Case law

Elkins & Co. v. Suplee

371 Pa. Super. 570 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1988

Goodwin v. Elkins & Co., 730 F.2d 99 (3d Cir.1984). … Waddell v. Shriber, 465 Pa. 20 , 348 A.2d 96 (1975).

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Foreman v. Hampson

393 Pa. 467 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1958

In Lennox v. … In Richie v.

Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Bond A.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 2018

Should a [Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 167 A.3d 703 (Pa. 2017).

In re Anonymous No. 38 D.B. 80

22 Pa. D. & C.3d 439 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1982

V. … Accordingly the board finds that respondent violated said Disciplinary Rules as indicated in its conclusions of law above.

Hall v. Reeb

382 Pa. Super. 452 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1989

McGowan quashing their appeal from the award entered in favor of the Defendant-Appellees by a board of arbitrators. For the reasons which follow, we reverse the order. … Pullium, v. Laurel School District, 316 Pa.Super. 339 , 462 A.2d 1380 (1983).

Wilhelm's Case

269 Pa. 416 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 1921

In 1909 he became counsel for plaintiff in the personal injury case of William Snyder, guardian of Mary Rymovich v. … in open court for statements made by him before the board of censors, reflecting upon the late Hon.

Pennsylvania R. R. v. Cameron

280 Pa. 458 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1924

Co. v. Baer, 56 Pa. Superior Ct. 807 ; West Jersey & Seashore R. R. Co. v. Whiting L. Co., 71 Pa. … We stated in Foye v.

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pittsburg

221 Pa. 90 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1908

Railroad Company v. … L. 126, is still in force: Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Fricke, 152 Pa. 231 .

Reynolds v. Cridge

131 Pa. 189 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1890

Nor is the lapse of time *195 a bar to the plaintiffs, in the absence of circumstances of equitable estoppel, such as existed in Waterman v. Brown, 31 Pa. 163 , and the cases cited from 55 Ill. 468 , Adams v. … S. 611 , Hayward v. National Bank. The other assignments do not seem to require particular notice. Judgment reversed, and venire de novo awarded.

Messina v. East Penn Township

619 Pa. 326 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2012

In Luke v. … See Le-high Asphalt Paving & Construction Company v. Board of Supervisors of East Penn Township, 830 A.2d 1063 (Pa. Cmwlth.2003).

Township of Chartiers v. William H. Martin, Inc.

518 Pa. 181 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 20, 1988

See Silver v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 435 Pa. 99 , 255 A.2d 506 (1969); Jackson v. Pottstown Zoning Board of Adjustment, 426 Pa. 534 , 233 A.2d 252 (1967). Later, in Cheswick Borough v. … See, e.g., Township of Kelly v. Zoning Hearing Board, 36 Pa. Cmwlth. 509, 388 A.2d 347 (1978); Casilio and Sons v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Township of Stroud, 26 Pa. Cmwlth. 608, 364 A.2d 969 (1976).

Rose Tree Media School District v. Department of Public Instruction

431 Pa. 233 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 13, 1968

Volunteer Firemen’s Relief Association v. Minehart, 415 Pa. 305 , 203 *236 A. 2d 476 (1964); Meadville Area School District v. Department of Public Instruction, 398 Pa. 496 , 159 A. 2d 482 (1960); Mellinger v. … Kuhn, 388 Pa. 83 , 130 A. 2d 154 (1957); Maxwell v. Farrell School District Board of Directors, 381 Pa. 561 , 112 A. 2d 192 (1955); Dechert, Controller of the City and County of Philadelphia v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Simon

510 Pa. 312 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1986

See, e.g., Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lewis, 493 Pa. 519 , 426 A.2d 1138 (1981). . Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Sup. Ct. v. … Nebraska State Bar Ass’n v.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Chidsey v. Mallen

360 Pa. 606 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1948

Election Board v. Rader et al., 162 Pa. Superior Ct. 499 , 58 A. 2d 187 (1948). … Election Board v. Rader, 162 Pa.

Haven v. Pittsburgh & Allegheny Bridge Co.

151 Pa. 620 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 11, 1892

Thus in Forks Township v. … In Hill v.

Commonwealth v. Jackson

509 Pa. 601 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1986

See Commonwealth v. … In Commonwealth v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Frank

22 Pa. D. & C.5th 511 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 2011

BAER, Member, The three-member Panel of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, consisting of board members Mark S. Baer, Sal Cognetti, Jr., and Charlotte S. … See, Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Harry Curtis Forrest, Jr., No. 134 DB 2003, D.Bd.

In re Anonymous

22 Pa. D. & C.4th 465 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 1993

After adjudication by the board on February 25, 1993, the board makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. *468 II. … V. DISPOSITION The Disciplinary Board directs that respondent receive an informal admonition. Costs are to be paid by the respondent.

Central Penn National Bank v. Williams

362 Pa. Super. 229 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 1987

See also Smith v. Dale, 405 Pa. 293 , 175 A.2d 78 (1961); Hudgins v. Jewel T Discount, supra. … Appellant brings to our attention the case of Brown v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 314 Pa.Super. 78 , 460 A.2d 773 (1983).

DiMarco v. Lynch Homes-Chester County, Inc.

525 Pa. 558 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1990

In Cantwell v. … In Guy v.