Case law

Chew v. Morton

10 Watts 321 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1840

On the first point the court below were clearly right in. deciding that the board of property had no power or authority to revoke or vacate a patent after it had been executed and delivered to the patentees. … In Foster v. Shaw, 7 Serg. & Rawle 161 , •this court held that the board of property had no legitimate power to vacate a patent, on the ground that it had been obtained by a forged conveyance.

ODC, Pet v. William Nivan Renwick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 14, 2015

THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2146 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 153 DB 2013 v … It is further ORDERED that Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Dubose, R. v. Willowcrest Nur. Home, Aplts.

173 A.3d 634 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 2017

The jury apportioned liability as 60% to Willowcrest, 25% to Einstein Healthcare Network, and 15% to Donna Brown. … C.J.S. § 7, at 24; see also School Board of Norfolk v.

Cherry v. City of Philadelphia

547 Pa. 679 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1997

. § 7541(c); 6 Penn Galvanizing Co. v. … In Lynch v. Owen J.

Bullock, M. v. PA Bd. of Prob. and Parole

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 2014

EASTERN DISTRICT MICHAEL BULLOCK, : No. 96 EM 2014 : Petitioner : : : v … BARKLEY, BOARD SECRETARY, (IN : HER OFFICIAL AND PERSONAL : CAPACITY), OFFICE OF THE : SECRETARY, 1101 S.

Turchi v. Phila Bd of License

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 24, 2015

: : : PHILADELPHIA BOARD OF LICENSE : AND INSPECTION REVIEW, AND : CONCERNED CITIZENS IN : … MARY : ELIZABETH TURCHI, : : Respondents : : : v

County of Armstrong v. Coleman

99 Pa. 6 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1881

We are in no doubt as to the constitutionality of the Act of Assembly, approved May 25th 1878, entitled “ An act to provide for the payment of existing orders drawn by the military boards of the several counties of this Commonwealth … Next in order of time came the decision of this court in Wyoming County v. Bardwell, 3 Norris 104 (decided in 1877), in which it was held that the county was not liable for the payment of such orders.

Bleight v. Manufacturers' & Mechanics' Bank

10 Pa. 131 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 1848

To the same purport is the case of Evans v. Kingsberry, 2 Rand. 120 . … That the legal estate is outstanding is nothing, and partition may be made notwithstanding, as is ruled in Willing v. Brown, 7 S. & R. 467. Judgment affirmed.

Commonwealth v. Martin

534 Pa. 136 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 1993

Martin was directed to place his brown satchel on the ground. One of the detectives then directed the trained dog to perform a sniff search of Martin’s brown satchel. … As I stated in Florida v.

Commonwealth v. Mezzanotti

219 Pa. 210 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1907

Justice Brown, For the reasons appearing in the opinion herewith filed in Commonwealth v. Ramunno, ante, p. 204, this appeal is dismissed and the judgment below affirmed.

Slater v. Rimar, Inc.

462 Pa. 138 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1975

See Middleburg v. Middleburg, 427 Pa. 114 , 233 A.2d 889 (1967); Seifert v. … Supp. 1352 (S.D.N.Y.1971), affirmed sub nom., Hall v. A. Corp., 453 F.2d 1375 (2d Cir. 1972); E. F. Hutton and Co. v. Brown, 305 F.Supp. 371, 376 (S.D.Tex.1969).

Commonwealth v. Crucible Steel Co. of America

207 Pa. 308 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1904

Justice Brown, This case was argued with Commonwealth v, Danville Bess *309 emer Company, May term, 1903, No. 8, and, in view of wliat we have said in the opinion in that case, this day filed, the judgment is affirmed.

Commonwealth v. McKinley-Gregg Automobile Co.

345 Pa. 544 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1942

See Commonwealth v. Thomas Potter, Sons & Co., 159 Pa. 583 ; Knisely v. Cotterel, 196 Pa. 614 ; Commonwealth v. Harrisburg Light & Power Co., 284 Pa. 175 ; Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. Gormly, 173 Pa. 586, 588 ; Commonwealth v. Consolidated D. Beef Co., 245 Pa. 605, 607 ; Commonwealth v. Thorne, Neale & Co., 264 Pa. 408, 410 ; Commonwealth v.

Appeal of Kartorie

486 Pa. 500 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 10, 1979

The Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners denied the application because Ms. … A state board of bar examiners could hardly perform this important function.

In re Anonymous No. 49 D.B. 77

20 Pa. D. & C.3d 587 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 1981

The panel determined that the brief would not be stricken in its entirety, but that Sections III, IV and V of the brief be stricken. … Argument V is merely a conclusion reiterating the previous arguments and expresses puzzlement at the “frenetic resistance offered to the Reinstatement Petition.”

Webster's Executors v. Newbold

41 Pa. 482 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 4, 1862

So in Groghegan v. Reed, 2 Wh. 152 , “nonresident” and beyond seas was replied to the plea of the statute. In Brown v. … Williams 144, and Brown v. Agnew, 6 W. & S. 238 .

Monongahela Navigation Co. v. McKinley Coal Co.

194 Pa. 54 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1899

Justice Brown, The sole question involved in this appeal has been considered and passed upon in the case of Monongahela Navigation Company v. John A. Wood and Samuel L. Wood, doing business as John A.

Kneebone, R. v. Lutz, P., Aplts.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 2022

See Commonwealth v. … See Lomas v.

Smolow v. Hafer

598 Pa. 561 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 2008

v. … Simon v. Wiessman, 2007 WL 2461707 , *5-7 (E.D.Pa., Aug.27, 2007) (discussing Smyth v.

Gas & Water Co. v. Borough of Downingtown

193 Pa. 255 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1899

In Mauch Chunk v. McGee, 81 Pa. 433 , Agnew, C. … In Commonwealth v.