Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.74s
Dauphin Deposit Trust Co. v. Myers
401 Pa. 230 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1960
Banking Board, 383 Pa. 253, 256 , 118 A. 2d 561 (1955) ; Delaware County National Bank v. Campbell, 378 Pa. 311, 316-317 , 106 A. 2d 416 (1954) ; Kaufman Construction Co. v. … See for example, Philadelphia Saving Fund Society v. Banking Board, 383 Pa., supra.
Cited 22 timesPublished511 Pa. 481 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1986
The uncontroverted evidence at trial showed that Appellee was a pharmacist licensed by the State Board of Pharmacy. … See, Lehigh Valley Co-Op Farmers v. Com., Bureau of Employment Sec. Dept. of Labor and Industry, 498 Pa. 521 , 447 A.2d 948 (1982); 1 Pa.C.S. § 1921(c)(6). Appellee asserts our decision in Commonwealth v.
Cited 25 timesPublishedSEPTA v. City of Phila., Aplts.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2014
See id., at 450; see also Hazleton Area School District v. Zoning Hearing Board, 778 A.2d 1205 (Pa. 2001); County of Venango v. Borough of Sugarcreek, Zoning Hearing Board, 626 A.2d 489 (Pa. 1993). … See Saucon Valley School District v. Robert O., 785 A.2d 1069, 1076 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2001). In Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 2015
HIGGINS ARCHITECT, INC., : : Petitioners : : : v. … THE ESTATE : OF JUANITA HARMON, NADINE WHITE, : LINDA BELL, BERNARD DITOMO, : JENNIFER REYNOLDS, FELICIA HILL, : ROSEMARY KREUTZBERG, RODNEY : GEDDIS, SHIRLEY BALL AND STANLEY : BALL, H/W, BETTY BROWN
Cited 0 timesPublishedWest Leechburg Borough v. Allegheny Township School Directors
300 Pa. 73 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1930
sections 101 and 210 of the School Code of 1911, as originally enacted, the decree of incorporation carried with it the coincident creation of a separate school district, the classification of which and appointment of a board … Here then the parties were not the same, nor was the subject matter of the actions identical: Siegfried v. Boyd, 237 Pa. 55 ; Hunt v. Snyder, 261 Pa. 257 ; Com. ex rel. v. Kelly et al., 287 Pa. 139 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 2016
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2275 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 164 DB 2014 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Cited 0 timesPublishedChepkevich v. Hidden Valley Resort, L.P.
607 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 2010
boarded safely. … Fox v.
Cited 84 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2016
lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A OFF|CE OF D|SC|PL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 2308 Disciplinary DOCket NO. 3 Petitioner : No. 137 DB 2015 v. : Colorado Registration No. 37875 BRENDAN J. l\/|AGEE, : (Out of State) Respondent … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E.ZOS(g).
Cited 0 timesPublishedWest Rockhill Twp v. DEP; Apl of: Adelphia Gateway
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 2025
: Environmental Hearing Board dated : October 9, 2019 at No. 2019-046-L. … As the Third Circuit explained in Township of Bordentown, New Jersey v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSaladworks v. WCAB Appeal of: Uninsured Employers
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 2016
WESCO : No. 52 MAP 2016 INSURANCE COMPANY : : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court at No. 1789 CD v … : 2014 dated 10/6/15, reconsideration : denied 11/23/15, reversing the decision of : the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board
Cited 0 timesPublished399 Pa. 84 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1960
concerning the amended language of §1401-4, the provision is invalid. *87 The rule we have established as to the necessity for holding additional public hearings on amendments to proposed ordinances was clearly stated in Schultz v. … We agree with the zoning board that an outdoor swimming pool with its attendant bathhouse and canteen are plainly “facilities structurally designed for sports and athletic events.”
Cited 17 timesPublishedIn Re: Order Temporarily Modifying Pa Rule of Continuing Legal Education
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 2020
: : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2020, upon the recommendation of the Pennsylvania Continuing Legal Education Board … (the “Board”), IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, and Rule 1952(A) of the Rules of Judicial Administration, that Rule 108 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Continuing Legal
Cited 0 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 2017
|N THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A OFF|CE OF DlSClPL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 2335 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner No. 130 DB 2016 Attorney Registration No. 315189 V- (l\/|ontgomery County) KEV|N C. … Respondent shall pay the costs incurred loy the Disciplinary Board in the investigation and prosecution of this matter.
Cited 0 timesPublishedODC, Pet v. Jeffrey Dale Mohler
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 2017
: No. 2311 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : 169 DB 2016 : v … Respondent shall pay the costs incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the investigation and prosecution of this matter.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 2016
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2270 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 98 DB 2015 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Cited 0 timesPublished103 Pa. 331 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1883
It is true, Hosie v. Gray, 23 P. F. Smith 502, does rule, that, the recognizance of bail in error, where the proceedings were by scire facias on a mortgage, need not be in double the amount of the judgment. … It does not appear that other property may not be made liable for the debt secured by the mortgage. , Then, under the authority of Brown v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 5, 2018
FACULTIES : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the Petitioner’s first issue, as stated by Petitioner: Did the Commonwealth Court err when it reversed the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
Cited 0 timesPublishedODC, Pet v. John Anthony Costalas
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2016
lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A OFF|CE OF DlSClPL|NARY COUNSEL, : No. 2236 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner No. 217 DB 2015 Attorney Registration No. 93501 V- (Delaware County) JOHN ANTHONY COSTALAS Respondent … Respondent shall pay the costs incurred loy the Disciplinary Board in the investigation and prosecution of this matter.
Cited 0 timesPublished92 Pa. 112 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1880
He may renew an accommodation endorsement, and give notes to liquidate the partnership indebtedness: Dundas v. Gallagher, 4 Barr 205; Robinson v. Taylor, Id. 242; Brown v. Clark, 2 Harris 469; Ward v. Tyler, 2 P. F. … Hopkinson et al. v. Leeds, 28 P. F. Smith 396. It was well said in that case by Mr.
Cited 11 timesPublishedGalant v. COM., DEPT. OF ENV. RES.
534 Pa. 17 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 1993
Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 9 Pa.Commw. 176, 183, 305 A.2d 757, 761 (1973), quoting Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co., 268 Pa. 163, 166 , 110 A. 731, 732 (1920). See Misitis v. … board’s scope of review.
Cited 29 timesPublished
Ask Donna