Case law

In re Anonymous No. 42 D.B. 84

35 Pa. D. & C.3d 34 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 1985

of Disciplinary Enforcement 208(d), the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (board) submits its findings and recommendations to your honorable court with respect to the above-captioned petition for discipline … V.

Real Estate Investment Co. v. Russel

148 Pa. 496 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1892

It is equally well settled, however, that, when the defendant has shown that the note tvas obtained, or put into circulation, by fraud or undue means, the maker may require proof of consideration: Phelan v. … Moss, 67 Pa. 59 ; Knight v. Pugh, 4 W. & S. 445 ; Brown v. Street, 6 Id. 221; Hutchinson v. Boggs, 28 Pa. 294 ; Gray’s Administrators v. Bank of Kentucky, 29 Id. 365 .

Real Estate Land Title & Trust Co. v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ins.

295 Pa. 90 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 1928

Under such circumstances, we will not pass upon the question of law until an opportunity is had fully to develop the facts in the court below: Brown v. Unger, 269 Pa. 471, 472 . … In cases “requiring broad inquiry into facts, where the court refuses judgment, the matter in controversy should go to the jury......to decide the cause, under proper instructions from the court”: Federal Sales Co. v.

BILLOW v. Farmers Trust Co.

438 Pa. 514 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1970

Leasure v. Heller, 436 Pa. 108 , 258 A. 2d 855 (1969); Giragosian v. Philadelphia, 394 Pa. 476 , 147 A. 2d 309 (1959); Helfrich v. Brown, 213 Pa. Superior Ct. 463 , 249 A. 2d 778 (1968). … This statement fails to meet the standards we recently set forth in Morreale v.

In re Anonymous No. 18 D.B. 78

14 Pa. D. & C.3d 759 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1980

In Maryland State Bar Association, Inc. v. … . & C. 3d 685 (1977), and Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Troback, 477 Pa. 318 , 383 A. 2d 952 (1978).

ODC, Pet v. Edwin L. London

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 2015

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2201 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : Nos. 119 & 171 DB 2014 v … Respondent’s Petition for Waiver of Costs in Disciplinary Action in Accordance with Pa.R.D.E. 208(g) is denied, and he shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

ODC v. Michael J. Casale, Jr.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 2018

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2435 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 204 DB 2017 : v … It is further ordered that Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay the costs incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the investigation and prosecution of this matter.

County of Armstrong v. Coleman

99 Pa. 6 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1881

We are in no doubt as to the constitutionality of the Act of Assembly, approved May 25th 1878, entitled “ An act to provide for the payment of existing orders drawn by the military boards of the several counties of this Commonwealth … Next in order of time came the decision of this court in Wyoming County v. Bardwell, 3 Norris 104 (decided in 1877), in which it was held that the county was not liable for the payment of such orders.

Commonwealth v. Martin

534 Pa. 136 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 1993

Martin was directed to place his brown satchel on the ground. One of the detectives then directed the trained dog to perform a sniff search of Martin’s brown satchel. … As I stated in Florida v.

Lee, K., Aplt. v. PA Bd. of Prob. and Parole

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 30, 2014

v. … : : : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE : AND MICHAEL POTTEIGER, : CHAIRMAN, COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA

Save Ardmore Coalition v. Commonwealth

139 A.3d 1253 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 2016

Save Ardmore Coalition v. Commonwealth

635 Pa. 657 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 2016

ODC v. LeRoy Nathaniel Strickland

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 2016

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2075 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 86 DB 2014 : v … It is further ORDERED that Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Monongahela Navigation Co. v. Advance Coal Co.

194 Pa. 55 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1899

Justice Brown, The sole question involved in this appeal has been considered and passed upon in the case of Monongahela Navigation Company v. John A. Wood and Samuel L. Wood, doing business as John A.

Chamberlin v. Hite

5 Watts 373 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 1836

Com. 301; 2 Saund.,2 r; 2 Browne 173, 176 ; 2 Dall. 184 , 263. … We think, on the authority of Wilson v. Wallace, tbe court erred in allowing the amendment.

Damiani v. Lobasco

367 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1951

This Court has said, however,' in Rynd v. … See Brown v. Southern Ry. Co., 187 Fed. 481 , 39 Words and Phrases, p. 120.

Commonwealth v. Crucible Steel Co. of America

207 Pa. 308 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1904

Justice Brown, This case was argued with Commonwealth v, Danville Bess *309 emer Company, May term, 1903, No. 8, and, in view of wliat we have said in the opinion in that case, this day filed, the judgment is affirmed.

Commonwealth v. McKinley-Gregg Automobile Co.

345 Pa. 544 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1942

See Commonwealth v. Thomas Potter, Sons & Co., 159 Pa. 583 ; Knisely v. Cotterel, 196 Pa. 614 ; Commonwealth v. Harrisburg Light & Power Co., 284 Pa. 175 ; Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. Gormly, 173 Pa. 586, 588 ; Commonwealth v. Consolidated D. Beef Co., 245 Pa. 605, 607 ; Commonwealth v. Thorne, Neale & Co., 264 Pa. 408, 410 ; Commonwealth v.

Mixon v. Com.

783 A.2d 763 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 30, 2001

MIXON, Nathaniel Brown, Dolores Figueroa, Joseph Hill, Jeffrie S. McKinzie, William P. Alston and Maureen Williams, Appellants, v.

Sunseri v. Sunseri

358 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1947

Co. v. Bank, 338 Pa. 139 , 12 A. 2d 40 ; Great Oak B. & L. v. … See Antone v.