Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

2.00s

  • ODC v. Matthew I. Cohen

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 2016

    PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2290 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 165 DB 2015 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ODC v. Allan G. Gallimore

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 2015

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2200 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner : : No. 155 DB 2014 v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Parsowith v. Com., Dept. of Revenue

    555 Pa. 200 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1999

    and Revenue (the “Board”). … Co. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Chase's Executors v. Burkholder

    18 Pa. 48 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 1851

    Viner, Carth. 252 Such was the case in Badgley v. Beale, 3 Watts 263 , where the plaintiff sued on an engagement to act for wages as marker at an illicit *51 billiard table: Mitchell v. … Chitty on Con. 694; Swan v. Scott, 11 Ser. & R. 166.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • SEPTA v. City of Phila., Aplts.

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2014

    Similarly, in County of Venango v. … See, e.g., Frazier v. W.C.A.B.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Webster's Executors v. Newbold

    41 Pa. 482 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 4, 1862

    So in Groghegan v. Reed, 2 Wh. 152 , “nonresident” and beyond seas was replied to the plea of the statute. In Brown v. … Williams 144, and Brown v. Agnew, 6 W. & S. 238 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bowfin v. DEP; Apl of: Citizens

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 2026

    MAP 2023 SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF : ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND : Appeal from the Order of the INTERIM ACTING CHAIRPERSON OF : Commonwealth Court at No. 41 MD THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD … : Commonwealth Court at No. 41 MD THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD : 2022 dated November 1, 2023 : : ARGUED: May 13, 2025 v

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pa. Labor Rel. Bd. v. Afscme, Dist. 84

    515 Pa. 23 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 29, 1987

    515 Pa. 23 (1987) 526 A.2d 769 PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Appellant, v. … Bradley v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wooley v. E. M. Wichert Co.

    275 Pa. 167 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 1922

    authority to make an award; and, in support of its contention, cited Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. … R. v. Welsh, 242 U. S. 303 . The judgment is affirmed.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Matter of Huff

    399 Pa. Super. 574 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1991

    Grady at-, 110 S.Ct. at 2090 , citing Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). … Grady at-, n. 7, 110 S.Ct. at 2090, n. 7 , quoting, Brown *587 v. Ohio, supra 432 U.S. at 169 n. 7, 97 S.Ct. at 2227 n. 7. (Citations omitted.)

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Richards

    406 Pa. 452 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1962

    It looked like the place was all boarded up, you know, so I wouldn’t fall down. … Plaintiff’s first contention is answered and refuted by Brewster v. Morrone, 395 Pa. 642 , 151 A. 2d 607 , and McCreery v. Westmoreland Farm Bureau Co-operative Association, 357 Pa. 567 , 55 A. 2d 399 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Sands Bethworks Gaming, LLC v. Pa. Dep't of Revenue

    207 A.3d 315 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2019

    (the "Board"). … See, e.g. , Bitter v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Coleman v. Huffman

    348 Pa. 580 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1944

    See Jenkins et al. v. Baxter et al., 160 Pa. 199 , 28 A. 682 ; Bedford Springs Co. v. McMeen et al., 161 Pa. 639 , 29 A. 99 ; Hanna et al. v. … Hughes, 206 Pa. 526 , 56 A. 22 ; Griffiths v. Monongahela R. R. Co., 232 Pa. 639 , 81 A. 713 ; Paul v. Smith, 343 Pa. 63 , 21 A. (2d) 919.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Meyer v. Community College of Beaver County

    602 Pa. 156 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 30, 2009

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Baxter v. Phila. Bd. of Elections; of RNC

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 1, 2024

    See Genser[ v. Butler Cty. Bd. of Elections, ___ A.3d ___, 2024 WL 4553285 (Pa. Oct. 23, 2024)]; Center for Coalfield Justice v. Washington County Board of Elections (Pa. … See Crookston v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re: Magisterial District Judge Mark Bruno

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 2014

    V, § 18(a)(7). … V, § 18 of the Pennsylvania Constitution was extensively amended to create a Judicial Conduct Board to “receive and investigate complaints regarding judicial conduct filed by individuals or initiated by the board,” and

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shank v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.

    225 Pa. 393 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 1909

    Within a half an hour after he left, the electrician and the engineer went to the switch board and tested the circuit. … Co. v. Bell, 112 Pa. 400 ; Hughes v. Leonard, 199 Pa. 123 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Schmidt, M. v. Schmidt, Kirifides & Rassias (WCAB)

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 2025

    (Board’s Decision (Zurick, C., dissenting) at 4.) In a divided, reported opinion, an en banc panel of the Commonwealth Court reversed the Board’s order. Schmidt v. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 13 v. Commonwealth

    520 Pa. 363 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1989

    AFSCME v. Commonwealth, 80 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 611, 472 A.2d 746 (1984). … AFSCME, AFL-CIO v. Commonwealth, 111 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 81, 533 A.2d 785 (1987).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Graybar Electric Co. v. Pittsburgh School District

    378 Pa. 294 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1954

    In Brown & Zortman Machinery Company v. Pittsburgh, 375 Pa. 250 , 100 A. 2d 98 , the taxpayer had not failed to pay the correct amount of tax. … Penalty connotes punishment for fault, neglect or wrong, but the fault in the Brown & Zortman case was not the taxpayer’s. The case of H. J. Heinz Company v. School District of Pittsburgh, 170 Pa.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.