Case law

Post v. Mendel

510 Pa. 213 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 1986

In Kemper v. … In The King v.

Syme v. Bankers National Life Insurance

400 Pa. 74 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 1960

Brown, 327 Pa. 61 , 192 A. 876 , Zinsser v. Zinsser, 83 Pa. Superior Ct. 461 . In Ruzyc v. … Brown, the Court said: “The argument that plaintiffs’ attorneys have an interest in the judgment to the extent of their fee is without merit.

Masloff v. Port Auth. of Allegheny Cty.

531 Pa. 416 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 1992

Duff v. Keenan, 347 Pa. 574 , 33 A.2d 244 (1943). Article 1, Section 11 can be invoked only with respect to a legal injury. Jackman v. … In Armstrong Education Association v.

Miller Estate

380 Pa. 172 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1955

Miller (Items Seven and Eight supra) were incorporated by reference in the will of George Barron Miller (see Clark v. … In the case of The City of Philadelphia, v.

Lindsley v. Malone

23 Pa. 24 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1854

Quigley, 1 Binney 222; Brown v. Ridgway, 10 Barr 42. … Under the principle which was first enunciated in Post v. Avery, 5 W. & Ser. 609, and afterwards followed by Lieper v. Pierce, Patterson v. Reed, Phinney v.

Standiford v. Kloman

234 Pa. 443 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 1912

minority of said board of directors.” … An interesting case as defining the duties of the court in such cases, and very apposite here, is Johnston v. Gray, 16, S. & R. 361.

Barber v. Wm. H. Horstman Co.

295 Pa. 253 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1929

Corporations, vol. 1, p. 644, section 805; Brindley v. Walker, 221 Pa. 287, 292-3 ; Spahn v. Bielefeld & Spahn Co., 256 Pa. 543, 547 . … True, in Spahn v.

Zavodnick v. Rose Son

297 Pa. 86 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1929

We have uniformly held that unnecessarily standing on the running board of an electric car or on its platform or on that of a steam railway car was contributory negligence. Speaking for the court, in Thane v. … While in Schomaker v.

Duncan v. Alt

3 Pen. & W. 382 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1832

“It is said there are cases,” he remarked, “wherein the court has gone a great way, to level legatees, and make them abate in proportion, as in Brown v. Mien. … Lewin v. Lewin, 2 Ves. 415. The case of Brown v.

Fountain Hill Underwear Mills v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers' Union of America

393 Pa. 385 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1958

In Wortex Mills, Inc. v. … However, even if we assume that the National Labor Relations Board does have jurisdiction over the controversy in question, this does not per se deny state action in all cases. In Wilkes Sportswear, Inc. v.

In the Matter of: Michael Andrew Rabel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 2016

C4-13-299, : C4-13-447, C4-13-850, C4-13-885, C4-14- v. … It is further ordered that Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

In re Anonymous No. 60 D.B. 83

39 Pa. D. & C.3d 175 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 1986

MCDONALD, Member, Pursuant to Rule 218(c)(5) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (board) submits its findings and recommendations to your honorable … V. RECOMMENDATIONS The Disciplinary Board recommend^ to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania as follows: 1. That petitioner, [ ], be readmitted to the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 2.

Commonwealth v. After Six, Inc.

489 Pa. 69 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1980

Commonwealth v. … Determinations of the Board of Finance and Revenue. “(i) Exceptions.

Commonwealth v. Funk

323 Pa. 390 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1936

State *396 Board of Public Roads, 47 R. I. 258; People v. Stryker, 206 N. Y. S. 146; People v. Cohen, 217 N. Y. S. 726; Ruggles v. State, 120 Md. 553 ; Watson v. Division of Motor Vehicles, 212 Cal. 279 ; Burgess v. … Thus the legislature has created, inter alia, the Public Service Commission, the Workmen’s Compensation Board, the Board of Moving Picture Censors, and the Liquor Control Board.

Pennsylvania State Police v. Hospitality Investments of Philadelphia, Inc.

547 Pa. 142 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1997

(Hospitality), is the holder of a restaurant liquor license issued by the Pennsylvania Liquor *144 Control Board (Board), and is a retailer licensee. … Commonwealth v. Edmunds, 526 Pa. 374 , 586 A.2d 887 (1991).

McGinley v. Milk & Ice Cream Salesmen

351 Pa. 47 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1944

We said, in Quinn Coal Co. v. Scranton A. C. … Nothing but clear error would warrant such action on our part, and it does not appear here: Cruzan v. Cruzan, 243 Pa. 165 , 89 A. 876 ; Heffernan v. Heffernan, 344 Pa. 137 , 23 A. 2d 424 .” Decrees affirmed.

Miron, T., Aplt. v. Delaware Cty. Tax Claim Bur

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2025

of Missions v. … v. Lancaster County Tax Claim Bureau, 470 A.2d 938 (Pa. 1983)?1 Having read the parties’ briefs and heard their arguments, I join the decision to dismiss this appeal as improvidently granted.

Sevast v. Kakouras

580 Pa. 352 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 2004

Whether the Superior Court departed from its own precedent in Brown v.

Kennedy v. Pittsburgh

230 Pa. 244 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1911

Justice Brown, If the plaintiff succeeded in showing that the defendant was guilty of negligence, she at the same time most clearly established her own as a contributing cause of the injuries she sustained. … Under Shall-cross v. Phila., 187 Pa. 143 ; Kennedy v. Phila., 220 Pa. 273 , and kindred cases, defendant’s point should have been affirmed.

ODC v. Jeff Foreman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 2014

THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 1543 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 164 DB 2009 v … It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa. R.D.E.