Case law

In the Matter of: Donald B. Moreman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 2021

: No. 112 DB 2019 : Attorney Registration No. 47805 : : v. … Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

HK Porter Company Appeal

421 Pa. 438 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 24, 1966

Pursuant to these appeals the properties were reclassified by the board. On appeal the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County sustained the action of the board. This appeal followed. … Wilson v. Philadelphia School District, 328 Pa. 225 , 195 Atl. 90 (1937). The statutory authority for real estate assessment in Allegheny County is the General County Assessment Law, Act of May 22, 1933, P.

D'Amour, B. v. L Merion Twp, Pets.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2020

: Commonwealth Court : Respondents : : : v … OF LOWER MERION AND : BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE : TOWNSHIP OF LOWER MERION POLICE : PENSION FUND, : :

Fulton Farmers Ass'n v. Bomberger

262 Pa. 43 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1918

the rule was for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, the court below was without jurisdiction to enter judgment for part of the claim with leave to'proceed for the residue, and as to this he cites Faux v. … In Faux v.

Young Mens Christian Assoc. of Germantown v. Phila.

323 Pa. 401 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 2, 1936

A. of Phila. v. Monmouth Co. Board of Taxation (N. … Cunningham v. Board of Assessors, 52 La.

ODC v. Rhashea Lynn Harmon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 2020

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2695 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 72 DB 2019 : v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

In the Matter of: Michael v. Gilberti Jr.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 2020

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In the Matter of : No. 28 DB 2020 (No. 27 RST 2020) : : MICHAEL V .GILBERTI, JR. … The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.

In Re: Canvass of Absentee and Mail-In Ballots

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 2020

Protz v. … See, e.g., Schwier v.

Suburban Realty LP. v. Stroud Twp ZHB

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 2021

: Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v … : BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, : : Respondents : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 15th

Plains Township School District Appeal

438 Pa. 294 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1970

The challenged plan of school administrative units was developed by the Luzerne County Board of School Directors pursuant to the Act of July 8, 1968, P. L. *296 , 24 P.S. §§2400.1 et seq. … The State Board of Education approved the plan and the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County entered orders affirming the adjudications of the State Board.

ODC v. Michael John Csonka

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 2023

DISCIPLINARY : No. 3009 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 COUNSEL, : Petitioner : : No. 89 DB 2023 v … Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

UTTER v. Asten-Hill Mfg. Co.

453 Pa. 401 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 1973

Each award was affirmed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board and the Board’s decisions were upheld by the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia. The Commonwealth Court reversed ( 5 Pa. … The Board’s findings should prevail if there is competent evidence to sustain them. Follmer Truck *405 ing v. Stump, 4 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 110 , 286 A. 2d 1 (1972); State Workmen’s Insurance Fund v. Young, 2 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Grant

479 Pa. 74 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 1978

In Commonwealth v. … In Commonwealth v.

Wapples's Appeal

74 Pa. 100 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1873

In Wheatly v. Badger, 7 Barr 459, it was held, that where the will constitutes the executor a trustee, by name, and not virtute officii, the Orphans’ Court had no jurisdiction over the trust. … Where the testamentary trust is given to the executors virtute officii, jurisdiction is exclusively in the Orphans’ Court: Innes’ Estate, supra; Brown’s Appeal, supra; Seibert’s Appeal, supra.

Reading Blue Mtn N Railroad v. Seda COG Jt Rail A

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 11, 2021

: : : SEDA-COG JOINT RAIL AUTHORITY AND : BOARD OF SEDA-COG JOINT RAIL : AUTHORITY, SUSQUEHANNA UNION … : : : SEDA-COG JOINT RAIL AUTHORITY AND : BOARD OF SEDA-COG JOINT RAIL : AUTHORITY, SUSQUEHANNA UNION

Cooper v. Pittsburgh

390 Pa. 534 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1957

In Gleason v. … In Gustafson v.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cutruzzula

83 Pa. D. & C.4th 310 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2006

Instead, respondent by letter of October 27,2004, informed the secretary of the board that he accepted the recommendation of the board and would attend the private reprimand. … V. RECOMMENDATION The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recommends that the respondent, Francis S. Cutruzzula, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year.

ODC v. Jason R. Carpenter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 2022

: No. 2931 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : : No. 147 DB 2022 v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Powell, G. v. UCBR, Aplt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2017

POWELL : No. 38 MAP 2016 : : Appeal from the Order of the v. … B-13-09-D-B064 dated August 13, BOARD OF REVIEW : 2014.

Strohl v. Eastern Pennsylvania Railways Co.

270 Pa. 132 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1921

L. 642, we are required to consider whether there is evidence to support the findings of the' board and the court below; and, if there is, whether the law has been properly applied thereto: Kuca v. Lehigh Val. … R. v. Henderson, 51 Pa. 315 ; Hanover Junction, etc., R. R. Co. v. Anthony, 3 Walker 210 ; Camden & Atlantic R. R. Co. v. Bausch, 4 Sadler 518 ; Rowdin v. Penna. R. R. Co., 208 Pa. 623 ; Wilkes v.