Case law

Commonwealth v. Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey

358 Pa. 326 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 1947

Minerd v. Margiotti, 325 Pa. 17, 21-23 , 188 A. 524 ; 5 Am. Jur., page 231, et seq.) reveals no basis for the Commonwealth’s contention. … L. 326, 46 PS Section 156, requiring strict construction (Thompson v. Morrison, 352 Pa. 616 , 44 A. 2d 55 ; Bartron v.

Pilchesky v. Lackawanna County

624 Pa. 633 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2014

In support of his position, Pilchesky relies upon McCaskey v. Allegheny County Dept. of Elections, 139 Pa.Cmwlth. 229 , 590 A.2d 77 (1991); Wolfgang v. … Pilchesky fails to cite to Lyons v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kissel

497 Pa. 467 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1982

The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (hereinafter “Board”) recommended that respondent, Douglas J. … Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grigsby, 493 Pa. 194 , 425 A.2d 730 (1981) (citations omitted).

Commonwealth v. Loughnane

173 A.3d 733 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 2017

Brown, 510 F.3d 57, 6566 (1st Cir. 2007) (concluding that under the Dunn factors, the top of Brown’s driveway next to his garage and his trailer was not part of the curtilage). … See Coolidge v.

Langhorne Spring Water Co. Appeal

437 Pa. 298 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1970

See: Miller Estate v. Department of Highways, 424 Pa. 477, 481-82 , 227 A. 2d 679 (1967). … V, §515, 26 P.S. §1-515).

Dash v. Wilap Corp.

343 Pa. Super. 584 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 5, 1985

Bily v. Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment, 353 Pa. 49, 52 , 44 A.2d 250, 252 (1945). … For example, in Sykes v.

Dyer v. Wightman

66 Pa. 425 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 1870

It is also equally well settled that a taking by the sovereign under the right of eminent domain is not an eviction: Frost v. Earnest, 4 Whart. 90 ; Dobbins v. Brown, 2 Jones 75 ; Boss v. … Nor are the cases of Frost v. Earnest, 4 Whart. 86 , and Dobbins v. Brown, 2 Jones 75 , inconsistent with this view.

Coyne v. Prichard

272 Pa. 424 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1922

Blankenburg, 241 Pa. 394 ; Com. ex rel. v. Underwood, 269 Pa. 36 ; Com. ex rel. v. Pittsburgh, 204 Pa. 219 ; Douglas v. McLean, 25 Pa. Superior Ct. 9 ; Chester v. Paxson, 76 Pa. Superior Ct. 40 . … This board has the power to regulate and restrict the areas in which trades and business of various kinds can be carried on.

Stuart v. Harkins

3 Binn. 321 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1811

It is said in Browne v. … The reporter recollects perfectly well, that after the decision of the court had been given, the late Judge Smith said, “ the law has been set- “ tied ever since the case in Salkeld,” probably referring to Browne v.

Protect PT v. Penn Twp ZHB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 2021

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : PENN TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING : BOARD AND OLYMPUS

ODC v. Andrea D. Goodrich

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 3, 2019

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2627 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 102 DB 2019 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Commonwealth v. Reynolds

137 Pa. 389 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1891

In Reading v. … The test, as we said in Frost v.

Protect PT v. Penn Twp ZHB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 2021

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : Commonwealth Court : : PENN TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING : BOARD AND OLYMPUS

ODC v. Robert B. MacIntyre

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 2018

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2532 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 104 DB 2018 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Commonwealth v. Middleton

210 Pa. 582 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1905

Pee Ctjeiam, In Stegmaier v. Jones, 203 Pa. 47 , and again in Com. ex rel. Miller v. … As said in Stegmaier v.

Cunningham v. Mitchell

67 Pa. 78 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1871

So in Paul v. Vankirk, 6 Binney 124, Ch. J. … When the warrant is issued by one having no authority it will not protect, as held in Stephen v. Wilkins, 6 Barr 260, and Hilbish v. Hower, 8 P. F.

Cawley v. American Railway Express Co.

276 Pa. 160 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1923

Proof of the latter element is not required under our act (Callihan v. … For the reasons stated, we cannot agree with the view of the court below and the compensation board.

Zehner v. Wilkinson Memorial United Methodist Church

399 Pa. Super. 165 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1990

Zehner admits that, at the time the board voted on the addition of these items, she was a member of that board. … In arriving at its conclusion that she could not recover from the association, the Court cited Koogler v. Koogler, 127 Ohio St. 57 , 186 N.E. 725 (1933).

ODC v. Brian Joseph Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 2019

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2610 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 236 DB 2018 : v … He shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

ODC, Pet v. Frank G. Fina

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 2020

Petitioner : No. 166 DB 2017 : : Attorney Registration No. 71711 v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g). Justice Wecht files a concurring statement in which Justice Donohue joins.