d 737 , controls. The procedural objections urged on behalf of appellants do not merit discussion in this case. … L. 261, section 1, 72 PS Supp. section 503. 2 Rothensies, Collector, v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co., 112 F.2d 758 (C. C. A. 3d, 1940).

Adler v. Montefiore Hospital Ass'n

453 Pa. 60 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1973

See also, Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 33 L. Ed. 2d 548 (1972); Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 1 L. Ed. 2d 796 (1957). … In its recent decision in Board of Regents of State Colleges v.

West Rockhill Twp v. DEP, Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2025

Refractories Co. v. DEP, 2000 EHB 707, 715 (emphasis added). … See id. at 152-56 (relying on Bordentown v.

West Rockhill Twp v. DEP; Apl of: Adelphia Gateway

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2025

Refractories Co. v. DEP, 2000 EHB 707, 715 (emphasis added). … See id. at 152-56 (relying on Bordentown v.

Reed v. Penn Jersey Cert. Con., of: Silvi

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 9, 2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT SHANIKA LAKIYAH BROWN, : No. 87 EM 2018 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT OF : A.B., MINOR : Emergency … : SHAWN OAKMAN : No. 88 EM 2018 : : Emergency Application to Stay v.

Seigle v. Louderbaugh

5 Pa. 490 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1846

The very point has been decided at the present term in Kite v. Brown and Waggoner v. Hastings, (supra, 291, 300.)

Commonwealth v. Weiskerger

520 Pa. 305 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 30, 1989

would give that group control of the nine-member Board of School Directors. … This test was derived from the majority opinions in Sherman v. United States, 356 U.S. 369 , 78 S.Ct. 819 , 2 L.Ed.2d 848 (1958), and Sorrells v.

Pipa v. Kemberling

326 Pa. 498 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1937

See, for example, Commissioners v. Hall, 7 Watts 290 ; McCalmont v. County of Allegheny, 29 Pa. 417 ; Commonwealth v. Darmska, supra, p. 583. … Minerd v.

Estate of Grossman

486 Pa. 460 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1979

Mostoller, 298 Pa. 124 , 148 A. 61 (1929); Sheaffer v. Brown, 281 Pa. 114 , 126 A. 239 (1924); Reap v. Dougher, 261 Pa. 23 , 103 A. 1014 (1918); Burke v. Burke, 240 Pa. 379 , 87 A. 960 (1913); Myers v. … Lebanon v. County Board of Elections, 470 Pa. 317, 322 , 368 A.2d 648, 650 (1977).

Bucher v. Ream

68 Pa. 421 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1871

Smith 437; and property purchased by the wife on the credit of her separate estate or by her earnings, derived from the management of it, is protected from her husband’s creditoi’s: Brown v. Pendleton, 10 P. F. … Raybold, 8 Harris 311; Robinson & Co. v. Wallace, 3 Wright 129 . To enable the wife to maintain her claim to the property in controversy, we should have to reverse the rule laid down in. Hallowell v.

W. Phila A.C.E. Sch. v. S.D. of Phila.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 16, 2016

Tosto v. Pa. Nursing Home Loan Agency, 460 Pa. 1, 12, 331 A.2d 198, 203 (1975). See generally William Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. … State Bd. of Chiropractic Exam’rs v.