Case law

Rupert v. Policemen's Relief & Pension Fund

387 Pa. 627 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1957

McGovern et al., Commissioners, 316 Pa. 161 , 174 A. 400 ; McBride v. Allegheny County Retirement Board et al., 330 Pa. 402 , 199 A. 130 ; Kane v. … Retirement Board of Allegheny County, 374 Pa. 165 , 97 A. 2d 231 ; Hickey v. Pittsburgh Pension Board, 378 Pa. 300 , 106 A. 2d 233 . In Kane v.

Gardner v. Allegheny County

393 Pa. 120 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1958

Upon appeal, this Court decided in Gardner v. … Zambelli, 392 Pa. 24 , 139 A. 2d 644 ; Eways v. Reading Parking Authority, 385 Pa. 592 , 124 A. 2d 92 ; Gardner v. Allegheny County, 382 Pa., supra.

Commonwealth v. Brenizer

477 Pa. 534 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1978

The United States Supreme Court, in North Carolina v. … In Commonwealth v. Pearson, 450 Pa. 467 , 303 A.2d 481 (1973), this court stated: “. . . As ruled in North Carolina v.

ODC, Pet v. Gelb, N.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 20, 2019

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2598 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 174 DB 2018 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Erny Trust

415 Pa. 8 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1964

In *14 Anshutz v. … This Court, in an entirely different factual situation, in Brown v.

Lapayowker v. Lincoln College Preparatory School

386 Pa. 167 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1956

the controlling shares were registered in her name, plaintiff never manifested any of the common indicia of ownership such as an active role in conducting the school, a demand for an accounting of profits, attendance at board … See also Peardon v. Peardon, 365 Pa. 13 , and Stewart v. Hooks (et al.), 372 Pa. 542 . Knecht v. Reichard, 60 Pa. Superior Ct. 273 ; Brown v. Nagle, 118 Pa. Superior Ct. 234 .

In the Matter of: Marko David Maylack

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2020

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2689 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 216 DB 2019 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

ODC v. Michael Christopher Gallo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 2018

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2365 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 121 DB 2017 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Haines v. O'Conner

10 Watts 313 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1840

If the case of Browne v, Dysinger, 1 Rawle 408 , has been understood to have ruled, “ that if I proclaim that I hold my house for B,' on terms of conveying to. him when he shall reimburse me what I have paid, it is a trust … A contrary doctrine is taught in Kepler v. Kepler, 2 Watts 327 , and in the recent case of Robertson v. Robertson, 9 Watts 42 .

ODC v. Douglas B. Breidenbach, Jr.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 2019

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2615 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 89 DB 2019 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Azoulay, A. v. Phila. ZBA

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 30, 2019

AZOULAY, IDIT AZOULAY AND : No. 586 EAL 2018 ASSAF LAVON : : : Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal v … : from the Order of the Commonwealth : Court : PHILADELPHIA ZONING BOARD OF : ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF

S. Bethlehem Assoc. v. ZHB of Bethlehem Twp

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 2022

MIDDLE DISTRICT SOUTH BETHLEHEM ASSOCIATES, LP : No. 95 MAL 2021 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court ZONING HEARING BOARD

Murray v. G. F. Higgins Co.

300 Pa. 341 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 1930

Co. v. … Co. v. Brown (No. 2), supra.”

Chalfant v. Edwards

176 Pa. 67 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 28, 1896

The act of 1869 fixed their relation to the board of education for the city, and for certain purposes relating to the conduct of the schools subjected them to the supervision of that board; but it did not change their powers … Among them we may mention Best v. Baumgardner, 122 Pa. 17 ; Quinn’s Appeal, 162 Pa. 56 ; Howard’s Appeal, 162 Pa. 374 , and Bruce v. Pittsburg, 166 Pa. 152 .

Feitz Estate

402 Pa. 437 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 1961

In large measure, tbe broad language of Ryan was predicated upon Pichler v. Snavely, 366 Pa. 568 , 79 A. 2d 227 . … Szpakowski, 355 Pa. 357 , 49 A. 2d 682 ; Pichler v. Snavely, supra.

Coleman Estate

456 Pa. 163 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1974

Board of Directors, 324 Pa. 545, 550-51 , 188 A. 588, 591-92 (1936); Stevens’s Estate, 200 Pa. 318, 322-24 , 49 A. 985, 986-87 (1901) (per curiam); John C. Mercer Home v. … See Wilson v. Board of Directors, supra at 550-51, 188 A. at 591-92 ; Hamilton v. John O.

In Re: Canvass of Absentee and Mail-In Ballots

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 2020

Protz v. … See, e.g., Schwier v.

In Re: Canvass of Absentee and Mail-In Ballots

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 2020

Protz v. … See, e.g., Schwier v.

Protect PT, Aplt. v. Penn Twp ZHB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 2021

Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court entered July : 6, 2020 at No. 575 C.D. 2019, v … Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court entered July : 6, 2020 at No. 576 C.D. 2019, v

Lodge's Estate

287 Pa. 184 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 10, 1926

“Desertion begins with the intent to desert and to make such desertion permanent”: Hedderson v. Hedderson, supra. The foregoing quotation was taken by the court from Browne on Divorce, p. 144. … For an illustration of the application of this principle see Carroll v. Carroll, 68 N. J. Eq. 724, 61 Atl. 383 ; Foote v. Foote, 71 N. J. Eq. 273, 65 Atl. 205 .