Case law

Commonwealth v. Thacker

328 Pa. 402 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1937

Brown, 309 Pa. 515 . However, as we said in Com. v. … Nor do we share the view that the portions complained of are within the rulings in Com. v. Polichinus, supra; Com. v. Brown, supra, and Com. v. Wood, 118 Pa. Super. Ct. 269 , as defendant earnestly contends.

Hauser v. York Water Co.

278 Pa. 387 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1924

As the list of stockholders was sought for a proper purpose, it was not necessary to aver mismanagement, or to state why plaintiffs desired a new board of directors. … L. 326; Scott v. Pittsburgh, supra; Roush v. Herbick, supra.

Commonwealth v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.

207 Pa. 160 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1903

Justice Brown, This case was argued with Commonwealth v. Buffalo & Susquehanna Railroad Company, No. 7, May Term, 1903, and, for the reasons given in the opinion filed in that case, the judgment must be affirmed.

Pierce v. Cloud

42 Pa. 102 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 17, 1862

The law of private ways was well expounded in Garret v. Jackson, 8 Harris 335. Under the English statute of 2 & 3 Wm. 4, c. 71, enjoyment of a way, as of right, was defined by Lord Denman, in Tickle v. … Brown, 4 A. & E. 369, to mean an .enjoyment had, not secretly or by stealth, or by tacit sufferance, or by permission asked from time to time, on each occasion, or even on many occasions of using it; but an enjoyment had

Kline Township School Directors' Case

353 Pa. 91 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1945

L. 684, it is provided that the board of school directors of each district may appoint from among their number one delegate to any convention of school directors and may also appoint the secretary of the board as a delegate … President Judge Palmee in his dissenting opinion held that if the charges made against these respondents are true they committed the crime of extortion at common law, citing Commonwealth v. Channing, 55 Pa.

Byrne v. Henry A. Hitner's Sons Co.

290 Pa. 225 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1927

The referee, the board and the court below held that deceased was a loaned or hired employee of the Hitner Co., the subcontractor under the principle of law announced in Tarr v. … In Gallivan v.

ODC v. Neissh, L.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 2014

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2074 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 31 DB 2013 v … Upon completion of the period of probation, respondent shall submit a sworn certification to the Board that he has complied with the above condition.

Eby v. Eby's Assignee

5 Pa. 435 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 1846

Brown, 2 Watts, 214 ; Levers v. Van Buskirk, 7 Watts & Serg. 70 . The witness, it is true, did not recollect the precise words used by either party after the lapse of seven or eight years. … The cases already cited, of McDowell v. McCullough and Foulk v. Brown, sufficiently indicate the law on this point.

Consumers Education & Protective Ass'n v. Nolan

470 Pa. 372 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1977

In Eastland v. … Commonwealth, or any State, municipal, township or school authority, school board, school governing body, commission, the board of trustees of all State-aided colleges and universities, the board of trustees of all State-owned

In re Anonymous Nos. 40 D.B. 00 & 80 D.B. 00

57 Pa. D. & C.4th 567 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2001

This matter was adjudicated by the Disciplinary Board at the meeting of May 23, 2001. II. … V.

Adams v. Robinson

6 Pa. 271 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 1847

Eer Curiam: This case is not distinguishable in principle from Waggoner v. Hastings, and Kite v. Brown, decided at the last term at Harrisburg. … In Johnson v. Irwin, 3 Serg. & Rawle, 291 , and Royer v. Benlow, 10 Serg. & Rawle, 306 , actual possession is said to arise from cultivation or enclosure and in Sorber v. Willing, 10 Watts, 141 , and Wright v.

Sanders Estate

370 Pa. 208 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1952

Young, appellant, presented an itemized claim against the estate of Andrew Smiley Sanders, the decedent, for room, board, laundry, nursing and other personal service. … s estate, which might have been made against him while living, are subjects of just suspicion and strict proof is required: Gross’s Estate, 284 Pa. 73 , 130 A. 304 ; Schwoyer’s Estate, 288 Pa. 541 , 136 A. 798 ; Bangert v.

Illig v. Chartiers Southern Railway Co.

268 Pa. 467 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1920

This appropriation was originally made in pursuance of a resolution of the company’s board of directors passed in the City of Pittsburgh. … Corporations, 2d ed., vol. 2, sec. 1136; vide, also, Williams v.

Piskanin, M., Aplt. v. Wetzel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 2014

PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Ex Rel:: No. 47 MAP 2013 Michael John Piskanin, Jr., : Appellant : v … : John Wetzel as secretary Pennsylvania : Department of Corrections; and : Pennsylvania Department of Corrections; : and Secretary and Board of Pennsylvania : Board of Probation and Parole

Commonwealth v. Vargas

498 Pa. 121 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1982

Washington v. Maroney, 427 Pa. 599 , 235 A.2d 349 (1967), an order shall be entered granting appellant a new trial. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 478 Pa. 628 , 387 A.2d 665 (1978); Commonwealth v. Moore, 466 Pa. 510 , 353 A.2d 808 (1976); Commonwealth v. Twiggs, 460 Pa. 105 , 331 A.2d 440 (1975).

General Motors, LLC v. St Brd/Vehicle Manufacturer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 2019

Ass’n v. Pa. … Indeed, the Commonwealth Court’s “focus must center on the Board’s interpretation of the Act and its application to Petitioner; the Board’s decision cannot be overturned unless clearly erroneous.” Maggio v.

Bitting v. Commonwealth ex rel. Snyder

7 Sadler 545 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 1887

.” *547 We have fully considered that question in the case of Evans v. Phillipi, 117 Pa. 226 , 2 Am. St.

In Re: ZHB of Cheltenham Twp 12-16-15 Decision

211 A.3d 845 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 2019

... the zoning hearing board .... … Doe v. Franklin Cnty. , 644 Pa. 1 , 174 A.3d 593 , 605 (2017).

Dowling v. Merchants Insurance

168 Pa. 234 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 20, 1895

Co. v. Cusick, 109 Pa. 157 ; Kister v. Lebanon Mutual Ins. Co., 128 Pa. 553 ; Meyers v. Ins. Co., 156 Pa. 420 . This case is much stronger for the plaintiff than those above cited. … The building insured was built for and used as a boarding house, and was erroneously described in the policy as “occupied by the insured as a dwelling only.”

Schulz Naturalization Case

384 Pa. 558 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1956

In 1944, appellant’s case was reviewed by the Selective Service Board. It was reported by the Board’s interviewer that appellant was unwilling to enter the United States Army. … All [Federal and State courts] are, for the purposes of the naturalization acts, federal courts, . . . one set of courts is not foreign to the other. . .”.: United States v. Aaker *562 vik, 180 Fed. 137, 141 .