Case law

ODC v. Michael Howard Marks

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 2015

THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2185 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 80 DB 2015 v … Respondent shall file quarterly written reports with the Secretary of the Board and shall attach reports verifying the above counseling and treatment; and 4.

Wortex Mills, Inc. v. Textile Workers Union of America

369 Pa. 359 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1952

New Hampshire, 306 U.S. 79, 85 ; Maurer v. Hamilton, 309 U.S. 598, 614 ; Watson v. Buck, supra”: Allen-Bradley Local v. Wisconsin E. R. Board, 315 U.S. 740, 749 . … Tennessee Publishing Co. v. American National Bank, 299 U.S. 18 , 22”: Allen-Bradley Local v. Wisconsin E.R. Board, 315 U. S. 740, 746 .

Scherbick v. Community College of Allegheny County

479 Pa. 216 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 1978

The Commonwealth Court, in Ross v. … While we agree that the Commonwealth need not be joined where *220 only tangentially involved, Ross v. Keitt, supra; Comerford v. Factoryville Boro.

Harris v. Philadelphia

283 Pa. 496 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1925

In Zimmerman v. … part of the board to permit an amendment to be made by any of the bidders.

Crane's Appeal

344 Pa. 624 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 12, 1942

For cases holding that the verb “shall” when used in constitutions and statutes leaves nothing to discretion, see Noecker v. Woods, 259 Pa. 160 , 102 A. 507 ; Lynn v. Lynn, 256 Pa. 563, 566 , 100 A. 975 ; Deibert v. … Rhodes, 291 Pa. 550, 554 , 140 A. 515 ; People v. O’Rourke, 121 Cal. App. 752 , 13 P.2d 989 ; Foley v. City of Orange, 91 N. J. L. 551, 103 A. 743 ; Baer v. Gore, 79 W. Va. 50 , 90 S. E. 530 .

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Office of the State Treasurer

543 Pa. 80 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1995

In particular, First Federal argues that as a federally chartered savings and loan association it is subject to the exclusive control of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (Board), in accordance with regulations promulgated … In Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan Association v. de la Cuesta, 458 U.S. 141 , 102 S.Ct. 3014 , 73 L.Ed.2d 664 (1982), the Supreme Court of the United States set forth factors which determine whether state law is preempted

Commonwealth v. Williams

574 Pa. 487 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 2003

State v. … Doe v.

Traylor v. Allentown

378 Pa. 489 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1954

Traylor, deceased, appealed to the court below from the final order of the Board of Revision of Taxes and Appeals for the City of Allentown which had approved the city assessor’s triennial assessment of the decedent’s hotel … In Cumberland Coal Co. v. Board of Revision of Tax Assessments, 284 U. S. 23, 29 , which involved a question of equalizing assessments of lands in Pennsylvania, Mr.

Commonwealth v. Morris

320 Pa. Super. 139 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1983

V. … (quoting Neil v.

King's Application

1 Monag. 145 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1888

Brown, C. W. Stone, H. E. Brown and W. E. Rice, for petitioner. It is not the duty of the court to say whether or not a license to sell intoxicating liquors is necessary. … Frost v. Cherry, 22 W. N. C. 368. Mandamus is the petitioner’s only remedy. Com. v. McLaughlin, 120 Pa. 518; Virginia v. Rives, 100 U. S. 323. Jan. 21, 1888. Per Curiam, Mandamus refused. A. B. W.

Meadville Theological School v. Hempstead

290 Pa. 222 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 1927

This, of course, included section 2, Avhich provided that five should constitute a quorum of the board of trustees. … passed pursuant thereto, at least insofar as such regulation did not conflict with any express franchise given by the special incorporating acts, and which remained undisturbed after the amendment was made: Com. ex rel. v.

Commonwealth v. Brunner

502 Pa. 358 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 1983

Washington v. Maroney, 427 Pa. 599 , 235 A.2d 349 (1967), it shall enter an order granting petitioner a new trial. … See Commonwealth v. Vargas, 498 Pa. 121 , 445 A.2d 96 (1982); Commonwealth v. Brown, 478 Pa. 628 , 387 A.2d 665 (1978); Commonwealth v. Moore, 466 Pa. 510 , 353 A.2d 808 (1976); Commonwealth v.

In Re Iulo

564 Pa. 205 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 2001

Upon disclosure of the shortfall to the Disciplinary Review Board of New Jersey respondent was temporarily suspended from the practice of law in 1982. … After review by the entire Board, the Executive Director of the PBLE notified respondent that his application to sit for the examination had been approved under Pa.B.A.R. 203(a)(3).

Bowfin KeyCon Hldgs. v. DEP, Aplts.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2023

: : PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND : PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL : QUALITY BOARD … Bowfin’s failure to file the bond rendered the preliminary injunction a legal nullity and inoperative, Mamula v.

In re Anonymous No. 65 D.B. 75

7 Pa. D. & C.3d 519 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 1977

ANDERSON, Board Member, Pursuant to Rule 208(d) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement (rules), the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (board) submits its findings and recommendations to … although “. . . a number of such instances, although unrelated, when considered together, can demonstrate such complete disregard for professional standards that disbarment is necessitated”: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.

In re Anonymous Nos. 40 D.B. 00 & 80 D.B. 00

57 Pa. D. & C.4th 567 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2001

This matter was adjudicated by the Disciplinary Board at the meeting of May 23, 2001. II. … V.

DiPietrae v. City of Philadelphia

673 A.2d 905 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 1996

Houlehan v. Pullman Co.

280 Pa. 402 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 12, 1924

The referee and compensation board found he was and allowed compensation; this the court of common pleas reversed and remanded the case for further hearing. … In Haddock v. Edgewater Steel Co. et al., 263 Pa. 120 , also in Messer v. Manufacturers’ L. & H.

Griffith v. Eisenberg

215 Pa. 182 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1906

This was subsequently overruled by Wright v. Brown, 44 Pa. 224 , but the court below was of opinion that the right of Mrs. … Richardson v. Aiken, 104 Pa. 567 , is conclusive of this.

Ziegler v. Schall

209 Pa. 526 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1904

The lien of a judgment obtained during the life of a decedent continues indefinitely as against his heirs and devisees: Konigmaker v. … Brown, 14 Pa. 269 ; Aurand’s Appeal, 34 Pa. 151 ; Bindley’s Appeal, 69 Pa. 295 ; Shearer v. Brinley, 76 Pa. 300 ; Shannon v. Newton, 132 Pa. 375 ; Colenburg v. Venter, 173 Pa. 113 .