Case law

Gima v. Hudson Coal Co.

310 Pa. 480 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1933

The Department of Agriculture (State Live Stock Sanitary Board) has power to adopt and enforce rules for the examination and testing of cattle, and quarantining of diseased cattle: Com. v. Falk, 59 Pa. … L. 468, section 8; Penn Builders v. Blair Co., 302 Pa. 300 ); the State Board of Education may grant or withhold approval of annexation of territory to a city: In re Annexation of Baldwin Twp., 103 Pa.

Rushonosky v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.

293 Pa. 150 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 1928

Claimant appealed to the court below, which sustained the decision of the board and entered judgment for' defendant; this appeal followed. … In Gibb v.

Rynier Estate

347 Pa. 471 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 1943

Huss, 54 Pa. 20 ; Stephens v. Rinehart, 72 Pa. 434 ; Gish v. Brown, 171 Pa. 479, 482 , 33 A. 60 ; Levengood v. … That the latter was not the agent of Buch, and indeed did not know him, is of no legal significance: Blight v. Schenck, 10 Pa. 285, 290 ; Gish v. Brown, 171 Pa. 479, 481 , 33 A. 60 .

Commonwealth v. Futch

492 Pa. 359 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 30, 1981

Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202, 222 , 85 S.Ct. 824, 837 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965). See also Commonwealth v. Brown, 490 Pa. 560 , 417 A.2d 181, 186 (1980); Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, supra and Commonwealth v. Martin, supra; see generally Younger, Unlawful Peremptory Challenges, 7 Litigation: Trial By Jury (ABA), at 23 (Fall 1980).

Palmer Township Annexation Case

416 Pa. 163 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 24, 1964

The board was appointed, held hearings and made a factual report to the court. … Kaufman Construction Company v. Holcomb, 357 Pa. 514 , 55 A. 2d 534 (1947); Chartiers Township Appeal, supra.

Johnson v. Johnson

365 Pa. Super. 409 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1988

Winters, 355 Pa.Super. 64, 69 , 512 A.2d 1211, 1214 (1986); Brown v. Brown, 352 Pa.Super. 267, 270 , 507 A.2d 1223, 1224 (1986); LaBuda v. LaBuda, 349 Pa.Super. 524, 528 , 503 A.2d 971, 974 (1986). … See: Sergi v.

Richter v. Penn Township

9 Pa. 79 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 1848

The executors insisted that their testator’s account could only be examined for tbe last year, and relied on the case of Leasure v. Mahoning Township, 8 Watts, *80 551 . … The act of 1836, being referred to, requires that all orders upon the treasurer of the common-school fund, shall be signed by the president of the board of school directors, and attested by the secretary of the board.

Farmers Dep. N. Bank v. Penn Bank

123 Pa. 283 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1889

This is settled law: Brown v. Clark, 14 Pa. 469 ; Ward v. Tyler, 52 Pa. 393 .

In re Conrad

46 Pa. D. & C.5th 225 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 2015

Inc. v. … V. RECOMMENDATION The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously recommends that petitioner, W. Christopher Conrad, be reinstated to the practice of law.

Scanlon v. Payne

271 Pa. 391 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1921

The compensation board and court below held, following earlier decisions of this court in Di Donato v. Railway, 266 Pa. 412 ; Polk v. Railway, 266 Pa. 335 , and Knorr v. … Since this ease was decided in the court below, the United States Supreme Court has reversed the decisions of this court in Polk v. Phila. & Reading Ry. Co., and Di Donato v.

Thirty-Second Congressional District of Pennsylvania Election Returns

256 Pa. 342 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 1917

in tbe board not to summon the election officers before them with election papers in their possession, nowhere and at no time asked this of tbe board; tbe refusal of their petition did not conclude them from asking sucb … or in tbe open returns, tbe terms for which tbe several candidates for tbe office of school directors were respectively voted for, is to be corrected and supplied by tbe tally list which shows sucb terms”: Com. ex rel. v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. O'Neil

72 Pa. D. & C.4th 438 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 2004

V. RECOMMENDATION The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously recommends that the respondent, Kenton R. O’Neil, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. … Board Member Nordenberg did not participate in the September 27, 2004 adjudication.

In re Anonymous No. 58 D.B. 82

27 Pa. D. & C.3d 471 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 1983

McDONALD, Member, Pursuant to Rule 208(d) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (board) herewith submits its findings and recommendations to your … Accordingly, the recommendation of hearing committee [ ] is accepted and adopted by this *477 board, which recommends the imposition of a three year suspension upon respondent. V.

Parke v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers Mutual Casualty Ins.

334 Pa. 417 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1939

The April following, the widow filed a petition with the Workmen’s Compensation Board, but was met with an adverse ruling in Thompson v. Parke, 131 Pa. … Superior Ct. 81 , on the ground that the parties could not contract themselves into the jurisdiction of the Board.

Bolton v. Hamilton

2 Watts & Serg. 294 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1841

That is over since Brown v. Furer and Gause v. Wiley, (4 Serg. & Rawle). … In Frederick v. Gray, ( 10 Serg. & Rawle 218 ), and in Brown v.

Noecker v. Woods

259 Pa. 160 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1917

In State v. Wetherill, 147 N. W. … Brown v. Heck, 251 Pa. 39 , that the judicial districts of the State cannot be changed by the legislature, session after session, but only at intervals of ten years, as the changes in popula *168 tion. may require.

Pearlman v. Pittsburgh

304 Pa. 24 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1931

See Carroll v. Phila., 183 Pa. 55 . The term ‘lowest bidder’ necessarily implies that there must be a common standard open to all: Page v. King et al., 285 Pa. 153 ; Mazet v. Pittsburgh, 137 Pa. 548 . … Co. v. Allentown, 153 Pa. 319 .

In Re Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights & Adoption of Baby Girl Fleming

471 Pa. 73 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1977

Cooper v. Cooper, 167 Pa.Super. 492 , 75 A.2d 609 (1950); Brown v. Brown, 206 Pa.Super. 439 , 213 A.2d 395 (1965). … Harry v. Eastridge, 374 Pa. 172 , 97 A.2d 350 (1953).” 460 Pa. at 433, 333 A.2d at 851 .

O'Leary v. Wabash, Pittsburg Terminal Railway Co.

210 Pa. 522 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1904

Justice Dean, The appellant attempted in the court below to apply the decision of this court in Dryden v. … The point he endeavors to make is tersely stated by Justice Bbown in the late case of Gaw v. Bristol, etc., R. R.

Beisel v. Gerlach

221 Pa. 232 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 11, 1908

This is substantially the rule' recognized in all jurisdictions: Burnett v. Burkhead, 21 Ark. 77 ; Nevins v. Nevins, 68 Kan. 410 ; Zimmerman v. Whiteley, 134 Mich. 39 ; Payne v. Williams, 63 Tenn. 583 ; Tucker v. … Tucker, 74 Miss. 93 ; Reed v. Reed, 6 Ind. Appeal, 317 ;. Bennett v. Smith, 21 Barb. (N. Y.) 439 ; Young v. Young, 35 Pac. Repr. 592 ; Huling v. Huling, 32 Ill. App. 519 ;. Brown v. Brown, 124 N. C. 19 .