Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

0.89s

  • Seigle v. Louderbaugh

    5 Pa. 490 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1846

    The very point has been decided at the present term in Kite v. Brown and Waggoner v. Hastings, (supra, 291, 300.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Meyers v. Central Railroad

    218 Pa. 305 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 20, 1907

    The law governing this feature of the case is summed up by our Brother Brown in Kelly v. Traction Co., 204 Pa. 623 . The judgment is reversed with a procedendo.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Haller Baking Company's Appeal

    295 Pa. 257 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1928

    The board of adjustment held it must not only have capacity, but when the zoning ordinance became effective be also actually used beyond the capacity of a minor stable, or by five or more horses continuously. … The word “discontinued” here, to have any legal effect, must be the equivalent of “abandonment,” and, in Corr v.

    Cited 104 timesPublished
  • APSCUF v. PLRB Appeal of PaSSHE

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2020

    check requirements upon now-statutorily-excluded employees, and that the Board misapplied the balancing-of- interests test promulgated by this Court in Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. … prerogative, including AFSCME, Council 13 v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • MacConnell v. Lindsay

    131 Pa. 476 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 1890

    To the same effect are Wallace v. Coston, 9 W. 137 ; Wright v. Brown, 44 Pa. 224 ; and McMullin v. Beatty, 56 Pa. 389 . … Brown, 44 Pa. 224 , where the whole subject was fully discussed in an opinion by Mr. Justice Strong, and Haines v. Ellis, supra, was expressly and in terms overruled.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. RESTUCCIA

    606 Pa. 511 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 2010

    See Commonwealth v. Brown, 996 A.2d 473 (2010), and this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for REINSTATEMENT of Respondent’s Judgment of Sentence.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education v. Indiana Area School District

    620 Pa. 558 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 2013

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Catawissa Railroad v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.

    255 Pa. 269 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1916

    Chief Justice Brown, This action, brought on a lease between the appellee and appellant, executed December 7,1896, is for the recovery of income tax paid by the lessor to the United States government. … In North Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Philadelphia and Reading Ry.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Thomas

    552 Pa. 621 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 18, 1998

    Commonwealth v. Brown, 551 Pa. 465 , 711 A.2d 444 (1998). Pennsylvania’s murder statute provides, in pertinent part, as follows: § 2502 Murder. … V.

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth Ex Rel. Directors of Poor v. Gibson

    309 Pa. 323 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1932

    Their estimates to the commissioners, apart from fraud, are final and conclusive with the county: Com. ex rel. v. Coyle, 185 Pa. 198 ; Warner v. Poor Directors, 38 Pa. Superior Ct. 437 . … Ridgebury Twp., 303 Pa. 479 ; Georges Twp. v. Union Trust Co., 293 Pa. 364 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pipa v. Kemberling

    326 Pa. 498 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1937

    See, for example, Commissioners v. Hall, 7 Watts 290 ; McCalmont v. County of Allegheny, 29 Pa. 417 ; Commonwealth v. Darmska, supra, p. 583. … Minerd v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. One 1958 Plymouth Sedan

    414 Pa. 540 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1964

    S. v. … S. v.

    Reversed on other grounds by One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania, 380 U.S. 693 (1965)Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth, to Use v. Merchants Nat. Bank

    323 Pa. 145 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1936

    L. 56, 7 PS section 431 et seq.: Thorp v. Wegefarth, 56 Pa. 82 ; Kelsey v. … Bank of Tulsa v. Hoover (Texas) 269 S. W. 262 ; U. S. F. & G. Co. v. Citizens’ Nat. Bank, 13 F. (2d) 213. 10 Cf. American Ry. Express v. Com., 190 Ky. 636 , 228 S. W. 433 ; Jennings Neff & Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Coolspring Stone Supply, Inc. v. County of Fayette

    593 Pa. 338 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 2007

    of Assessment Appeals (“Board”), which upheld the assessment. … See Marshall v. Mellon, 179 Pa. 371 , 36 A. 201 (1897); Blakley v. Marshall, 174 Pa. 425 , 34 A. 564 (1896).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Adler v. Montefiore Hospital Ass'n

    453 Pa. 60 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1973

    See also, Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 33 L. Ed. 2d 548 (1972); Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 1 L. Ed. 2d 796 (1957). … In its recent decision in Board of Regents of State Colleges v.

    Cited 94 timesPublished
  • In re Anonymous No. 46 D.B. 73

    20 Pa. D. & C.3d 158 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1979

    To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania: HAMMERMAN, Board Member, Pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 218(c)(5) (Rules), the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (board) herewith … It should be noted that in Rohl v. Texas, p. 29, 1978 * , the attorney was limited to areas of less stressful matters by agreement.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Galette, C. v. NJ Transit; Apl. of: NJT

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 2025

    Other courts also invoke the term “alter ego” to mean the same thing (continued…) States Supreme Court’s decision in Franchise Tax Board of California v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Penn Jersey Cert. Con., of: Silvi

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 9, 2018

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT SHANIKA LAKIYAH BROWN, : No. 87 EM 2018 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT OF : A.B., MINOR : Emergency … : SHAWN OAKMAN : No. 88 EM 2018 : : Emergency Application to Stay v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Borough v. Consolidated Natural Gas Co.

    219 Pa. 250 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1908

    Co., 148 Pa. 117 , New Hope Borough v. Postal Tel. Cable Co., 202 Pa. 532 , and Taylor Borough v. Postal Tel. Cable Co., 202 Pa. 583 , with which the former is supposed to conflict. The case of Railways Company v. … Justice Brown in the opinion delivered, ££ no matter what the municipal authorities call it, the question is, what is it ?

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Weiskerger

    520 Pa. 305 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 30, 1989

    would give that group control of the nine-member Board of School Directors. … This test was derived from the majority opinions in Sherman v. United States, 356 U.S. 369 , 78 S.Ct. 819 , 2 L.Ed.2d 848 (1958), and Sorrells v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.