Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

1.41s

  • Meadville Theological School v. Hempstead

    290 Pa. 222 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 1927

    This, of course, included section 2, Avhich provided that five should constitute a quorum of the board of trustees. … passed pursuant thereto, at least insofar as such regulation did not conflict with any express franchise given by the special incorporating acts, and which remained undisturbed after the amendment was made: Com. ex rel. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brunner

    502 Pa. 358 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 1983

    Washington v. Maroney, 427 Pa. 599 , 235 A.2d 349 (1967), it shall enter an order granting petitioner a new trial. … See Commonwealth v. Vargas, 498 Pa. 121 , 445 A.2d 96 (1982); Commonwealth v. Brown, 478 Pa. 628 , 387 A.2d 665 (1978); Commonwealth v. Moore, 466 Pa. 510 , 353 A.2d 808 (1976); Commonwealth v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rynier Estate

    347 Pa. 471 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 1943

    Huss, 54 Pa. 20 ; Stephens v. Rinehart, 72 Pa. 434 ; Gish v. Brown, 171 Pa. 479, 482 , 33 A. 60 ; Levengood v. … That the latter was not the agent of Buch, and indeed did not know him, is of no legal significance: Blight v. Schenck, 10 Pa. 285, 290 ; Gish v. Brown, 171 Pa. 479, 481 , 33 A. 60 .

    Cited 54 timesPublished
  • In Re Iulo

    564 Pa. 205 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 2001

    Upon disclosure of the shortfall to the Disciplinary Review Board of New Jersey respondent was temporarily suspended from the practice of law in 1982. … After review by the entire Board, the Executive Director of the PBLE notified respondent that his application to sit for the examination had been approved under Pa.B.A.R. 203(a)(3).

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Discovery Charter School v. School District of Philadelphia

    166 A.3d 304 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 8, 2017

    Johnson v. Lansdale Borough, 146 A.3d at 711 . … Sch. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bowfin KeyCon Hldgs. v. DEP, Aplts.

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2023

    : : PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND : PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL : QUALITY BOARD … Bowfin’s failure to file the bond rendered the preliminary injunction a legal nullity and inoperative, Mamula v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Anonymous No. 65 D.B. 75

    7 Pa. D. & C.3d 519 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 1977

    ANDERSON, Board Member, Pursuant to Rule 208(d) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement (rules), the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (board) submits its findings and recommendations to … although “. . . a number of such instances, although unrelated, when considered together, can demonstrate such complete disregard for professional standards that disbarment is necessitated”: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Johnson

    365 Pa. Super. 409 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1988

    Winters, 355 Pa.Super. 64, 69 , 512 A.2d 1211, 1214 (1986); Brown v. Brown, 352 Pa.Super. 267, 270 , 507 A.2d 1223, 1224 (1986); LaBuda v. LaBuda, 349 Pa.Super. 524, 528 , 503 A.2d 971, 974 (1986). … See: Sergi v.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • DiPietrae v. City of Philadelphia

    673 A.2d 905 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 1996

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Griffith v. Eisenberg

    215 Pa. 182 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1906

    This was subsequently overruled by Wright v. Brown, 44 Pa. 224 , but the court below was of opinion that the right of Mrs. … Richardson v. Aiken, 104 Pa. 567 , is conclusive of this.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Plentnick v. Philadelphia & Reading C. & I. Co.

    299 Pa. 493 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 1930

    On a claim filed with the compensation board, the referee entered an award in claimant’s favor. This finding was sustained by the compensation board and the court below. … Dick Co., 288 Pa. 140, 147 ; Slemba v. Hamilton & Son, 290 Pa. 267, 268, 269 . Claimant testified positively he was using a wood tamping stick at the time of the explosion.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ziegler v. Schall

    209 Pa. 526 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1904

    The lien of a judgment obtained during the life of a decedent continues indefinitely as against his heirs and devisees: Konigmaker v. … Brown, 14 Pa. 269 ; Aurand’s Appeal, 34 Pa. 151 ; Bindley’s Appeal, 69 Pa. 295 ; Shearer v. Brinley, 76 Pa. 300 ; Shannon v. Newton, 132 Pa. 375 ; Colenburg v. Venter, 173 Pa. 113 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Dauphin Deposit Trust Co. v. Myers

    388 Pa. 444 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 1957

    In Evans v. … In Delaware County National Bank v.

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • Central Penn National Bank v. Williams

    362 Pa. Super. 229 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 1987

    See also Smith v. Dale, 405 Pa. 293 , 175 A.2d 78 (1961); Hudgins v. Jewel T Discount, supra. … Appellant brings to our attention the case of Brown v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 314 Pa.Super. 78 , 460 A.2d 773 (1983).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Bowfin KeyCon Hldgs. v. DEP

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2023

    : : PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND : PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL : QUALITY BOARD … Bowfin’s failure to file the bond rendered the preliminary injunction a legal nullity and inoperative, Mamula v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Henderson

    242 Pa. 372 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 1913

    Com., 123 Pa. 555 ; Com. v. Roddy, 184 Pa. 274 ; Com. v. Eagan, 190 Pa. 10 ; Com. v. … Reynolds, 171 Mo. 552, 556 ; Asevado v. Orr, 100 Cal. 293, 300 ; 24 Cyc. 251); the thing which the law especially seeks to guard is the right to reject, not to select: Com. v. Brown, 23 Pa.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Ziegler's Appeal

    328 Pa. 280 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1937

    This delayed authorization by the board and appellant’s share in it are the only possible irregularities in the payment; but it was testified without dispute that the frequent practice of the board was to authorize the payment … But that court is restricted to the Code; it must find some violation of the mandatory sections which prescribe the functions and duties of school directors: Davis’s Appeal, 314 Pa. 357 ; White v. Moore, 288 Pa. 411 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Funk

    323 Pa. 390 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1936

    State *396 Board of Public Roads, 47 R. I. 258; People v. Stryker, 206 N. Y. S. 146; People v. Cohen, 217 N. Y. S. 726; Ruggles v. State, 120 Md. 553 ; Watson v. Division of Motor Vehicles, 212 Cal. 279 ; Burgess v. … Thus the legislature has created, inter alia, the Public Service Commission, the Workmen’s Compensation Board, the Board of Moving Picture Censors, and the Liquor Control Board.

    Cited 172 timesPublished
  • Sterling v. Mercantile Mutual Insurance Co. of Philadelphia

    32 Pa. 75 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1858

    In Brown v. Street, 6 W. & S. 221 , it is said that the facts constituting the defence must be stated. So in Moore v. Somerset, Id. 262 . So too the facts must be positively averred to exist, Walker v. … Geisse, 4 Wh. 257 ; Lord v. The Ocean Bank, 8 Harris 386, which is not a characteristic of this affidavit. We think there was no error in entering judgment in this case. Judgment affirmed.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Claypool

    317 Pa. Super. 320 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1984

    Commonwealth v. Brown, 462 Pa. 578, 590-91 , 342 A.2d 84, 90 (1975); Commonwealth v. Kjersgaard, 276 Pa.Superior Ct. 368, 375, 419 A.2d 502, 506 (1980) and Commonwealth v. … I have reviewed six cases which specifically address the issue whether “res gestae” or “same transaction” evidence referring to prior criminal conduct is admissible: Brown, supra; Commonwealth v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.