Case law

McGee v. L. F. Grammes & Sons, Inc.

485 Pa. 643 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 1979

On March 23, 1978, this Court filed an opinion in which we reversed a Commonwealth Court order affirming the Workmen’s Compensation Board’s (Board) decision which would have sustained a referee’s suspension of a compensation … McGee v. L. F. Grammes & Sons, Inc., 477 Pa. 143 , 383 A.2d *645 864 (1978). Grammes had initially petitioned on July 1, 1970 to terminate the agreement alleging that the disability had ended on November 26, 1968.

ODC v. Bret Keisling

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 2018

PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2502 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 65 DB 2017 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

ODC, Pet v. Ephraim Tahir R. Mella

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 2021

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2759 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 96 DB 2019 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Commonwealth v. Talarico

317 Pa. 481 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1935

In Com. v. … In Udderzook v.

ODC v. Thomas Allen Crawford, Jr.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2017

PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2138 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 160 DB 2014 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Commonwealth v. Moroz

444 Pa. 493 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1971

West v. Rundle, supra [ 428 Pa. 102 , 237 A. 2d 196 ], has the burden of proving this contention.” See also Commonwealth v. Enty, 442 Pa. 39 , 271 A. 2d 926 ; Commonwealth v. Brown, 443 Pa. 21 , 275 A. 2d 332 (1971). … See also Commonwealth v. Brown, 443 Pa., supra. We need only examine the tMrd criterion to find that appellant has not met his burden of proof.

Fisher Controls Co. v. Commonwealth

476 Pa. 119 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1977

Koppers Co., supra; Stillman v. Tax Review Board, supra. In Amidon v. … See, e. g., Commonwealth v. Koppers Co., supra; Cumberland Coal Co. v. Board of Revision, supra.

Alderwoods PA, Aplt. v. PUC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 2017

: Appellant : : : v. … BROWN, CHAIRMAN, THE : HONORABLE ANDREW G. PLACE, VICE : CHAIRMAN, THE HONORABLE JOHN F. : COLEMAN, JR., COMMISSIONER, THE : HONORABLE ROBERT F.

Bombaugh v. Miller

82 Pa. 203 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1876

Keesler, 14 Barb. 611 ; Smiles v. Hastings, 24 Id. 44; Erb v. Brown, 19 P. F. Smith 216. It is true in Nitzell v. Paschall, supra, Mr. … This latter view of the law is affirmed in Erb v. Brown, supra. So in Linderman v.

Hudyck v. Wyoming Shovel Works

299 Pa. 182 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1929

The board determined in favor of a total disability. … In Bausch v. Fidler, 277 Pa. 573 , claimant was paid in full for 175 weeks for a broken arm and leg. He filed a petition to amend the agreement to provide for definite losses, and the compensation was so extended.

ODC, Pet v. Matthew Gerald Porsch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 29, 2020

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2704 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 248 DB 2018 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Evans v. West Norriton Township Municipal Authority

370 Pa. 150 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1952

Oil City v. Oil City Boiler Works, 152 Pa. 348 , 25 A. 549 ; Hammett v. Philadelphia, 65 Pa. 146 ; Michener v. Philadelphia, 118 Pa. 535 , 12 A. 174 ; Harrisburg v. Segelbaum, 151 Pa. 172 , 24 A. 1070 . … . * Furthermore, the analogous (so-called) “School Board cases” uphold the constitutionality of acts which authorize school boards, school districts or similar bodies to administer schools and the school systems, and to impose

In the Matter of: Maria v. Go

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 8, 2016

Member dated August 25, 2016, is approved and it is ORDERED that Maria V. … The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Harris by Harris v. Easton Pub. Co.

335 Pa. Super. 141 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1984

Vogel v. W.T. Grant Co., supra; see also Wells v. Thomas, 569 F.Supp. 426 (E.D.Pa. 1983). But see Fogel v. … Brown v. Mullarkey, 632 S.W.2d 507 (Mo.App.1982); Forsher v. Bugliosi, 26 Cal.3d 792 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 628 , 608 P.2d 716 (1980).

In re Anonymous No. 126 D.B. 92

26 Pa. D. & C.4th 427 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1995

See Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Geisler, 532 Pa. 56, 60 , 614 A.2d 1134, 1136 (1992) and In re Anonymous No. 58 D.B. 89, 10 D.&C.4th 545, 553 (1990). … Compare Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Duffield, 537 Pa. 485, 499 , 644 A.2d 1186, 1192-93 (1994). In light of these factors, the board believes that suspension is the most appropriate discipline for imposition. V.

Fawcett v. Monongahela Railway Co.

391 Pa. 134 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 1958

In Gardner v. … “The result is that, whereas,. under the Railway Labor Act, the Adjustment Board has exclusive jurisdiction to adjust grievances ■ and jurisdictional- disputes-of the type involved-in the Slocum ■ case, that *139 Board does

Lockney v. Police Beneficiary Ass'n

217 Pa. 568 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1907

custom was sufficiently and clearly established so as to charge the appellee’s husband with notice of the assessment, was left by the learned court below for determination by the jury, and in this we see no error: McMasters v. … In order to establish the validity of a custom or usage it must have existed so long as to have become generally known, and it must be clearly and distinctly proved: Adams v. Pittsburg Insurance Company, 95 Pa. 348 .

Commonwealth v. Styles

494 Pa. 524 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1981

Commonwealth v. Brown, 489 Pa. 285 , 414 A.2d 70 (1980); Commonwealth v. Peterson, 453 Pa. 187 , 307 A.2d 264 (1973). … Commonwealth v. Brown, supra. At trial, there was no question that appellant shot and killed Ferrell; the only issue was whether the shooting was intentional or accidental.

In re Anonymous 31 D.B. 79

21 Pa. D. & C.3d 510 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 1981

Disciplinary action was brought against him for making a false statement to the board and for failing to comply with an order of the board. … of the board and ordered six months suspension.

Fink v. Hake

6 Watts 131 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1837

The principles laid down in Lodge v. Hamilton, 2 Serg. & Rawle 492 , and Wintercost v. Smith, 4 Rawle 177 , would seem to decide this case in favour of the plaintiff. … See Brown v. Shore, 1 Show. 26. And in Pheasant v. Pheasant, 1 Chan. Ca. 181, S.