Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

1.47s

  • Philadelphia v. Fox

    64 Pa. 169 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 1870

    Bailey, 2 Denio 433 ; Prather v. City, 13 B. Monroe 559 ; Alcorn v. The City, 8 Wright 348 . … Montpelier v. East Montpelier, 29 Term. 21.

    Cited 93 timesPublished
  • Cherry v. City of Philadelphia

    547 Pa. 679 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1997

    . § 7541(c); 6 Penn Galvanizing Co. v. … In Lynch v. Owen J.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Gas & Water Co. v. Borough of Downingtown

    193 Pa. 255 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1899

    In Mauch Chunk v. McGee, 81 Pa. 433 , Agnew, C. … In Commonwealth v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Smolow v. Hafer

    598 Pa. 561 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 2008

    v. … Simon v. Wiessman, 2007 WL 2461707 , *5-7 (E.D.Pa., Aug.27, 2007) (discussing Smyth v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Poulos v. Commonwealth

    438 Pa. 442 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1970

    A board of viewers awarded damages for the taking of $31,300, plus $4,466 in detention damages. … v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Metal Green v. Phila, of: Metal Green

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 2021

    : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from v. … evidence analysis based on an erroneous standard of “possibility” for the minimum variance that will afford relief test thereby refusing to apply a capricious disregard of evidence analysis where the Zoning Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Anonymous No. 26 D.B. 90

    23 Pa. D. & C.4th 187 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1994

    The Disciplinary Board found that petitioner violated D.R. 1402(A)(5); D.R. 7406(A); D.R. 1402(A)(6); and D.R. 6-102(A). … V. RECOMMENDATION The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously recommends that petitioner, [ ], be reinstated to the practice of law.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Anonymous No. 46 D.B. 93

    60 Pa. D. & C.4th 572 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2001

    This matter was adjudicated by the Disciplinary Board at the meeting of August 2, 2000. II. … For the reasons set forth above, the board recommends that the petition for reinstatement be granted. V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McNeil-PPC, Inc. v. Commonwealth

    575 Pa. 50 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 2003

    PPG Industries v. Commonwealth, Board of Finance and Revenue, 567 Pa. 580 , 790 A.2d 261, 266 (2001). … In Commonwealth v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • ODC v. Randal E. McCarney

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2016

    OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2050 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : : No. 43 DB 2014 v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g). Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dubose, R. v. Willowcrest Nur. Home, Aplts.

    173 A.3d 634 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 2017

    The jury apportioned liability as 60% to Willowcrest, 25% to Einstein Healthcare Network, and 15% to Donna Brown. … C.J.S. § 7, at 24; see also School Board of Norfolk v.

    Cited 76 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Cook

    289 Pa. 207 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1927

    The mere authority to collect interest does not give the right to accept principal in satisfaction of the outstanding claim: Browne v. Hoekstra, 279 Pa. 418 ; Mynick v. Bickings, 30 Pa. Superior Ct. 401 . … Many cases will be found in this state where this rule has been enforced: Miller v. Preston, 154 Pa. 63 ; Himes v. Herr, 3 Pa. Superior Ct. 124 ; Kissick v. Hunter, supra; Browne v. Hoekstra, supra.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • ODC v. Donald B. Corriere

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 2015

    SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2172 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 182 DB 2014 v … Respondent shall pay costs incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the investigation and prosecution of this matter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Guinn v. Alburtis Fire Co.

    531 Pa. 500 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1992

    See also Rivenbark v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 509 Pa. 248, 255 , 501 A.2d 1110, 1114 (1985). The language of Section 8541 is clear and unambiguous. … Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education, 453 Pa. 584, 592 , 305 A.2d 877, 881 (1973).

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Third National Bank v. Kerkeslager

    227 Pa. 542 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 1910

    Justice Brown, March 28, 1910: The question involved on this appeal has been disposed of in the opinion filed in No. 334 to the present term, Wood v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Shaw

    476 Pa. 543 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 1978

    Brown v. Illinois, supra; Wong Sun v. United States, supra; Commonwealth v. Farley, supra. … See Brown v. Illinois, supra; Wong Sun v. United States, supra; Commonwealth v. Farley, supra.

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • Standard Soap & Oil Co. v. Printz Degreasing Co.

    232 Pa. 64 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 1911

    Justice Brown, The main prayer of the bill filed by the appellant in the court below was for the specific performance of a contract with the appellee. … As a rule, when they are unduly numerous, they are “suggestive of firing at random in the bushes in the hope that a stray shot may produce a favorable result:” Clay v. Western Maryland R. R. Co., 221 Pa. 439 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Wall

    372 Pa. Super. 534 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1988

    Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 476 U.S. *541 747, 759, 106 S.Ct. 2169, 2178 , 90 L.Ed.2d 779, 792-93 (1986) (quoting Brown v. … Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 300 , 75 S.Ct. 753, 756 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955)). 4 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Osika v. Hudson Coal Co.

    274 Pa. 367 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1922

    In reviewing the case it is our duty to consider whether there is evidence to support the findings of the board and the court below and, if so, whether the law has been properly applied: Kuca v. … Lehigh Valley Coal Co., 268 Pa. 163 ; Strohl v. Eastern Penna. Ry. Co., 270 Pa. 132 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Leidy v. Tammany

    9 Watts 353 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1840

    Grant v. Vaughan, 3 Burr. 1520; Brown v. Harraden, 4 Term Rep. 151. … Brown v. Harradon, 4 Term Rep. cites for this, Buller v. Cripps, 6 Mod. 29, 30. See also Crenshaw v. M’Kiernan, 1 Minor's Alabama Rep. 392; Ald\is v. Johnson, 1 Verm. Rep. 136 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.