Case law

Parker, H. v. WCAB (Allegheny)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 2017

PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY : No. 30 WAL 2017 : : v … Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v

McADOO BOR. v. COM., PA. LABOR REL. BD.

506 Pa. 422 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 1984

The Borough appealed that order to the Commonwealth Court, which reversed the Board's decision. [3] McAdoo Borough v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 79 Pa.Commw. 158, 469 A.2d 693 (1983). … See Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 40 Pa.Commw. 468, 397 A.2d 858 (1979); Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v.

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Berry

68 Pa. 272 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 1871

Railroad Co. v. Brown, 4 P. F. Smith 77; but the proof of the contract should be clear. Especially should this be the rule when the alleged contract would contradict the papers accompanying the transaction. … I may add, however, the following references to show the difference between the practice under the English statute and the Pennsylvania acts : Downing v. Baldwin, 1 S. & R. 298; Brown v. Caldwell, 10 Id. 114 ; Bailey v.

Bausch v. Fidler

277 Pa. 573 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 1923

This part of the award is in direct accord with Sharcheck v. … As held in Lente v.

Girsh v. Rolland

282 Pa. 327 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1925

Appellant has not made it plain that the refusal of judgment was “manifestly wrong, in the sense of being contrary to precedent or established rules of law” (Mancia *328 v. Marquette N. Fire Ins. … Co., 280 Pa. 174, 176 ); therefore, it is not “clear and free from doubt that the court below erred,” and, under such circumstances, we never interfere: Brown v. Unger, 269 Pa. 471, 472 ; see also Snyder v.

Zehner v. Wilkinson Memorial United Methodist Church

399 Pa. Super. 165 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1990

Zehner admits that, at the time the board voted on the addition of these items, she was a member of that board. … In arriving at its conclusion that she could not recover from the association, the Court cited Koogler v. Koogler, 127 Ohio St. 57 , 186 N.E. 725 (1933).

Commonwealth v. Mays

977 A.2d 1131 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 17, 2009

977 A.2d 1131 (2009) COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. Marcus MAYS, Appellant. No. 11 EAP 2008 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 22, 2008. Decided August 17, 2009. Richard T. … Brown, Jr., Esq., for Marcus Mays. Hugh J. Burns, Jr., Esq., Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, Grady Gervino, Esq., for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Commonwealth v. Talarico

317 Pa. 481 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1935

In Com. v. … In Udderzook v.

Frumento v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REV.

466 Pa. 81 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 1976

Moyer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra. … See Davis v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 187 Pa.Super. 116 , 144 A.2d 452 (1958). In Morgan v.

Baxter v. Phila. Bd. of Elections; of RNC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 1, 2024

: No. 76 EM 2024 KINNIRY : : : v. … : No. 77 EM 2024 KINNIRY : : : v.

Commonwealth v. Loughnane

173 A.3d 733 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 2017

Brown, 510 F.3d 57, 6566 (1st Cir. 2007) (concluding that under the Dunn factors, the top of Brown’s driveway next to his garage and his trailer was not part of the curtilage). … See Coolidge v.

Commonwealth v. Loughnane

173 A.3d 733 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 2017

Brown, 510 F.3d 57, 6566 (1st Cir. 2007) (concluding that under the Dunn factors, the top of Brown’s driveway next to his garage and his trailer was not part of the curtilage). … See Coolidge v.

Zwick, M. v. WCAB (Popchocoj)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 2015

90 EAL 2015 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Commonwealth Court v … 91 EAL 2015 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Commonwealth Court v

Langhorne Spring Water Co. Appeal

437 Pa. 298 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1970

See: Miller Estate v. Department of Highways, 424 Pa. 477, 481-82 , 227 A. 2d 679 (1967). … V, §515, 26 P.S. §1-515).

Riverlife Task Force v. Planning Commission

600 Pa. 378 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 2009

On July 17, 2008, this Court affirmed the Board’s Order. Station Square Gaming L.P. v. … Jubelirer v. Rendell, 598 Pa. 16 , 953 A.2d 514, 521 (2008) (quotation omitted). 12 .

Feister, W. v. WCAB (Mellinger Transport)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 2015

: No. 434 MAL 2015 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from v … : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (MELLINGER : TRANSPORTATION, INC.

Commonwealth v. Hood

392 Pa. Super. 388 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1990

The State Board of Dentistry, a dental council and examining board as specified in 63 Pa.S.A. § 121, has defined a dental hygienist as follows: One who is legally licensed as such by the Board to remove tartar deposits, accretions … Commonwealth v. Ohle, supra (citations omitted); see also Commonwealth v.

In re Anonymous No. 56 D.B. 94

28 Pa. D. & C.4th 398 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 30, 1995

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Braun, 520 Pa. 157 , 553 A.2d *406 894 (1989). … Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lucarini, 504 Pa. 271 , 472 A.2d 186 (1983). In In re Anonymous Nos. 101 D.B. 88 and 17 D.B. 89, 10 D.

In re Anonymous No. 73 D.B. 84

37 Pa. D. & C.3d 98 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1985

See Disciplinary Counsel v. Ewing, 496 Pa. 35 , 436 A.2d 139 (1981). IV. … V. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania hereby adopts the following conclusions of law of the hearing committee in this proceeding: 1.

Clemson v. Davidson

5 Binn. 392 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 1813

The case of Walton and Fillis v. … It has been made very clear to me, that the ship owner had no lien on the goods put on board," beyond the compensation for the taking on board, the stowage, unshipping and putting on the wharf again, and the demurrage to