Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

0.68s

  • Deal v. McCormick

    3 Serg. & Rawle 343 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1817

    In the case of Drinker v. … So in the case of Porter v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Liggett's Petition

    291 Pa. 109 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1927

    True, in Bryan v. … Co. v. Cuyler, 283 Pa. 422, 429 .” This principle controls in a case like the present: Ward’s App., 289 Pa. 458, 462 (bottom of page), and Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 47 S. C. 594, 595.

    Cited 54 timesPublished
  • Petition of Raudenbusch

    120 Pa. 328 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1888

    Justice Agnew in Schlaudecker v. Marshall, 72 Pa. 200 . … I will refer to Schlaudecker v. *343 Marshall, supra, which is upon all-fours with this, and where the question was raised upon an application for a mandamus to a board of licensers appointed under the act of May 10, 1871

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Azoulay, A. v. Phila. ZBA

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 30, 2019

    AZOULAY, IDIT AZOULAY AND : No. 586 EAL 2018 ASSAF LAVON : : : Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal v … : from the Order of the Commonwealth : Court : PHILADELPHIA ZONING BOARD OF : ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Acker

    308 Pa. 29 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 1932

    That was the purpose and condition of the board in this case. … S. 716, 731 ; Collins v. Kephart, 271 Pa. 428 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In re Anonymous No. 110 D.B. 89

    11 Pa. D. & C.4th 573 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1990

    Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lucarini, 504 Pa. 271 , 472 A.2d 186 (1983); Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kanuck, 517 Pa. 160 , 535 A.2d 69 (1987); Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. … The board recommends further that respondent be ordered to pay costs of investigating and prosecuting this matter. Messrs. Brown, Gilardi and Schiller dissent and would recommend a four-year suspension. Ms. Heh and Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ODC, Pet v. Jami Segota

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 2020

    OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2755 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No 153 DB 2020 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ODC v. Mario Sausville-Macias

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 2019

    OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2618 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 113 DB 2016 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. May

    551 Pa. 286 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 2, 1998

    See Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. Howard, 538 Pa. 86 , 645 A.2d 1300 (1994); Commonwealth v. Murphy, 540 Pa. 318 , 657 A.2d 927 (1995); Commonwealth v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Beamish

    81 Pa. 389 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 1876

    Within a prescribed space they exercise many of the faculties of a corporation : Wharton et al. v. School Directors, 6 Wright 358 . … L. 87, directs the board “ to place in the hands of the treasurer a certified duplicate of the school tax” for collection.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • ODC v. Joseph P. Maher

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 2019

    OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2417 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 4 DB 2018 : v … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ODC, Pet v. Hercules Pappas

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2020

    OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2675 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 190 DB 2018 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ODC, Pet v. Harris Roy Rosen

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 2020

    OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2361 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 5 DB 2017 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pottsville Referendum Case

    363 Pa. 460 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1949

    Fraud, on the other hand (Zeigler's Petition, 207 Pa. 131 , [ 56 A. 419 ]; York County v. Thompson, 212 Pa. 561 , [ 61 A. 1024 ]) or its equivalent, 'the wrongful or negligent act of a court official' (Singer v. … In Boord v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In re: Canvass of Provis. Ballots Appeal of Walsh

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 2024

    in upholding or dismissing any challenge may be reviewed by the court of common pleas of the county upon a petition filed by any petitioner aggrieved by the decision of the county board.” 25 P.S. § 3050(a.4)(4)(v). 4 “A … (v) Name.” 25 P.S. §§ 3150.12(b).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leslie v. Pennco, Inc.

    323 Pa. Super. 23 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1983

    Burrell v. Philadelphia Electric Co., 438 Pa. 286 , 265 A.2d 516 (1970); Brown v. McLean Trucking Co., 434 Pa. 427 , 256 A.2d 606 (1969); Jones v. Williams, 358 Pa. 559 , 58 A.2d 57 (1948). … Board of Assessment Appeals of Cambria County, 490 Pa. 486 , 417 A.2d 144 (1980); In re Breyer's Estate, 475 Pa. 108 , 379 A.2d 1305 (1977); Burns Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Boehm, 467 Pa. 307 , 356 A.2d 763 (1976).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • ODC v. Lee Eric Oesterling

    Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 24, 2022

    : No. 2898 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 82 DB 2022 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, AFT, Local 3 v. School District of Philadelphia

    636 Pa. 484 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 2016

    See SRC v. Phila. … Beecham v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Dewees v. Day

    291 Pa. 379 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 1927

    See Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co., 286 Pa. 199 ; Clark v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co., 264 Pa. 529 . … Rapid Transit Co., 283 Pa. 492, 495 ; McCoy v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Co., 275 Pa. 422 ; Sullivan v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R., 272 Pa. 429 ; Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co., 270 Pa. 476 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Frisbie

    506 Pa. 461 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1984

    Brown v. Ohio, [ 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1975)]. … Where consecutive sentences are imposed at a single trial, double jeopardy prevents the *466 court from exceeding its legislative authorization by imposing multiple punishments for the “same offense. ” Brown v.

    Cited 75 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.