Case law

Abington Heights SD v. PLRB Pet of: AH Educ Assoc

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 2022

MIDDLE DISTRICT ABINGTON HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT : No. 126 MAL 2022 : : v … Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS : BOARD

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Frankel

68 Pa. D. & C.4th 169 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 2004

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania: BROWN, Member, — Pursuant to Rule 208(d)(2)(iii) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme … Oral argument was held on January 8, 2004, before a three-member panel of the Disciplinary Board chaired by Laurence H. Brown, Esquire, with Members Marc S. Raspanti, Esquire, and C. Eugene McLaughlin.

Loeb Estate

400 Pa. 368 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1960

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Board of Finance & Revenue, 368 Pa. 463 , 84 A. 2d 495 ; 25 R.C.L. 1043, §274; 42 Am. Jur., Public Administrative Law, §78; Logan v. Davis, 233 U. S. 613, 627 ; Commonwealth v. … Brown’s Estate, 208 Pa. 161, 164 , 57 A. 360 ; Spangenberg Estate, 359 Pa. 353, 355 , 59 A. 2d 103 .

Matter of Larsen

532 Pa. 326 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 1992

Co. v. … Consequently, the Board has followed the general rule of leaving recusal motions to the discretion of the Board member against whom the motion is addressed. Cf. Matter of Chiovero, supra, 570 A.2d at 60 . Goodheart v.

Commonwealth v. Hood

392 Pa. Super. 388 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1990

The State Board of Dentistry, a dental council and examining board as specified in 63 Pa.S.A. § 121, has defined a dental hygienist as follows: One who is legally licensed as such by the Board to remove tartar deposits, accretions … Commonwealth v. Ohle, supra (citations omitted); see also Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey

358 Pa. 326 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 1947

Minerd v. Margiotti, 325 Pa. 17, 21-23 , 188 A. 524 ; 5 Am. Jur., page 231, et seq.) reveals no basis for the Commonwealth’s contention. … L. 326, 46 PS Section 156, requiring strict construction (Thompson v. Morrison, 352 Pa. 616 , 44 A. 2d 55 ; Bartron v.

ODC, Pet v. Keith Hall Barkley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2017

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2411 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 144 DB 2016 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Pilchesky v. Lackawanna County

624 Pa. 633 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2014

In support of his position, Pilchesky relies upon McCaskey v. Allegheny County Dept. of Elections, 139 Pa.Cmwlth. 229 , 590 A.2d 77 (1991); Wolfgang v. … Pilchesky fails to cite to Lyons v.

Commonwealth v. Loughnane

173 A.3d 733 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 2017

Brown, 510 F.3d 57, 6566 (1st Cir. 2007) (concluding that under the Dunn factors, the top of Brown’s driveway next to his garage and his trailer was not part of the curtilage). … See Coolidge v.

Langhorne Spring Water Co. Appeal

437 Pa. 298 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1970

See: Miller Estate v. Department of Highways, 424 Pa. 477, 481-82 , 227 A. 2d 679 (1967). … V, §515, 26 P.S. §1-515).

In Re Escheat of Moneys in Custody of United States Treasury

326 Pa. 260 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1937

Since no new matter is presented, we affirm so much of the decree of the court as follows: “Whereas, in the matter of Alice Frances Brown et al. v.

Dickun v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

308 Pa. 20 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1932

These platforms were used by passengers to board or alight from cars. … The *23 case is controlled by the principles set forth in Klingensmith v. West Penn Rys. Co., supra, and cases there cited. Judgment affirmed.

Dash v. Wilap Corp.

343 Pa. Super. 584 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 5, 1985

Bily v. Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment, 353 Pa. 49, 52 , 44 A.2d 250, 252 (1945). … For example, in Sykes v.

Dyer v. Wightman

66 Pa. 425 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 1870

It is also equally well settled that a taking by the sovereign under the right of eminent domain is not an eviction: Frost v. Earnest, 4 Whart. 90 ; Dobbins v. Brown, 2 Jones 75 ; Boss v. … Nor are the cases of Frost v. Earnest, 4 Whart. 86 , and Dobbins v. Brown, 2 Jones 75 , inconsistent with this view.

Parker, H. v. WCAB (Allegheny)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 2017

PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY : No. 30 WAL 2017 : : v … Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v

Kuhn v. Commonwealth

291 Pa. 497 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 1927

L. 433, and the duty of their preparation and distribution was committed to the board of game commissioners. … A municipality is bound only by the authorized acts of its agents: Shields v. Hitchman, 251 Pa. 455 ; Consolidated Beef Co. v. Phila., 245 Pa. 268 ; Bartholomew v. Lehigh Co., 148 Pa. 82 ; York Gazette Co. v.

Stuart v. Harkins

3 Binn. 321 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1811

It is said in Browne v. … The reporter recollects perfectly well, that after the decision of the court had been given, the late Judge Smith said, “ the law has been set- “ tied ever since the case in Salkeld,” probably referring to Browne v.

Protect PT v. Penn Twp ZHB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 2021

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : PENN TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING : BOARD AND OLYMPUS

Commonwealth v. Reynolds

137 Pa. 389 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1891

In Reading v. … The test, as we said in Frost v.

Protect PT v. Penn Twp ZHB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 2021

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : PENN TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING : BOARD AND OLYMPUS