Case law

Adler v. Montefiore Hospital Ass'n

453 Pa. 60 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1973

See also, Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 33 L. Ed. 2d 548 (1972); Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 1 L. Ed. 2d 796 (1957). … In its recent decision in Board of Regents of State Colleges v.

Lapp v. Commonwealth

489 Pa. 532 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 30, 1980

See Lapp v. Commonwealth, 36 Pa.Cmwlth. 142 , 387 A.2d 1312 (1979). … The Commonwealth Court also correctly concluded that the instant case falls within the scope of this Court’s holding in Borg-Warner Corp. v. Board of Finance and Revenue, 424 Pa. 343 , 227 A.2d 153 (1967).

Commonwealth v. Williams

574 Pa. 487 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 2003

State v. … Doe v.

In re Anonymous No. 23 D.B. 87

19 Pa. D. & C.4th 183 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1993

Said charges were filed to U.S. v. … Board Members Hill, Kems and Flaherty did not participate in the adjudication.

In re Anonymous No. 48 D.B. 82

27 Pa. D. & C.3d 115 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1983

McDONALD, Member, Pursuant to Rule 208(d) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (board) herewith submits its findings and recommendations to your … Accordingly, the recommendation of hearing committee that respondent be suspended from active practice for three months and one day is accepted and adopted by this board. V.

Crouse v. Commonwealth

529 Pa. 26 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1992

See, e.g., LeGare v. Unemployment Compensation, Board of Review, 498 Pa. 72 , 444 A.2d 1151 (1982); Commonwealth v. College, 497 Pa. 71 , 439 A.2d 107 (1981); Krawchuk v. … Bailey, 481 So.2d 49 (Fla.App.D1 1985); Polen v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, 466 A.2d 464 (D.C.App.1983); LeStrange v.

Commonwealth v. Morris

320 Pa. Super. 139 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1983

V. … (quoting Neil v.

Discovery Charter School v. School District of Philadelphia

166 A.3d 304 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 8, 2017

Johnson v. Lansdale Borough, 146 A.3d at 711 . … Sch. v.

Meadville Theological School v. Hempstead

290 Pa. 222 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 1927

This, of course, included section 2, Avhich provided that five should constitute a quorum of the board of trustees. … passed pursuant thereto, at least insofar as such regulation did not conflict with any express franchise given by the special incorporating acts, and which remained undisturbed after the amendment was made: Com. ex rel. v.

Rynier Estate

347 Pa. 471 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 1943

Huss, 54 Pa. 20 ; Stephens v. Rinehart, 72 Pa. 434 ; Gish v. Brown, 171 Pa. 479, 482 , 33 A. 60 ; Levengood v. … That the latter was not the agent of Buch, and indeed did not know him, is of no legal significance: Blight v. Schenck, 10 Pa. 285, 290 ; Gish v. Brown, 171 Pa. 479, 481 , 33 A. 60 .

In Re Iulo

564 Pa. 205 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 2001

Upon disclosure of the shortfall to the Disciplinary Review Board of New Jersey respondent was temporarily suspended from the practice of law in 1982. … After review by the entire Board, the Executive Director of the PBLE notified respondent that his application to sit for the examination had been approved under Pa.B.A.R. 203(a)(3).

Commonwealth v. Gambit

501 Pa. 453 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1983

In Terry v. … See Commonwealth v.

Discovery Charter School v. School District of Philadelphia

166 A.3d 304 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 8, 2017

Johnson v. Lansdale Borough, 146 A.3d at 711 . … Sch. v.

In re Anonymous No. 65 D.B. 75

7 Pa. D. & C.3d 519 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 1977

ANDERSON, Board Member, Pursuant to Rule 208(d) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement (rules), the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (board) submits its findings and recommendations to … although “. . . a number of such instances, although unrelated, when considered together, can demonstrate such complete disregard for professional standards that disbarment is necessitated”: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.

Graff v. Williamsport Water Co.

312 Pa. 255 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 1, 1933

Even if there was substance to this contention, which we do not here decide, it is clear that appellant cannot attack such matters at this late date: Com. ex rel. v. Reading Traction Co., 204 Pa. 151 . … See Watts’s App., 78 Pa. 370 ; Kinter v. Commonwealth Trust Co., 274 Pa. 436 ; Dana v. American Tobacco Co., 72 N. J. Eq. 44, affirmed 73 N. J. Eq. 736. The decree of the court below is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

DiPietrae v. City of Philadelphia

673 A.2d 905 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 1996

Dauphin Deposit Trust Co. v. Myers

388 Pa. 444 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 1957

In Evans v. … In Delaware County National Bank v.

Commonwealth v. Claypool

317 Pa. Super. 320 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1984

Commonwealth v. Brown, 462 Pa. 578, 590-91 , 342 A.2d 84, 90 (1975); Commonwealth v. Kjersgaard, 276 Pa.Superior Ct. 368, 375, 419 A.2d 502, 506 (1980) and Commonwealth v. … I have reviewed six cases which specifically address the issue whether “res gestae” or “same transaction” evidence referring to prior criminal conduct is admissible: Brown, supra; Commonwealth v.

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. City of Philadelphia

627 Pa. 470 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2014

Similarly, in County of Venango v. … (citing SEPTA v.

Johnson v. Johnson

365 Pa. Super. 409 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1988

Winters, 355 Pa.Super. 64, 69 , 512 A.2d 1211, 1214 (1986); Brown v. Brown, 352 Pa.Super. 267, 270 , 507 A.2d 1223, 1224 (1986); LaBuda v. LaBuda, 349 Pa.Super. 524, 528 , 503 A.2d 971, 974 (1986). … See: Sergi v.