Case law

ODC v. Matthew Todd Croslis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 2019

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2589 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 171 DB 2018 : v … He shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Parker v. Parker

335 Pa. Super. 348 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1984

First Fidelity Savings and Loan Association, 238 Md. 386 , 209 A.2d 546 (1965) (and cases cited therein); Gerold v. Gerold, 6 Or.App. 353 , 488 *352 P.2d 294 (1971); see also, Brown v. … Brown, 32 Ohio App.2d 139 , 288 N.E.2d 852 (1972) (social security benefits); Meadows v. Meadows, Okl., 619 P.2d 598 (1980) (workman’s compensation benefits); Dillard v. Dillard, Tx.App., 341 S.W.2d 668 (1960).

Philadelphia v. Women's Christian Ass'n

125 Pa. 572 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1889

girls webe furnished with one week’s board *579 and washing of clothing free of all cost. … The same is true of Thiel College v. The County of Mercer, 101 Pa. 530 .

Borello v. COM., UNEMPLOYMENT COMP. BD.

490 Pa. 607 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 1980

Unemployment *620 Compensation Board of Review v. Tickle, supra . … Wright v. Com., Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 45 Pa.Cmwlth. 375 , 405 A.2d 991 (1979); Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. G.C.

Commonwealth v. Graves

461 Pa. 118 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1975

See Commonwealth v. Ingram, supra; Commonwealth v. Brown, 436 Pa. 423 , 260 A.2d 742 (1970); Commonwealth v. Walters, 431 Pa. 74 , 244 A.2d 757 (1968); Commonwealth v. … Ingram, supra; Commonwealth v. Reid, supra; Commonwealth v. Walters, supra; Commonwealth v. Brown, supra. .

Peters v. Delaware Insurance

5 Serg. & Rawle 473 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 1820

Or, as it is defined by Lord Mansfield, in Godin v. … As in Rogers v. Davis, and Davis v. Gildart, Marshall, 147, the termini oí the voyage were not the same, and one policy contained an exception of American capture.

Metropolitan Edison Co.'s Appeal

307 Pa. 401 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1932

Valley Coal Co. v. … Avalon Borough School District, 291 Pa. 252, 254 ; Westmoreland Chemical & Color Co. v.

In the Matter of: Thomas Henry Speranza

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 2019

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2254 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 38 DB 2016 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

In the Matter of: Keith Francis Garrity Sr.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 2019

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2599 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 199 DB 2018 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

In Re: Adoption of New Rules of Judicial Administration 601-607 and Rescission of Rules 16-22 and 81 of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2015

Senior magisterial district judges may petition the Board for a waiver of this requirement. … V § 18; see also 207 Pa.Code Part III (Judicial Conduct Board Rules of Procedure) and Part IV (Court of Judicial Discipline Rules of Procedure).

Commonwealth v. Ragnar Benson, Inc.

482 Pa. 224 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1978

The Sales Tax Board of Review denied Benson’s petition. Benson then sought relief by filing a petition for review with the Board of Finance and Revenue. … See Commonwealth v. Beck Electric Construction, Inc., 32 Pa.Cmwlth. 229 , 379 A.2d 626 (1977). The order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed. POMEROY, J., concurs in the result.

Brownsville Area School District v. Alberts

436 Pa. 429 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1970

Appellant relies upon Johnson v. United School District Joint School Board, 201 Pa. Superior Ct. 375 , 191 A. 2d 897 (1963). … Board of Public Education, School District of Philadelphia v. Soler, 406 Pa. 168, 177 , 176 A. 2d 653 (1961).

Greenwood Gaming & Entertainment, Inc. v. Commonwealth

625 Pa. 55 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 2014

Greenwood Gaming and Entertainment, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 29 A.3d 1215 (Pa.Cmwlth.2011). … Dist. v.

Fitzgerald v. Philadelphia

376 Pa. 379 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 1954

Hutchinson v. Magee, 278 Pa. 119 , 122 A. 234 ; Pawell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 146 Pa. Superior Ct. 147 , 22 A. 2d 43 .) … Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91, 102, 103 ; Garner v. Board of Public Works of Los Angeles, 341 U.S. 716, 723 . In Wieman v.

ODC v. Stacy Parks Miller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 8, 2019

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2436 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 32 DB 2017 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Klemow Estate

411 Pa. 136 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 1963

and meals for 18 years, and (c) that he never paid for board, meals and personal care in the last six months of his illness. … Furthermore, no recovery can be had against a decedent’s estate for services rendered in expectation.of a legacy: Consentino v. Vittoria, 394 Pa., supra; Braden Estate, 363 Pa. 42 , 68 A. 2d 734 . In Consentino v.

Black Pol. Emp. v. Schmidt, A.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 2024

Wilson v. Com., Dept. of Comm. and Econ. … .’”); Sprague v. Casey, 550 A.2d 184, 189 (Pa. 1988) (“[U]nless all indispensable parties are made parties to an action, a court is powerless to grant relief. . . .

ODC v. Lokanath, M.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 3, 2019

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2622 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 73 DB 2019 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Kaplan v. Philadelphia School District

388 Pa. 213 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1957

Nor does the Act in any way limit the authority of the School Board to suspend for cause. It would be most extraordinary if it did. The lower Court cites the case of Intille v. Hoyer, 88 D. & C. 512. … (Gentner v. Board of Education of Los Angeles, 219 Cal. 135 .)

ODC v. Amanda Iannuzzelli

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 2019

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2603 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 196 DB 2017 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).