Case law

Ingram v. Pittsburgh

346 Pa. 45 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1942

Superior Ct. 508 ; Commonwealth v. Bone, 64 Pa. Superior Ct. 44 . Moreover, the stenographer must testify as to the integrity of his or her notes and the transcript thereof: Commonwealth v. … That statute, as was said by this Court, in Freedman v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.

ODC v. John Joseph Grenko

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 2023

: No. 3018 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 COUNSEL, : : Petitioner : No. 141 DB 2023 v … Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

West Indies Mission Appeal

387 Pa. 534 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1957

In any number of cases, for example: The Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society’s Appeal, 30 Pa. 425 ; Frazier, Trustee v. St. Luke’s Church, 147 Pa. 256 , 23 A. 442 ; Presbyterian Board of Foreign Missions v. … In this Commonwealth, in the case of Sunday School Union v. City of Philadelphia, supra, and in Board of Home Missions v.

Thompson v. Carpenter

4 Pa. 132 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1846

v. … The distinction is taken in Fildes v. Hooker, 3 Mad. Rep. 193, in order to reconcile that case to Halsey v. Grant, 13 Ves. 75, and Horniblow v.

In re Anonymous No. 19 D.B. 76

8 Pa. D. & C.3d 400 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1976

[Anonymous], II, No. 74 Disciplinary Docket No. 1 (No. 43 D.B. 73) (public censure); Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. … [Anonymous], II, No. 94 Disciplinary Docket No. 1 (No. 39 D.B. 74) (public censure); Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.

Gilmore v. Gilmore Drug Co.

279 Pa. 193 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1924

Healy, 244 Pa. 427, 435 ; Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Seltzer, 227 Pa. 410 . … He dominates a majority of the board of directors and all the directors who constitute the executive committee of the board. He determines and controls the business and operations of the company.

Havens, W. v. WCAB (CNA Financial Corp)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 7, 2018

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v … Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court v

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Diangelus

589 Pa. 1 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 2006

In addition, while our review is de novo, the findings of the Hearing Committee and the Disciplinary Board are “guidelines for judging the credibility of witnesses,” Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. … Discipline The Hearing Committee and the Board correctly viewed the dishonesty of DiAngelus to ADA Stollsteimer as deceit to the court, and therefore cited Office of Disciplinary Counsel v.

Halko v. Foster Township School District

374 Pa. 269 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1953

Cartwright v. Cartwright, 350 Pa. 638, 644 , 40 A. 2d 30 . … Therefore when the plaintiff was absent for three consecutive years without statutory authority, his seniority rights began only when he was reemployed by the board, to wit, September 1,1945.

ODC v. Shelley L. Fant

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 2024

: No. 3038 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 78 DB 2023 : v … Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jurikson

66 Pa. D. & C.4th 217 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 2003

V. RECOMMENDATION The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania unanimously recommends that the respondent, Mark Jurikson, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. … Board Members Cunningham and Stewart recuse themselves in this matter. Board Member Sheerer did not participate in the May 14, 2003 adjudication.

Nether Providence Township School Authority v. Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc.

505 Pa. 42 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 31, 1984

Morgan; Brobst v. Reading, 236 Pa. 629 , 85 A. 65 (1912); Silsby Manufacturing Company v. Allentown, 153 Pa. 319 , 26 A. 646 (1893); Malone v. Philadelphia, 147 Pa. 416 , 23 A. 628 (1892); City v. … Hays, 93 Pa. 72 (1881); McKnight v. Pittsburgh, 91 Pa. 273 (1879); Hague v. Philadelphia, 48 Pa. 527, 529 (1865); Lehigh County v. Kleckner, 5 Watts & Serg. 181, 186 (1843).

Babcock School District v. Potocki

502 Pa. 349 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 19, 1983

Roberts v. … Babcock v. Potocki, 71 Pa. Cmwlth. 504, 508, 455 A.2d 273, 275 (1983) (footnotes omitted).

Epler v. North American Rockwell Corp.

482 Pa. 391 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 1978

Vardzel v. Dravo Corporation, 402 Pa. 19 , 165 A.2d 622 (1962); Ingersoll-Rand Company v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 12 Pa. Cm with. 502, 316 A.2d 673 (1974); Shaffer v. … Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, supra.

Beth. Area S.C. v. Bd. of Rev. Appeal of NH Cty

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 2020

PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT BETHLEHEM AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT : No. 66 MAL 2020 : : v … : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court THE BOARD OF REVENUE

ODC v. Pearlette Vivian Toussant

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 2023

: : No. 138 DB 2022 Petitioner : : Attorney Registration No. 85756 v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Commonwealth v. Tavares

382 Pa. Super. 317 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1989

Michael, who communicates through the use of a speak and spell word board, indicated, “No.” Tavares pushed David’s wheelchair against the door to hold it closed. … .); State v. Brown, 147 Vt. 324 , 515 A.2d 1059 (1986) (defendant criminally liable for forcing victims to have intercourse).

ODC v. Lynch, William H., Jr.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 2022

: Petitioner : No. 70 DB 2020 : : Attorney Registration No. 39874 v … Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).

Pookman v. SCH. DIST. OF UP. ST. CLAIR TP.

506 Pa. 74 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1984

Our task, therefore, is to simply determine whether the board committed an error of law and, if so, to correct that error. Pease v. Millcreek Township School District, 412 Pa. 378 , 195 A.2d 104 (1963). … A school board is authorized to furlough the necessary number of employees when there is a substantial decrease in pupil enrollment in the district. 24 P.S. § 11-1124(1). . Phillippi v.

Commonwealth v. Liederkrantz

450 Pa. 423 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1973

As required by Section 465 of the Liquor Code, Liederkrantz filed with the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board a bond in the amount of $2,000. … The same issue was considered in Commonwealth v. South Side World War Veteran’s Association, 88 Dauphin 57 (1967).