Case law

ODC, Pet v. Robert M. Danenberg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 2014

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 1632 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 130 DB 2010 v … It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Susquehanna Rheems Holdings, LLC v. W. Donegal Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.

207 A.3d 906 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2019

Schena v. Smiley

488 Pa. 632 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1980

Trades Council v. … Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Carpenters, 436 U.S. 180 , 98 S.Ct. 1745 , 56 L.Ed.2d 209 (1978); Farmer v. Carpenters, 430 U.S. 290 , 97 S.Ct. 1056 , 51 L.Ed.2d 338 (1977); Linn v.

Garsteck v. United States Steel Corp.

507 Pa. 163 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1985

Allegheny Light Co. v. Pittsburgh

211 Pa. 489 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1905

Justice Brown, The tax which the city of Pittsburg would collect from this *490 appellee is an unauthorized property tax, and, for tlie reason given in the opinion in Pittsburgh Railways Company v.

Hamberg v. Barsky

355 Pa. 462 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1946

Decree affirmed; costs to be paid by defendants. * Examples: Stewart v. Brown, 2 S. & R. 461; Brown v. Dysinger, 1 Rawle 408, 413, 414 ; Kisler v. Kisler, 2 Watts 323, 325 ; M’Culloch v. … . & S. 427, 430 ; Morey v. Herrick, 18 Pa. 123, 128, 129 ; Seichrist’s Appeal, 66 Pa. 237 ; Squire’s Appeal, 70 Pa. 266 ; Boynton v. Housler, 73 Pa. 453 ; Schrager v. Cool, 221 Pa. 622 , 70 A. 889 ; Kern v.

Mankewicz v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

214 Pa. 386 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1906

In the recent case of Kinter v. Penna. … Railroad Co., 204 Pa. 497 , the authorities on the subject were reviewed by Justice Brown, and it was shown that the principle has been uniformly recognized in the cases following Penna. Railroad Co. v.

Commonwealth v. Crucible Steel Co. of America

207 Pa. 308 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1904

Justice Brown, This case was argued with Commonwealth v, Danville Bess *309 emer Company, May term, 1903, No. 8, and, in view of wliat we have said in the opinion in that case, this day filed, the judgment is affirmed.

ODC, Pet v. William Nivan Renwick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 14, 2015

THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2146 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 153 DB 2013 v … It is further ORDERED that Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Buehler v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co.

280 Pa. 92 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1924

See Morrett v. Fire Association of Philadelphia, 265 Pa. 9, 13, 14 . … The papers were properly certified from the board, and that is all the act requires when matters from that bureau are to be proved.

Hudson Coal Company's Appeal

327 Pa. 247 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 1937

All owners and operators of coal lands in Lackawanna County severally appealed from the action of the Board of Assessment to the Court of Common Pleas. … However, it has been approved in special cases: see Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co.’s Assessment, 298 Pa. supra; Lehigh Valley Coal Company v. Luzerne Co., 255 Pa. 17 .

F. F. Bollinger Co. v. Widmann Brewing Corp.

339 Pa. 289 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 1940

passage of the Act who have submitted evidence to the board of their qualifications. … See Johnson v. Rulings, 103 Pa. 498 ; Verona v. Schenley Farms Co., 312 Pa. 57, 65-66 ; Sherman v. Welsh, 87 Pa. Superior Ct. 282 . In Luce v.

Jenkins v. Baxter

160 Pa. 199 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1894

Those who remained elected a board of directors, who afterward elected the defendants officers of the company. … N. 85, and to Tunis v. The Hestonville Pass., Ry. Co., 149 Pa. 70 .

Gandy v. Pinkerton

220 Pa. 293 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 1908

Justice Brown, The question involved in this appeal is the same as that raised and disposed of in Gandy v. Weckerly, ante, p. 285, in which we have this day filed an opinion.

Bowfin KeyCon Hldgs. v. DEP

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2023

: : : PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND : PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL : QUALITY BOARD … See Mamula v.

ODC v. Samuel Foley, Jr.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 14, 2014

THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 1801 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 201 DB 2011 v … It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa. R.D.E.

Collins v. Lewis

276 Pa. 435 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 1923

It appears, from the answer, that defendant association is conducting its institution “as a purely non-sectarian hospital; that the majority of the board of incorporators, board of trustees, officials, surgical and medical … While, as we said in Collins v.

Strausz v. McKeesport

316 Pa. 277 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1934

Justice Schaffer, This is an appeal from the award of a board of viewers assessing damages for change of grade of the street in front of plaintiffs’ property. … In Frick v. Phila., 60 Pa.

Werner v. King

310 Pa. 120 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1932

L. 349), “to define the powers and duties of the department of revenue, the treasury department, the department of the auditor general, the secretary of the Commonwealth, the board of finance and revenue, the. board of fish … Phillips, 241 Pa. 246, 249 ; Murdoch v. Biery, 269 Pa. 577, 580 ; Reeves’s App., 33 Pa. Superior Ct. 196, 201 )......;” Com. v. Curry, 285 Pa. 289, 291 .

Di Giuseppe v. Hrivnak

359 Pa. 408 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1948

The minor, aged ten years and ten months, was standing on the running board of Hrivnak’s motor truck and was injured when the truck and Vaulko’s sedan collided. On the authority of D’Ambrosio v. … That standard was the care owing by a driver to his guest passenger: Ferrell v. Solski, 278 Pa. 565, 567 , 123 A. 493 ; Filer v. Filer, 301 Pa. 461 , 152 A. 567 ; Lazor v. Banas, 114 Pa.