Case law

ODC v. John Klinger Mort

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 2016

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2272 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 110 DB 2015 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Allen Estate

347 Pa. 364 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1943

Co. v. Pa. Sugar R. Co., 239 Pa. 456 , 86 A. 1074 . The pivotal question involved is whether certain legatees took a vested interest in remainder under the will of Anna C. Alien. … Such postponement of “distribution” or full “enjoyment” will not cause a delay in vesting: Brown’s Est., supra, p. 113.

Gerz v. Weber

151 Pa. 396 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1892

Gerz against the executors of his mother-in-law, Theresa Demarra, to recover for boarding the decedent, and for services rendered to her while she was an inmate of his family. … In such cases the presumption is strongly against the existence of any such relation as will justify the inference of any implied contract: Houck v. Houck, 99 Pa. 552 ; Patton v. Conn, 114 Pa. 186 .

Commonwealth v. Pacheco, D., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2021

In Carpenter v. … In United States v. Miller,29 and in Smith v.

ODC, Pet v. Edwin L. London

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 2015

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2201 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : Nos. 119 & 171 DB 2014 v … Respondent’s Petition for Waiver of Costs in Disciplinary Action in Accordance with Pa.R.D.E. 208(g) is denied, and he shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Wooley v. E. M. Wichert Co.

275 Pa. 167 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 1922

authority to make an award; and, in support of its contention, cited Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. … R. v. Welsh, 242 U. S. 303 . The judgment is affirmed.

Poulos v. Commonwealth

438 Pa. 442 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1970

A board of viewers awarded damages for the taking of $31,300, plus $4,466 in detention damages. … v.

Hudson Coal Company's Appeal

327 Pa. 247 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 1937

All owners and operators of coal lands in Lackawanna County severally appealed from the action of the Board of Assessment to the Court of Common Pleas. … However, it has been approved in special cases: see Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co.’s Assessment, 298 Pa. supra; Lehigh Valley Coal Company v. Luzerne Co., 255 Pa. 17 .

Delaware River Port Authority v. Thornburgh

508 Pa. 11 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 1985

Jurisdiction over matters arising exclusively out of contractual or quasi-contractual claims against the Com *17 monwealth lies in the Board of Claims. 3 Xpress Truck Lines, Inc. v. … Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 503 Pa. 399 , 469 A.2d 1000 (1983); Ezy Parks v. Larson, 499 Pa. 615 , 454 A.2d 928 (1982).

Cole, C. v. DEP; Apl of: Adelphia Gateway

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2025

: Environmental Hearing Board dated : October 9, 2019 at No. 2019-046-L. … As the Third Circuit explained in Township of Bordentown, New Jersey v.

ODC v. LeRoy Nathaniel Strickland

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 2016

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2075 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 86 DB 2014 : v … It is further ORDERED that Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

COMMONWEALTH OF PA., HIGHER ED. ASSISTANCE AGENCY v. Abington Mem. Hosp.

478 Pa. 514 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1978

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Board of Finance and Revenue of Commonwealth, 368 Pa. 463, 471 , 84 A.2d 495, 499 (1951). … National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc., 322 U.S. 111, 130-31 , 64 S.Ct. 851, 860 , 88 L.Ed. 1170 (1944).

In re Anonymous No. 9 D.B. 76

4 Pa. D. & C.3d 388 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 20, 1977

ANDERSON, Board Member, Pursuant to Rule 208(d) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement (Enforcement Rules), the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (board) herewith submits its find *389 … The court, in the cases of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.

Paolucci, E. v. UCBR, Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 2016

v. : 2012 dated 6/19/15 reversing the order : of the Unemployment Compensation : Board of Review at No. … B-11-09-D-E708 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION : dated 5/22/12 BOARD OF REVIEW, : : Appellant : ARGUED: May 11, 2016

Stauffer v. Penn Mutual Fire Ins. Assn. of Lancaster Co.

164 Pa. 199 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1894

Co., 153 Pa. 257 ; Hook v. Mutual Ins. Co., 160 Pa. 229 . … In Mentz v. Fire Ins.

Wright, J. v. Lower Salford Twp

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 2016

WRIGHT : No. 294 MAL 2016 : : v. … : : PETITION OF: LOWER SALFORD : TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL POLICE : PENSION FUND, LOWER SALFORD : TOWNSHIP BOARD

Scranton Gas & Water Co. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

225 Pa. 152 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 1909

Carnegie Company, 204 Pa. 459 ; Rudolph v. Schuylkill Railroad Company, 166 Pa. 430 ; Gaw v. Bristol, etc., R. R. Co., 196 Pa. 442 ; Oliver v. Thompson’s Run Bridge Company, 197 Pa. 344 . … In this case the board determined that the proposed change is necessary for the purposes indicated in the act, and that is conclusive of the matter: Wilson v. Pittsburg, etc., Railroad Company, 222 Pa. 541 .

Shambach v. Bickhart

577 Pa. 384 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2004

Decided March 26, 2004. *794 Michael V. Brown, for Gregory L. Shambach. Monna Accurti, for Bureau of Elections. Thomas C. Clark, Middleburg, for Richard W. Bickhart. … See generally Flanagan v.

West Mifflin Area School District v. Zahorchak

607 Pa. 153 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 2010

Comm’n v. … See Casino Free Phila. v. Pa.

ODC, Pet v. Adam J. Rodgers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 2019

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2192 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 215 DB 2015 : v … Respondent shall file monthly written reports with the Disciplinary Board; and 5. The other conditions of the June 1, 2016 Order shall remain in effect.